Skip to main content

Nuclear pore and nucleocytoplasmic transport impairment in oxidative stress-induced neurodegeneration: relevance to molecular mechanisms in Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s and other related neurodegenerative diseases

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are embedded in the nuclear envelope and facilitate the exchange of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. The dysfunction of the NPC and nuclear transport plays a significant role in aging and the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases. Common features among these neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD), encompass mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and the accumulation of insoluble protein aggregates in specific brain regions. The susceptibility of dopaminergic neurons to mitochondrial stress underscores the pivotal role of mitochondria in PD progression. Disruptions in mitochondrial-nuclear communication are exacerbated by aging and α-synuclein-induced oxidative stress in PD. The precise mechanisms underlying mitochondrial impairment-induced neurodegeneration in PD are still unclear. Evidence suggests that perturbations in dopaminergic neuronal nuclei are linked to PD-related neurodegeneration. These perturbations involve structural damage to the nuclear envelope and mislocalization of pivotal transcription factors, potentially driven by oxidative stress or α-synuclein pathology. The presence of protein aggregates, pathogenic mutations, and ongoing oxidative stress can exacerbate the dysfunction of NPCs, yet this mechanism remains understudied in the context of oxidative stress-induced PD. This review summarizes the link between mitochondrial dysfunction and dopaminergic neurodegeneration and outlines the current evidence for nuclear envelope and nuclear transport abnormalities in PD, particularly in oxidative stress. We highlight the potential role of nuclear pore and nucleocytoplasmic transport dysfunction in PD and stress the importance of systematically investigating NPC components in PD.

Introduction

A vital characteristic of eukaryotic cells is compartmentalization of genomic DNA and specific cellular functions within the nucleus, which is enclosed by two concentric lipid bilayer membranes known as the nuclear envelope (NE). Regulation of gene expression and the cell cycle in eukaryotic cells relies on the continuous exchange of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm. This transport is facilitated by the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) that are embedded throughout the NE [1]. NPCs are large macromolecular assemblies, of about 120 MDa in humans, that are embedded in the NE at sites where outer and inner nuclear membranes fuse to form channels [2]. These complexes are multifunctional; they serve as gatekeepers of the nucleus by forming a tightly regulated permeability barrier and are also key regulators of several crucial nuclear processes [3, 4].

The turnover of specific nucleoporins (Nups), the NPC building blocks, is very limited in quiescent cells, and certain components of the NPC, and its overall structure, can last throughout the lifespan of a cell [5]. This suggests that NPCs may accumulate damage and likely degrade over the course of normal and pathological aging [6, 7]. The loss of cellular compartmentalization is particularly detrimental to neurons, which are post-mitotic and highly polarized, and increasing evidence points to defective NPCs and nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT) machinery in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases. More precisely, NE abnormalities, loss of specific Nups from the NPC, and cytoplasmic aggregates of Nups along with nuclear transport receptors have been observed in neurodegeneration [8, 9]. Cellular oxidative stress associated with aging and neuronal degeneration has also been implicated in nuclear pore deterioration [10]. Tissues that have long lifespans and are highly susceptible to oxidative stress such as dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons, which are pivotal to Parkinson’s disease (PD) pathology, may be more prone to NPC damage. In this review, we explore in detail the current literature that provides evidence for NE abnormalities and mislocalization of proteins in PD pathogenesis. Studies on NPC dysfunction in both oxidative stress and other neurodegenerative diseases have already been extensively reviewed, so we only briefly summarize them here in relation to the pathogenic mechanisms involved in PD. Importantly, we highlight the open questions regarding the potential role of NPC and NCT dysfunction in PD and emphasize the need to systematically investigate NPC components in PD.

Nuclear pore complex structure and function

The NPC is made up of multiple copies of about 30 different Nups that assemble into stable subcomplexes [11]. These subcomplexes are comprehensively organized into a large protein complex characterized by eight spokes and eight-fold rotational symmetry along the axis perpendicular to the NE. The innermost components of the NPC form a core scaffold structure that is embedded in the NE and surrounds the central channel. This central channel connects the nucleoplasm to the cytoplasm and allows nucleocytoplasmic exchange of macromolecules [12]. The scaffold consists of three concentric rings: a membrane ring surrounded by two inner rings, and two outer rings that surround the inner rings and stabilize the curve in the NE. The two outer rings facing the nucleus and cytoplasm are called the nuclear and cytoplasmic rings, respectively [13]. The Nups within the core scaffold make up approximately half of the total NPC mass and are the most stably incorporated components of the NPC [14]. Asymmetric peripheral elements are attached to the core scaffold, and they line the central channel and protrude into the cytoplasm and nucleus. The Nups that fill the central channel contain multiple phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats and are referred to as FG-Nups, and they act as a selective barrier for nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT) across the pore. Peripheral Nups attached to the cytoplasmic side of the core form cytoplasmic filaments, while those on the nuclear side create a nuclear basket structure [12] (Fig. 1A). Overall, FG-Nups represent one-third of the NPC components, and the unfolded structure of their FG domains interacts with nuclear transport factors [15, 16]. These Nups can undergo phase separation to form liquid condensates due to the dynamic hydrophobic crosslinking between FG motifs [17, 18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustrations of the nuclear pore complex and classical nucleocytoplasmic transport. A Structure of the nuclear pore complex showing the main subcomplexes and their component nucleoporins (Nups). Created with BioRender.com. B In classical nuclear import, protein cargo containing the nuclear localization signal (NLS) is transported into the nucleus by importins. In classical nuclear export, protein cargo containing the nuclear export signal (NES) is exported from the nucleus by the exportin Crm1. The directionality of nucleocytoplasmic transport is mediated by Ran GTPase. After each nuclear export cycle, Ran-GDP is shuttled back to the nucleus by nuclear transport factor 2 (Ntf2). Adapted from “TRPS1 Transport into the Nucleus” , created by “Joshua Patrick” using BioRender.com (2024). Retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates.

Scaffold Nups

The inventory of scaffolding domains adopted by these Nups is relatively limited and consists of α-solenoid and β-propeller folds, and an ancestral coatomer elements (ACE) domain. These protein folds are used in a modular arrangement to form subcomplexes in the NPC scaffold rings [19]. A key component of the outer rings is the Y-complex, also known as the Nup107-Nup160 complex. In humans, 16 copies each of the Y-complex, in the form of rotationally staggered self-dimers, make the nuclear and cytoplasmic outer rings. The structure of the Y-complex has been well characterized over the years and its name derives from its characteristic ‘Y’ shape [12, 20]. This subcomplex is evolutionarily conserved, but its Nup composition can vary between species. Seven conserved members of the Y-complex are recognized: Nup96, Nup160, Nup107, Nup133, Nup85, Sect. 13 homolog 1 (Seh1) and Sect. 13. In vertebrates, Nup37, Nup43 and Elys also bind to the Y-complex, with Elys binding only to the nuclear face of the NPC [20]. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the Y-complex using high-resolution crystal structures of individual components uncovered the modularity and relative positions of individual Nups in this subcomplex [21]. The Y-complex has been shown to be crucial for post-mitotic assembly of the NPC [22, 23]. Depletion of this subcomplex in vitro leads to the formation of nuclei with a continuous NE that lacks NPCs. NPCs were assembled in these cells if the Y-complex was added back before NE formation [23]. The inner ring of the scaffold is the most structurally conserved component of the NPC. Inner ring Nups anchor the NPC scaffold to the NE membrane and serve as attachment points for the central channel FG-Nups [24]. Inner ring Nups comprise Nup205, Nup188, Nup93, Nup155, and Nup53 in vertebrates [13]. Nup53 and its interaction with Nup155 is essential for NE formation and NPC assembly [25]. Recent modeling of individual Nups and NPC subcomplexes has suggested that two copies of Nup93 form a bridge between the Y-complexes on nuclear and cytoplasmic rings [26]. To identify the most critical Nups for NPC assembly, Sakuma et al. [27] used a small interfering RNA (siRNA) screen against 28 Nups to show that depletion of components from the Y-complex and the inner ring Nup93-205 complex most strongly impairs NPC formation. The inner ring is attached to the pore membrane by interaction with the Nups in the membrane ring. Transmembrane Nups include Ndc1 (Nuclear-Division-Cycle 1), Pom121 (Pore membrane protein of 121 kDa), and Nup210. Ndc1 is highly conserved across species, while Pom121 is the least conserved transmembrane Nup and is unique to vertebrates [28]. These Nups have transmembrane helical domains and they tether and secure the NPC to the NE [29]. Ndc1 is involved in localization of the inner ring Nup53 to the NE and is therefore required for NPC assembly [30]. Ndc1 also interacts with and anchors another nuclear pore component, ALADIN, which is involved in nuclear import to the NE [31]. Pom121 interacts with the inner nuclear membrane proteins Lamin B receptor and Sun1 (of the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton or LINC complex) and plays a crucial role in NPC assembly [32, 33]. During interphase NPC assembly, Pom121 also associates with the inner ring Nup155 and outer ring Nup160, which may facilitate incorporation of the Y-complex as an early event in NPC assembly. While the N-terminal segment of Pom121 is predicted to interact with Nups155 and 160, the C-terminal region of this protein contains several FG repeats and it may protrude beyond the scaffold coat and into the NPC central channel [34]. Pom121 depletion severely reduced NPC numbers, which is shown by loss of the fluorescence signal from the NPC marker antibody MAb414, which binds to several FG-Nups [28].

Central channel Nups

Immunoelectron microscopy has placed three mammalian Nups at the NPC central channel: Nup62, Nup58, and Nup54 [35]. These Nups form the trimeric Nup62 subcomplex, which is connected to the NPC scaffold by direct coiled-coil interaction with the inner ring Nup93 [36]. One copy of the Nup62 complex is attached to each inner ring complex, thereby concentrating the corresponding FG domains at the equatorial plane of the NPC [37]. The Nup62-Nup58-Nup54 trimeric complex is essential for nuclear transport [38], and Nup62 is shown to directly interact with the nuclear transport receptor, importin β [39].

Overall, FG-Nups represent one-third of the NPC components, and the unfolded structure of the FG domain interacts with nuclear transport factors [15, 40]. The FG repeat clusters are predominantly present as Phe-Gly (FG), Gly-Leu-Phe-Gly (GLFG), or Phe-any-Phe-Gly (FxFG) [41]. FG-Nups in the central channel are anchored to the NPC via an alpha-helical structured domain, and the unstructured FG domain extends into the channel [42]. How the central channel FG-Nups form a selectively permeable barrier for NCT has been a subject of great interest in NPC research, and while several models have been proposed for it, the precise mechanism remains unclear. The most plausible and well-supported model is the selective phase model, which suggests that the FG repeats extend into the central channel and interact to form a mesh that facilitates the selective transport of cargo attached to the nuclear transport receptor [43]. Indeed, Frey et al. [44] have shown that yeast FG-Nups form inter-repeat interactions that cross-link the FG domains into elastic and reversible hydrogels. In another study, NPCs reconstituted from Xenopus laevis egg extracts were used to show that cohesion between FG repeats forms a sieve-like hydrogel, which is required to maintain the NPC permeability barrier. Specifically, this study highlighted the role of the highly cohesive GLFG repeat containing Nup98 in maintaining the barrier [45]. Nup98 is highly mobile, and it serves as a flexible linker of outer and inner ring structures in the NPC scaffold, while its hydrophobic FG motifs contribute to the permeability barrier [46, 47]. Nup98 also directly interacts with the exportin Crm1 (Chromosomal Maintenance 1) in a Ran GTPase-dependent manner and serves as a shuttling cofactor in nuclear export [48]. It has recently been shown that more than half of the FG-Nups can undergo phase separation to form liquid condensates due to the dynamic hydrophobic crosslinking between FG motifs. Importantly, central channel FG-Nups primarily contain GLFG repeats, which typically form a remarkably dynamic network through numerous short-lived FG-FG interactions. Peripheral FG-Nups are mainly of the FxFG type and are predicted to form an ectopic barrier at the entry and exit of the nuclear pore [17].

Nuclear basket Nups

The peripheral structure of the NPC in the nuclear compartment is termed the nuclear basket. This structure consists of eight filaments that are attached to the nuclear outer ring and form a distal ring in the nucleoplasm [37]. The nuclear basket comprises Tpr [49], Nup50 [50], and Nup153 [51]. Nuclear basket Nups contain FG-repeats, α/β motifs, α-helical domains, and intrinsically disordered regions [52]. Tpr is the central architectural component that forms the core structure of the nuclear basket [53]. Tpr has an intrinsically disordered C terminal with the lowest number of FG repeats among FG-Nups, and N terminal coiled-coils [54]. It has been reported that Tpr interacts with Crm1, and that depletion of Tpr compromises nuclear export signal (NES)-mediated export of proteins [55, 56]. Tpr also serves as a regulator of mRNA export via the mRNA export factor Nxf1 and it also facilitates tRNA export [54]. Another key function of Tpr is negative regulation of the NPC assembly through recruitment of the Y-complex to the NE. NPC numbers and density in the NE are determined by protein levels and phosphorylation status of Tpr [57].

Nup50 directly facilitates nuclear import by functioning as a co-factor with the nuclear import proteins importin α and importin β [58]. Nup50 associates with the nuclear basket via interaction of its N terminal region with Nup153, both directly and through importin α. The Nup153-Nup50 interface provides a platform for efficient NCT [59]. Structurally, Nup153 contains three domains: a unique N terminal domain that is pore-targeting, a central zinc finger region and a C terminal domain with several FxFG repeats [60]. The N terminal domain of Nup153 interacts with Tpr as well as the Y-complex in the nuclear coaxial ring, which may help in anchoring Tpr, and hence the nuclear basket, to the NPC core [53]. The C terminal FG domain is highly flexible and interacts with nuclear transport receptors, indicating its role in NCT [54]. Nup153 also binds to the nuclear lamina and Sun1 protein [61] of the LINC complex. Depletion of either Nup153 or lamin leads to NPC clustering, suggesting that this interaction may regulate the distribution of NPCs across the NE [62, 63].

Cytoplasmic filament Nups

Peripheral Nups on the cytoplasmic face of the NPC form elongated structures called cytoplasmic filaments. Cytoplasmic filament Nups contain FG repeats, and like the nuclear basket Nups, they contribute to NCT by providing a docking site for macromolecular cargo and nuclear transport factors. Additionally, these Nups play a role in export and remodeling of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) in preparation for translation [64]. Cytoplasmic filaments comprise three FG-Nups: Nup358, Nup214, and Nup42 [54]. Nup358 is only present in vertebrate NPCs and is the largest known Nup. The Nup358 complex, also known as the Ran-binding protein 2 (RanBP2) complex, is a prominent component of cytoplasmic filaments [65]. Structurally, Nup358 contains several distinct domains including FG repeats, binding sites for the small GTPase Ran, an E3 ligase domain, an S-shaped α-helical solenoid followed by a coiled-coil oligomerization element at the N terminal, and a C-terminal prolyl-isomerase domain. Near-atomic composite maps of the cytoplasmic filaments from advanced structural characterization show that pentameric complexes of Nup358 are linked by the oligomerization element and affixed to the central stalk region of the NPC through their N-terminal domains. This arrangement allows flexible attachment of domains that project far into the cytoplasm [64]. Nup358 is shown to be dispensable for architectural integrity of the NPC and export of RNA, but it is needed for efficient translation [64, 66]. A non-FG Nup, Nup88, also localizes to the cytoplasmic face of the NPC and interacts with Nup214. The coiled-coil regions of Nup214 and Nup88 also interact with the central channel FG-Nup Nup62 to form a heterotrimeric hub [12, 26]. The Nup214-Nup88 subcomplex facilitates nuclear export by directly binding to the nuclear export receptor Crm1 [67]. The FG domain in the extreme C terminal of Nup214 also interacts with the mRNA export protein Nxf1 [68]. Nup42 interacts with the shuttling mRNA export mediator Gle1 via a non-FG region [69]. The DEAD-box ATPase (Dbp5/DDX19) interacts with Nup214 [70] and also forms a complex together with Nup42 and Gle1 [71] to orchestrate mRNP remodeling in the final stages of mRNA export on the cytoplasmic side of the NPC. Gle1 also interacts with the C terminal of the inner ring Nup155 via its N terminal, and this association may help position Gle1 along the NPC in the mRNA export pathway [26]. Another shuttling mRNA factor, Rae1, contributes to mRNA export by forming an mRNP-binding complex with the mobile linker Nup98 at the cytoplasmic face of NPC [72].

Conservation and dynamics of the NPC architecture

Being crucial gatekeepers of nuclei, NPCs are present in all eukaryotic cells and the overall eight-fold symmetry of these complexes is largely conserved across all species. While the NPC is functionally preserved across species, from yeast to humans, variations in the structural assembly of NPCs can be observed. Firstly, the mass of yeast and human NPCs substantially differ and the stoichiometry of certain Nups in yeast is lower when compared to the human pore complex. Integrative structural modeling of the NPC has revealed that the inner ring is smaller in S. cerevisiae compared to humans but the overall arrangement of Nups is similar in both. Secondly, the connection between inner and outer rings, which is formed by Nup155 in vertebrates, is missing in the yeast NPC [73, 74]. A remarkable difference emerged in the nuclear and cytoplasmic outer rings. Although the Y-complex is conserved, eight copies of this complex make up each ring in yeast, with a total of 16 copies of the Y-complex in each NPC. In humans, however, both nuclear and cytoplasmic rings are made of two concentrically arranged eight-membered rings of the Y-complex, with a total of 32 copies of the Y-complex in each NPC [75]. Interestingly, the algal NPC lacks two-fold symmetry along the NE axis because it has a single Y-complex ring on the cytoplasmic face but two concentrically arranged Y-complex rings on the nuclear side, with 24 Y-complex copies in total. Cryo-electron tomography reconstruction of the human NPC, derived from HeLa cells depleted of Nup358, revealed human NPCs with a singular outer cytoplasmic ring. Therefore, the differences in the stoichiometry of the cytoplasmic outer rings between these species may be explained by the absence of direct homologs of Nup358 in both S. cerevisiae and the unicellular algal species C. reinhardtii. Another difference in the algal NPC is the dilated inner ring, yielding a wider central channel [12].

NPCs have been considered as relatively static structures, unlike the dynamic shuttling of macromolecular cargo and transport receptors across the pores during NCT. However, studies on NPC dynamics show that, despite the stable embedding of NPCs in the NE, their subcomplexes and individual components may undergo dynamic modifications. These include conformational adjustments of the NPC during NCT and broader structural transitions throughout the cell cycle [76]. A cryo-electron tomography study [77] of NPC rearrangement during NCT revealed that cytoplasmic filaments curve toward the central channel, suggesting a possible direct interaction with cargo during the transport process. In another study [78] on spatiotemporal dynamics of the NPC, the highly flexible FG-Nups that surround the cytoplasmic opening of the NPC underwent rapid elongation and retraction. The study further revealed that the central channel FG-Nups display interweaving transient entanglements but do not form a rigid, tightly crosslinked meshwork. Consequently, the functional structure of the NPC barrier consists of highly dynamic FG-Nups, which appear as a central plug when averaged over space and time.

Individual Nups may be very dynamic and exhibit transient associations with the NPC. Hakhverdyan et al. [14] comprehensively investigated the dynamics of individual NPC components and found that turnover of Nups is uniformly slow but they are exchanged in the NPC at significantly different rates. The variation in Nup exchange correlated with their structural role rather than peripheral position in the NPC. The outer, inner, and membrane rings of the NPC scaffold are the most stably incorporated subcomplexes, apart from membrane ring component Ndc1. Similarly, core components of cytoplasmic filaments are also stable and have low exchange rates. The most dynamic NPC components are the flexible linker Nups and Nups involved in RNA export and RNA remodeling factors such as the nuclear basket and Gle1. This is in agreement with previous studies that have shown that scaffold Nups such as the Y-complex show stable association with the NPC while nuclear basket proteins like Nup153 and Nup50 exhibit highly dynamic behavior [79]. It has been shown that Nup107 and Nup93 are not exchanged once incorporated into the NPC [80]. Among dynamic Nups, Nup50 exhibits the shortest association time with the NPC [81]. It has been suggested that modular construction of the NPC and exchange of Nups ensures the maintenance of NPCs and imparts resilience to damage [14].

Nucleocytoplasmic transport

The NPC forms a soft barrier to passive diffusion. While small molecules can pass freely through the pore, the FG domains near the cytoplasmic side of the central channel, characterized by high net charge and low hydrophobicity, hinder the diffusion of larger macromolecules [82]. Therefore, larger macromolecular cargoes must rely on soluble nuclear transport receptors for transport through the central channel of the NPC [15, 83]. These nuclear transport factors specifically identify and bind to cargo destined for translocation, efficiently shuttling them back and forth through the nuclear pores. The transport signals required for import into and export from the nucleus are respectively termed the nuclear localization signal (NLS) and nuclear export signal (NES) [40]. Nuclear transport receptors are divided into importins for nuclear entry and exportins for exit from the nucleus [84]. The directionality of NCT is determined by a concentration gradient of Ran GTPase across the nucleus. Nuclear Ran primarily exists in a GTP-bound state, while cytoplasmic Ran is GDP-bound [85]. This steep Ran GTPase gradient is maintained by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RCC1) in the nucleus and a GTPase-activating protein (RanGAP) in the cytoplasm. RCC1 is bound to chromatin within the nucleus, and it promotes the release of GDP from Ran by stabilizing nucleotide-free Ran in the nucleoplasm. In the cytoplasm, RanGAP and Ran-binding protein RanBP1 stimulate the hydrolysis of GTP to maintain cytosolic Ran in the GDP-bound state [86]. In classical nuclear import, NLS-containing protein cargo is recognized by importins, importin α and importin β, which guide the cargo to the NPC and physically associate with FG-Nups to translocate the import complex through the NPC central channel. In the nucleus, Ran-GTP interacts with the import complex and reduces the interaction between importins and cargo, causing complex disassembly and cargo release into the nucleus. Subsequently, Ran-GTP forms a complex with importin β, which is shuttled back to the cytoplasm for recycling [87]. In nuclear export, Ran-GTP cooperatively associates with the exportin Crm1 in the nucleus, which initiates the binding of NES-containing cargo with Crm1. The cargo-Crm1-Ran-GTP trimeric complex interacts with Nups and translocates through the NPC to the cytoplasm. Once on the cytoplasmic side, RanGAP induces the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP in Ran, leading to the simultaneous dissociation of Ran from Crm1 and the release of cargo into the cytoplasm. The cytoplasmic Ran-GDP associates with nuclear transport factor 2 for transport back into the nucleus through the NPC. Upon reaching the nucleoplasm, Ran-GDP is recharged with GTP, thereby replenishing nuclear Ran-GTP for another cycle of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking [88] (Fig. 1B). The export of bulk mRNA, however, is atypical and follows a distinct mechanism that requires a different set of export receptors and does not rely on the Ran-GTPase gradient [89]. The transcription-export (TREX) complex is assembled on completely processed mRNA, and comprises the multiprotein THO complex and several mRNA export factors including Nxf1-Nxt1 [90].

Transport-independent role of Nups

In addition to their primary role as facilitators of the nucleocytoplasmic exchange of molecules, NPCs play a key role in regulating various cellular processes independent of transport. Increasing evidence shows the involvement of NPCs in genome organization and the regulation of gene expression through functional connectivity. Chromatin has been found to bind both stable and dynamic Nups, and Nup target genes are observed both at the nuclear periphery in proximity to NPCs and within the nucleoplasm where they are bound by soluble Nups [91, 92]. The initial evidence of NPCs playing a role in the activation of gene expression came from a study [93] in S. cerevisiae that showed involvement of the Nup84 (mammalian Nup107) subcomplex in transcriptional stimulation. In yeast, the movement of several genes from the nuclear interior to NPCs has been demonstrated upon activation, and it is evident that NPC-tethering plays a crucial role in maintaining proper gene expression and transcriptional memory [94]. Studies [91, 92] in Drosophila have interestingly shown that Nup50, Nup62, Nup88, Sect. 13, and Nup98 regulate the expression of developmental and cell cycle genes by directly interacting with gene loci in the nucleoplasm away from the NPC. They further noted that Nup88 interacts with silent loci but nucleoplasmic Sect. 13, Nup50, Nup62, and Nup98 primarily localized to transcriptionally active genes. NPC-tethered Nup98, however, was shown to induce gene silencing. In different human cell cultures, Nup153 and Nup93 bind to super-enhancers of a subset of cell-type-specific genes at the nuclear periphery [95]. Like Nup98, Nup153 also interacts with the genome away from the NPC in both Drosophila and mouse cells [96, 97]. Being FG-Nups, these Nups may undergo phase separation in the nucleoplasm to form foci. Such intranuclear Nup98 foci have been observed in some cell types and are shown to recruit additional Nups, such as components of the Y-complex [98].

Nups function as epigenetic regulators of gene expression in a cell type- and context-dependent manner by interacting with different protein partners such as transcription factors and chromatin-modifying proteins. Notably, several Nups are involved in regulating the expression of differentiation genes and are crucial in establishing the balance between cell stemness and differentiation [99].Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that Nups are involved in various functions within the central nervous system and significantly influence neurogenesis and neurophysiology by serving as key mediators of neuroepigenetics [100]. The NPC also confers stability to the genome by serving important functions in the DNA damage response pathways [101]. Specifically, Nup153 and Nup50 act in concert to import the key double-strand break repair factor 53BP1 into the nucleus and target it to damaged foci [102, 103].

Parkinson’s disease

The neuropathology of PD is characterized by a progressive loss of DAergic neurons within the substantia nigra (SN), leading to a deficit of striatal DA levels [104]. Another pathological hallmark of PD is the deposition of abnormal aggregates of α-synuclein protein within the cell bodies of neurons [105]. These intracytoplasmic aggregates are called Lewy bodies, and in addition to α-synuclein, they contain several other proteins like ubiquitin, heat shock proteins, tau, and proteasomal and lysosomal elements [106]. The cardinal motor symptoms associated with PD are tremors, rigidity, slowness of movement, and postural instability [105]. Several non-motor symptoms such as olfactory deficits, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, autonomic changes and depression are also associated with PD, and these symptoms usually appear in the prodromal stage of the disease [107]. The etiology of PD is complex and multifactorial with gene-environment interactions playing key roles in disease development. Genetic mutations underlie a minority of PD cases. Approximately 20 different genes have been identified in familial PD studies, and genome-wide association studies have identified over 200 genes as potential risk factors in sporadic PD [108]. Environmental factors are believed to play an important role in the causation of most sporadic PD cases where consequential mutations in PD-linked genes are absent. Data from epidemiological studies regarding environmentally linked PD has been inconsistent, making causal inference difficult [109]. Nonetheless, occupations with a higher PD risk have been investigated, and these include working with pesticides [110, 111] and heavy metals [112]. A primary risk factor for idiopathic PD is aging, with the incidence of PD increasing in individuals over 65 years of age [113, 114] (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The risk factors and molecular pathways associated with PD. A A schematic overview of the etiology of PD. B The interplay between mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, α-synuclein toxicity, and aberrant mitochondria-nuclear signaling contributes to DAergic neuron loss in PD. Created with BioRender.com

Mitochondrial dysfunction and the selective vulnerability of DAergic neurons

Several lines of evidence have implicated mitochondrial dysfunction in DAergic neurodegeneration in PD. Mitochondrial impairment was directly linked to PD by the observation that complex I subunits and activity are significantly reduced in the SN and striata of PD patient brains compared to healthy controls [115, 116]. Keeney et al. [117] reported increased oxidation and the misassembly of mitochondrial complex I subunits as well as reduced rates of electron transfer through complex I in PD brains. A recent proteomic analysis of the human PD brain by Toomey et al. [118] demonstrated that mitochondrial dysfunction is present across multiple brain regions associated with Braak staging. Mitochondrial impairment occurred prior to or simultaneously with α-synuclein aggregation, before neuronal loss emerged, and is thus implicated as an early driver of sporadic PD. The common pathways that were altered in the PD brains include oxidative phosphorylation and ATP synthesis, mitochondrial metabolism, and glutathione metabolism and redox regulation. Chen et al. [119] studied multiple protein targets in post-mortem brains of PD patients and control cases using imaging mass cytometry. Their analysis revealed a significant reduction in mitochondrial quality control machinery in the SN of PD brains, suggesting disrupted mitochondrial turnover and proteostasis. DAergic neurons have elevated energetic requirements because of their exceptionally long axonal arbor and autonomous pacemaking [120,121,122]. Moreover, DAergic neurons produce and are exposed to oxidative stress because of DA metabolism, particularly its degradation and oxidation, which generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive DA quinones, respectively [122, 123]. These data show that DAergic neurons are particularly susceptible to mitochondrial dysfunction; however, the precise mechanisms underlying this selective vulnerability are poorly understood.

Mitochondria are a common target of many genetic mutations and environmental toxicants associated with PD [124]. Mutations in several PD-linked genes, including SNCA, LRRK2, and DJ1 have been shown to induce mitochondrial stress and increased ROS production [125,126,127]. LRRK2 is a multifunctional protein that affects mitochondrial function, and mutations in its gene are a prevalent cause of late-onset autosomal dominant PD [128]. Most common PD-associated mutations in LRRK2 disrupt calcium homeostasis, impair mitophagy and mitochondrial fission and fusion, and lead to increased oxidative stress [129]. PINK1 and PRKN are the most common autosomal recessive genes associated with early-onset PD. The products of these genes function in concert with the mitophagy pathway and their PD-associated mutations therefore impair mitochondrial quality control [130, 131]. The initial evidence that connected mitochondrial impairment to PD came from unintentional exposure of illicit drug users to the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine). Exposed individuals developed irreversible and progressive Parkinsonism and DAergic neurodegeneration [132, 133]. Epidemiological studies have identified a positive association between PD risk and exposure to pesticides like rotenone or paraquat that are known for either inhibiting mitochondrial complex I or inducing oxidative stress [134,135,136]. Neurotoxins like MPTP, rotenone, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), and other mitochondria-impairing toxins are shown to induce DAergic neuron loss in animal models, allowing them to exhibit the clinical features of PD. This approach is widely used to create experimental animal and cell models that mimic sporadic PD to investigate the underlying mechanisms [137, 138]. Heavy metals such as iron and manganese also contribute to PD progression by inducing free radical production, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [139].

Crosstalk between mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and α-synuclein toxicity

In aging individuals, as critical processes essential for DAergic neuron function begin to decay, the accumulation of ROS and oxidative stress from DA metabolism also accelerates. The combined effect of these age-related defects renders these neurons susceptible to additional stressors such as mitochondrial complex I impairment and toxic α-synuclein species [140]. Interestingly, evidence is emerging for considerable crosstalk between mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and α-synuclein toxicity pathways in PD. Both mutant and wild-type α-synuclein have been found to localize to mitochondrial compartments, where they interact with mitochondrial proteins like Parkin, PINK1 and ATP synthase and regulate mitochondrial dynamics and bioenergetics [141, 142]. While monomeric α-synuclein enhanced ATP production [141], α-synuclein oligomers and overexpression of both wild-type and mutant α-synuclein decreased complex I activity, increased ROS production and contributed to mitochondrial dysfunction [143,144,145]. In a recent study, Choi et al. [146] tracked the intracellular conformational states of A53T mutant α-synuclein and revealed that its seeding events predominantly take place on membrane surfaces, particularly on mitochondrial membranes, and the mitochondrial lipid cardiolipin triggers A53T α-synuclein oligomerization. Another study [147] has shown that pathological α-synuclein aggregates, but not overexpressed α-synuclein alone, exhibit transient and dynamic interactions with mitochondria, resulting in mitochondrial depolarization, reduced ATP production, and mitochondrial fragmentation and degradation. The aggregation of α-synuclein also correlates with diminished mitochondrial content in human DAergic neurons and the midbrain of mouse models. Similarly, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress can affect α-synuclein accumulation and pathology by oxidative modifications and misfolding of α-synuclein, making it partly resistant to proteasomal degradation [148, 149]. Therefore, an intimate connection exists between mitochondrial dysfunction and α-synuclein toxicity in the progression of DAergic neuronal loss. More importantly, the evidence for the vulnerability of DAergic neurons to mitochondrial toxins, mitochondrial alterations found in post-mortem PD tissue, and the association of mutations in mitochondrial proteins to PD risk shows a crucial pathogenic role for mitochondria in PD progression. Furthermore, evidence of oxidative DNA damage in PD brains was put forth by Dias et al. [150, 151]. Conversely, mitochondrial biogenesis is dependent on organized transcriptional activity of both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes [119]. Aberrant mitochondrial-nuclear communication and impaired nuclear transcriptional regulation of mitochondrial proteins also contribute to the decline in mitochondrial turnover that occurs in aged and PD neurons. This may worsen the effect of aging-related and α-synuclein-induced oxidative stress (Fig. 2B). We must enhance our understanding of the precise mechanisms by which mitochondrial impairment contributes to the genetic and sporadic manifestations of PD if effective mitochondria-based therapies are to be developed [121].

Evidence of altered nucleocytoplasmic transport in PD

Multiple studies have shown the mislocalization of specific proteins such as transcription factors in PD, implicating NCT defects in disease pathogenesis. In primary DAergic neurons exposed to the oxidative neurotoxin 6-OHDA, total and phosphorylated cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) accumulate in the cytosol, accompanied by their decreased nuclear staining. Moreover, cytoplasmic phospho-CREB increases in degenerating nigral neurons of PD and Lewy body disease patients compared to healthy controls [152]. In neurons, CREB activity has been associated with diverse physiological processes such as cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, plasticity, and synaptic activity [153]. Therefore, mislocalization of CREB may lead to an altered transcriptional cascade, which is likely to have significant impacts on neuronal viability and function. Similarly, granulated immunoreactivity of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) has been observed in the cytoplasm of nigral neurons with Lewy body pathology in PD brain tissues [154, 155]. Phospho-ERK alteration appeared at an earlier disease stage. Exposure of an in vitro neural cell culture model to 6-OHDA also induced cytoplasmic localization of phospho-ERK, which was blocked by treatment with the antioxidant catalase, indicating the role of oxidative stress in phospho-ERK alteration. Aberrant cytoplasmic localization of catalytically active ERK alters the downstream targets, which may have important implications for disease pathogenesis [154]. A fraction of the cytoplasmic activated ERK also localizes to the mitochondria and induces mitophagy and autophagic stress during neurodegeneration [156] (Fig. 3). In a forward genetics screen to identify regulators of gene expression in presynapses, the THO nuclear export complex was found as a crucial regulator of synaptic mRNA export in DAergic neurons. THO complex mutations in C. elegans induce entrapment of synaptic transcripts in the nucleus, leading to decreased protein expression and impaired DAergic presynapses. Conditional deletion of THO complex subunit 5 in mouse DAergic neurons leads to severely compromised synapse maintenance, DAergic neurodegeneration, and locomotor defects [157]. These findings suggest that dysfunction of the THO complex and nuclear mRNA export has crucial implications for DAergic neuronal function.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Summary of mislocalization of specific proteins in DAergic neurons in PD. (1) Oxidative stressors increase the translocation of α-synuclein to the nucleus where it can markedly alter gene expression. This could account for the accumulation of phosphorylated α-synuclein in the nuclei of patient brains. (2) Phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and (3) total and phosphorylated cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) accumulate in the cytoplasm of dopaminergic neurons exposed to 6-hydroxydopamine and in PD patient neurons. A fraction of the cytoplasmic phospho-ERK also localizes to the mitochondria. Created with BioRender.com

Recent progress in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerative disorders has linked the mislocalization and abnormal accumulation of disease-causing proteins to impaired NCT [158]. Oxidative stressors increase the nuclear translocation of α-synuclein in DAergic neurons in vitro and in vivo [159, 160]. Moreover, while nuclear α-synuclein has been found in both control and dementia with Lewy body disease brain tissues, phosphorylated α-synuclein shows a 14-fold increase in the nuclei of patient brains [161]. Nuclear localized α-synuclein promotes neurotoxicity by altering transcription, histone modification and inducing DNA damage [159, 162]. Nuclear α-synuclein also exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction by transcriptional modulation of the mitochondrial regulator, PGC1-α [163] (Fig. 3). Synucleinopathies have been associated with abnormalities in nuclear transport receptors [164]. In a recent study, mice were engineered to express endogenous α-synuclein fused with an NLS. These mice show age-dependent motor deficits, motor cortex atrophy, and dysregulation of proteins involved in dopaminergic signaling. Notably, these phenotypes appeared in the absence of α-synuclein phosphorylation or aggregation, indicating that the chronic buildup of nuclear α-synuclein can induce toxic phenotypes in mice [165]. Phosphorylation [166], cleavage [160], and interaction with other nuclear proteins [167, 168] are suspected in the nuclear mislocalization of α-synuclein, but the exact factors and cellular mechanisms that induce nuclear accumulation of α-synuclein in PD are unclear. A specific NLS is lacking in α-synuclein, so it is unclear whether its nuclear uptake involves active or passive mechanisms, or how α-synuclein is retained in the nucleus. It was suggested that nuclear import of α-synuclein may be mediated by importin α [169], but more recently Chen et al. [167] have demonstrated that the downregulation of Ran has no impact on the nuclear localization of α-synuclein. Thus, the nuclear import of α-synuclein may be passive. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of nuclear import and export of α-synuclein and its interaction with the nuclear pore components.

PD-linked mutations disrupt the nuclear envelope architecture

Another potential pathological mechanism underpinning DAergic neurodegeneration in PD that is worthy of further investigation is the impairment of NPC components and the NCT apparatus. To date, only a handful of studies have investigated nuclear membrane alterations in PD, however, PD-linked mutations are known to disrupt the NE architecture. Studies on the mechanistic role of nuclear α-synuclein show that A53T and triplication mutations of the SNCA locus exacerbate nuclear aging and disrupt NE integrity in stem cell-derived DAergic neurons [167, 170]. Furthermore, α-synuclein is involved in NCT by interaction with Ran GTPase, and A53T mutant α-synuclein aberrantly sequesters Ran preventing it from orchestrating the transport of macromolecules across the nucleus [167]. Thus, it remains to be investigated whether NCT impairment leads to α-synuclein accumulation in the nucleus, or if passively diffused nuclear α-synuclein induces impairment of NCT by interacting with Ran.

PD patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with the dominant G2019S mutation in LRRK2 are reported to show a progressive deterioration in NE morphology, including loss of Lamin B1. The neural stem cells derived from these iPSCs show impaired clonal expansion and compromised differentiation into functional neurons. Moreover, these NE and differentiation defects can be reversed by targeted correction of the G2019S mutation in PD patient iPSCs [171]. NE impairment was also seen in post-mortem human brain samples from both LRRK2 (G2019S) and idiopathic PD patients [171, 172]. LRRK2 has been shown to translocate to the nucleus, where it directly interacts with Lamin A/C. Both LRRK2 knockdown and G2019S mutant transgenic mice have disorganized nuclear lamina, abnormal NE and leakage of the nuclear protein 53BP1 to the cytoplasm [172]. Another common PD-associated LRRK2 mutation, R1441C, age-dependently increased NE invaginations and reduced nuclear circularity in conditional transgenic mice. Interestingly, these mice do not show DAergic neurodegeneration, striatal DA deficits, α-synuclein pathology, or motor deficits, implying that aberrant nuclear architecture might constitute an early characteristic of LRRK2-induced neuronal loss in PD [173] (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of nuclear envelop (NE) and nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT) impairment observed in disease models of Parkinson’s disease (PD)-related genes

The PD-linked E3 ubiquitin ligase, Parkin, has been shown to directly interact with a cytoplasmic filament component of the NPC, Nup358/Ran-binding protein 2. Ubiquitination of Nup358 by Parkin leads to its degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in human neuroblastoma cells, implying that Parkin mutations may compromise Nup358 degradation, causing its accumulation and impairing NCT [174]. To study the role of Nup358 in the stress response, Cho et al. [175] exposed Nup358 haplo-insufficient mice acutely to the Parkinsonian neurotoxin and mitochondrial complex I inhibitor MPTP and observed an exacerbated disease phenotype. Upon MPTP stress, Nup358 haplo-insufficient mice exhibited reduced motor activity, metabolic imbalances, and slower recovery compared to wild-type mice, but notably, they did not have DAergic neuron loss. This study examines gene-environment interactions underlying early Parkinsonism, and more importantly, uncovers the possibility that Nup dysfunction may enhance susceptibility to neurotoxic stress.

Nuclear pore and nucleocytoplasmic transport impairment under oxidative stress

Increasing evidence from studies on both human brain tissue and animal models suggests that oxidative stress-induced disruptions in the structure and function of NPC are common characteristics of degenerating neurons. Oxidatively damaged proteins accumulate during aging and contribute to cellular dysfunction, particularly in postmitotic cells [176, 177]. D’Angelo et al. [79] have discovered that Nup93 and Nup153 are carbonylated by oxidation of amino acid side chains in aged rat nuclei, which is indicative of oxidative damage. To test the effect of oxidative stress on nuclear leakiness, they treated post-mitotic worms with paraquat and found that paraquat-induced oxidative stress resulted in an increased number and earlier onset of leaky nuclei, which was exacerbated in older worms. In non-neuronal models of oxidative stress, several mechanisms associated with nuclear transport are disrupted, including compromised nuclear membrane integrity, mislocalization of Nups, and altered Ran-GDP/GTP gradient. Oxidative stress has been shown to modulate the expression, stability, and structure of nuclear lamins [178], impacting nuclear membrane integrity and potentially impairing NCT. Being a redox-active protein, Ran may be a prime target of cellular oxidative stress [179]. Ran nucleotide exchange may also be reduced under oxidative stress conditions, thereby disrupting its nucleocytoplasmic gradient [180]. In HeLa cells, hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress leads to the depletion of nuclear Ran and inhibits the docking of import cargo at the NE, blocking classical nuclear import. Nup153 and the nuclear transport receptor importin β also redistribute throughout the nucleus in these cells [181, 182]. Similarly, diethyl maleate-induced oxidative stress reduces the efficiency of classical nuclear import and leads to the mislocalization of multiple Nups in HeLa cells. Specifically, Nup153 and Nup88 are redistributed in the nucleoplasm, Nup88 is mislocalized to the cytoplasm, and Nup50 is more nuclear-retained upon oxidative stress. Additionally, nuclear accumulation of the nuclear transport proteins importin-α and CAS were also identified [183]. In another study, Crampton et al. [184] showed that Ran and Crm1 become increasingly linked, which inhibits nuclear export in HeLa cells exposed to diethyl maleate. The authors also noted that Nup358 gets reduced at the NE and nuclear redistribution of Nup98 occurs. In the above-mentioned studies the nuclear membrane barrier remained intact, so it can be inferred that the oxidative stress-induced changes in nuclear transport are driven by alterations in the transport machinery and not simply a result of NE permeabilization [185]. Mahboubi et al. [186] demonstrated that diethyl maleate also induces the formation of cytoplasmic stress granules that sequester importin-α1, α4, α5, and importin-β1 nuclear transport receptors. Members of the importin α family are involved in transcriptional regulation, and it was found that under normal conditions, importin α1 indirectly associates with poly(A)-RNA, but this interaction decreases in diethyl maleate-induced oxidative stress.

Cellular oxidative stress also induces notable alterations in the phosphorylation and O-linked-N-acetylglucosaminylation (O-GlcNAcylation) patterns of Nups and NCT machinery. Post-translational modifications play a central role in regulating NPC structure and function [187, 188]. Aberrant activation of mitotic kinases that regulate NPC disassembly may lead to defective alteration of NPC components. Indeed, kinases such as ERK, c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK), and p38 that are activated and redistributed by ROS have been detected at the NPC [189, 190]. Research from the lab of Gerald Hart [191] shows that oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide and sodium arsenite leads to increased levels of O-GlcNAc transferase and global O-GlcNAcylation in non-neuronal cell cultures. However, in neuroblastoma cells under prolonged oxidative stress, an initial increase and peak in cellular O-GlcNAc levels is followed by normalization of these levels, suggesting that O-GlcNAcylation is highly dynamic in stress responses [192]. In non-neuronal models such as HeLa cells, oxidant-induced signaling activated by diethyl maleate is associated with increased phosphorylation of importin-α1, CAS, Nup153, and Nup88, as well as O-GlcNAcylation of Nup153 in HeLa cells [193]. Crampton et al. [184] demonstrated that in addition to redistribution of Nup98, Nup62, and Nup214, diethyl maleate-induced oxidative stress altered their phosphorylation and O-GlcNAc status. Phosphorylation of these three Nups is increased and O-GlcNAcylation of Nup62 and Nup214 is increased under oxidative stress. These changes in Nup modifications are associated with increased binding of Nup62 to Crm1, Nup153 to Crm1, and reduced interactions between Nup62 and other FG-Nups. In DAergic neurons, O-GlcNAc has been shown to be essential for neuronal survival and synaptic release mechanisms. Selective knockout of O-GlcNAc transferase in DAergic neurons led to an early decrease in axonal arborization and neurodegeneration [194]. However, in PD models, the current research on O-GlcNAcylation has been primarily focused on the inhibitory effect of this modification on α-synuclein aggregation [195, 196]. Since nuclear pore proteins are some of the most abundantly O-GlcNAcylated proteins [197], investigation of the potential alterations in the O-GlcNAc status of Nups in PD is required. Altogether, the studies discussed in this section show that oxidative stress influences NCT and reduces the structural integrity of NPC components. Although most of these studies used non-neuronal oxidative stress models, it can be expected that the molecular pathways leading to NPC and NCT dysfunction may be similar in degenerating neurons under oxidative stress.

Nuclear pore disruption in other neurodegenerative diseases

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

Among neurodegenerative diseases, NPC alteration and NCT defects are most extensively characterized in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [18, 198]. ALS symptoms were originally thought to be exclusively motor in nature, but it is now known that cognitive and behavioral problems affect up to 50% of patients, with a smaller subset experiencing significant cognitive impairment and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Because of their overlap in molecular pathology, FTD and ALS are now considered two ends of a spectrum [199]. Approximately 10% of cases are familial and can be caused by mutations in over 20 currently identified genes, though most cases are sporadic. While hexanucleotide expansions to C9orf72 are the most common cause of both familial FTD and familial ALS, these mutations are also prevalent in patients with sporadic variants of the disease [198]. Dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) resulting from these mutations are toxic in nature and have been used widely in ALS-FTD models, though the mechanisms contributing to their characteristic aggregation remain elusive.

A study using ALS mouse models bearing mutations in the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) by Zhang et al. [200] was the first to demonstrate the abnormal distribution of proteins associated with NCT in the surviving anterior horn cells. In 2015, three independent studies conducted by separate groups further implicated NCT deficits in ALS pathogenesis, though with conflicting findings [8]. While one group validated the toxicity of DPRs at C9orf72 and identified several NCT-related genes that modified their toxicity [201], they found no abnormalities in RanGAP1 localization, contrary to two other studies published in the same period [202, 203]. These findings led to a subsequent influx of immunohistological studies into NCT alterations in ALS, which were quick to identify mislocalization and cytoplasmic accumulations of various NCT proteins with an emphasis on RanGAP1 alterations. Studies investigating the NPC were limited as they only observed small subsets of individual Nups, often produced findings that were not reproduced, and uncovered little about the structure of the NPC as a whole [198]. However, a recent structured illumination microscopy study assessed 23 different NPC components in ALS patient iPSC-derived neurons and post-mortem tissues expressing C9orf72 mutations, notably finding eight Nups that were lost in both models. This remarkable observation was accentuated by later findings of the same group, who observed decreases in five of those eight Nups in iPSC-derived neurons derived from patients with sporadic ALS [204]. In both studies, repeat RNA initially decreased the nuclear basket Nup Pom121, which led to reductions in the other implicated Nups and highlighted a separate pathological mechanism distinct from DPR-induced NCT dysfunction. This NPC injury was likely overlooked in other investigations because of their reliance on Drosophila and DPR models, which do not express or affect POM121, respectively [198].

TDP43, the protein comprising the hallmark aggregates in ALS, has also been the focus of numerous studies into NCT. Though few patients carry mutations in the TARDBP gene encoding TDP43, more than 95% of cases show cytoplasmic mislocalization and hyperphosphorylation of this RNA-binding protein [198, 199]. These cytoplasmic accumulations have been seen to obstruct the morphology of the NE and lead to cytoplasmic mislocalizations of various Nups [8, 198]. It is likely that impaired RNA metabolism, stemming from both TDP43 dysfunction and mutations in another RNA-binding protein, FUS, observed in patients, drives much of this downstream NPC injury [8]. Interestingly, different TDP43 abnormalities generate distinct NPC changes, reflecting the heterogeneity of the complex syndrome [198]. In a mutant-TDP43 Drosophila model, loss-of-function mutations in Nup50, Nup93, Nup98-96, Nup107, and Nup214 were all protective against retinal degeneration and locomotor deficits [205]. Nonetheless, the mechanisms behind suppression of neurotoxicity by these Nups are unknown, and it is worth noting that mutant Drosophila models do not completely reflect the intricacies of ALS in humans [8, 198].

Aside from C9orf72, FUS, and TDP43, alterations to various other genes and proteins implicated in ALS have been investigated in the context of NPC-mediated neurodegeneration [8, 198]. ALS-linked mutations in the small actin-binding protein profilin1 lead to significant disruption of NPC structure and NCT by destabilizing actin [206]. In a SOD1 mutant mouse model, RanGAP1 along with four Nups (Nup205, Nup107, Nup50, and Nup210) showed nuclear precipitation and cytoplasmic mislocalization patterns [207]. Though these results suggest some degree of NPC pathology in SOD1 ALS, the study lacked the functional assays and structural observations needed for a clearer picture of pathology in this variant of the disease. Nonetheless, mutations in SOD1, have also been implicated in various other diseases including PD [208].

Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders, accounting for 60–80% of all cases involving dementia-related memory and cognitive decline in patients [209]. This insidious disease is marked by neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated tau and extracellular accumulations of amyloid-beta, though TDP43 and α-synuclein pathology have been observed in patients as well [198, 209, 210]. The presence of neurofibrillary tau tangles in close proximity to the NE suggests the potential for their interference with NPC function and nuclear lamina organization [198]. Indeed, a study by Eftekharzadeh et al. [211] uncovered disturbances in Ran gradient with compromised nuclear import and export in AD, which were mediated by interactions between phospho-tau and the NPC. Specifically, soluble phospho-tau associates with the negatively charged C-terminus of Nup98, which displaces it from the central channel of the NPC into cytoplasmic and perinuclear regions. Once bound to cytoplasmic tau, Nup98 facilitates its fibrillation, leading to RanGAP1 mislocalization and downstream deficits in NCT. Interestingly, these interactions with Nup98 appear to depend solely on tau phosphorylation rather than its fibrillation, which was highlighted by the recovery of Nup98 in the NPC following reductions in soluble phospho-tau via doxycycline treatment. Nup62 was also seen to aggregate to perinuclear regions, though its functional consequences in this context are yet to be discovered. The 414 antibody that detects several FG-Nups besides Nup98 revealed abnormal distributions of these proteins within nuclear invaginations, alongside reduced expression of NPCs along the nuclear membrane, though they did not seem to interact with tau in its fibrillated state. Although this marker detected general abnormalities, two specific FG-Nups (Nup54, Pom121) and one non-FG-Nup (Nup133) did not seem to mislocalize or show reduced expression by themselves, indicating that the NPC undergoes a selective deterioration in AD. A study on NCT proteins in autosomal dominant tau mutant iPSC-derived cortical neurons revealed microtubule-mediated NE abnormalities and NCT disruption. These data suggest that impaired NCT is a pathological mechanism in AD and may also be involved in various neurodegenerative diseases with tau aggregation, such as PD [212].

In AD models, aberrant expression of the nuclear basket Nups Nup153 and Tpr also correlates with a decline in neurogenesis. Nup153 expression is found to be significantly reduced in AD neural stem cells, which decreases its interaction with Sox2, a transcription factor that is crucial for neural stem cell renewal. Nup153 levels also decrease in wild-type neural stem cells exposed to amyloid-β or a nitric oxide donor. Restoration of Nup153 levels in AD neural stem cells by treatment with antioxidant compounds enhanced their proliferation and reinstated their ability to differentiate, leading to increased expression of pro-neuronal genes, a higher proportion of cells expressing neuronal markers, and the adoption of a more mature neuronal phenotype [213]. This supports the notion that oxidative and nitrative stressors can impair NPCs in AD. Abnormal expression of Tpr was observed in Aβ pathology in mouse models of AD and in AD patients. The expression of Tpr influenced the NPC count in primary neural stem/progenitor cells, and dysregulated Tpr expression in hippocampal neural stem cells correlated with changes in the NPC count [214]. These findings reveal that Nup pathology also contributes to neurodegeneration through roles independent of NCT, suggesting that these Nups could serve as promising targets for restoring normal neural stem cell behavior and differentiation in neurodegenerative disorders.

Huntington’s disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a relatively rare neurodegenerative condition primarily recognized by its motor symptoms, though prodromal phases consisting of neurocognitive and psychiatric disturbances are common. This disease is driven by striatal atrophy with some loss in cortical regions, stemming from trinucleotide expansion mutations to the HTT (huntingtin) gene [198, 209]. Normally, translocation of huntingtin is mediated via interactions of its N-terminus with Tpr [8]. Mutant huntingtin shows increased phosphorylation at serine-16 of its N-terminus, disrupting its transport and leading to nuclear accumulation. Mutations in huntingtin protein also lead to aggregation of this protein with NPC and NCT components. In mouse models, Nup62, Nup88, RanGAP1, and Gle1 were present in these accumulations, which moved toward perinuclear regions as aging progressed [8, 198]. Remarkably, neuronal death in iPSC-derived neurons and Drosophila and mouse models was rescued by overexpression of RanGAP1 and Ran, highlighting the potential role of NPC and NCT dysfunction in HD [8]. Human post-mortem tissues showed a similar mislocalization and co-aggregation of huntingtin with Nup62 and RanGAP1, as observed in mice, though these aggregates were more abundant and smaller in size [198].

O-GlcNAc plays a crucial role in regulating proteins in the brain and is indispensable for neuronal survival and synaptic function [215]. Grima et al. [216] demonstrated that NPC O-GlcNAcylation is significantly reduced in the cortex of an HD mouse model. Moreover, elevation of O-GlcNAc levels by O-GlcNAcase inhibition using thiamet-G, rescued NCT defects and significantly reduced cell death in primary rat cortical neurons transfected with mutant disease-causing huntingtin protein.

Triple A syndrome

Triple A syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder, characterized by adrenal deficiency, achalasia, and alacrima, though neurological symptoms and nerve atrophy are common in patients [217]. The disease is caused by numerous mutations to the AAAS gene, encoding the nuclear pore component ALADIN. These mutations mislocalize the protein from the nuclear core of the NPC into the cytoplasm, without impacting NPC structure or nuclear morphology [8, 218]. Instead, the triple A syndrome pathology seems to be driven exclusively by deficits in ALADIN-mediated NCT. Among these deficits is the observed absence of nuclear FTH1, an iron-storage protein that is protective against oxidative stress and is transported into the nucleus by ALADIN [219]. The nuclear import of aprataxin and DNA Ligase I, two other proteins involved in the repair of single-strand DNA breaks induced by oxidative stress, is also reduced in patient-derived fibroblasts carrying AAAS mutations [220]. Therefore, ALADIN mislocalization leads to an increased vulnerability to oxidative stress which appears sufficient to drive the multi-system disorder.

Perspectives

Neuronal health and function strongly rely on the maintenance of nuclear integrity and compartmentalization facilitated by NPCs. Strong evidence supports the involvement of NPC and NCT dysfunction in aging and in the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases. Most studies on NPC and nuclear transport disruption have focused on non-neuronal oxidative stress models or neurodegenerative disease models with pathologic protein aggregates, such as ALS/FTD, AD, and HD models. However, specific alterations of Nups and the mechanisms leading to these alterations are influenced by the neural stressors and neuronal populations involved in disease pathogenesis. Common features shared among these diseases and PD include oxidative stress and the accumulation of insoluble protein aggregates and inclusion bodies in specific brain regions. Although mitochondrial dysfunction has not been directly associated with NPC impairment, independent studies [221, 222] have shown that ALS-linked mutations that disrupt the NPC, such as those in profilin1 and FUS, also lead to mitochondrial dyshomeostasis. Likewise, PD-linked mutations in LRRK2 and α-synuclein that affect NE architecture are also related to mitochondrial dysfunction [223, 224]. We propose a significant but currently underexplored connection exists between mitochondrial impairment and NPC alterations in neurodegeneration. Existing literature suggests that PD-related neurodegeneration is associated with alterations in DAergic neuronal nuclei, characterized by structural damage to the nucleus and mislocalization of crucial transcription factors. Importantly, these nuclear alterations seem to be driven by oxidative stress or α-synuclein pathology. The presence of protein aggregates and pathogenic mutations, coupled with ongoing oxidative stress typical of aging, can accelerate a transition towards a neuropathological state where these protein aggregates, along with ROS, further impair NPC functions. However, this potential pathological mechanism remains significantly understudied in the context of oxidative stress-induced DAergic neurodegeneration in PD. Therefore, we hope that our review highlights the clear imperative for additional exploratory research into the role of NPC and NCT dysfunction as they relate to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and protein aggregation in Parkinsonian and related neurodegeneration.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NE:

Nuclear envelope

NPC:

Nuclear pore complex

Nup:

Nucleoporin

NCT:

Nucleocytoplasmic transport

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

DA:

Dopamine

FG:

phenylalanine-glycine repeats

NLS:

Nuclear localization signal

NES:

Nuclear export signal

RCC1:

Regulator of chromosome condensation 1

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

MPTP:

1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine

6-OHDA:

6-hydroxydopamine

PINK1:

PTEN-induced kinase 1

CREB:

cyclic AMP response element-binding protein

ERK:

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

LRRK2:

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2

O-GlcNAc:

O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine

JNK:

c-Jun N-terminal Kinase

PGC1α:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α

iPSC:

Induced pluripotent stem cell

DPR:

Dipeptide repeat protein

SOD1:

Superoxide dismutase 1

ALS:

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

FTD:

Frontotemporal dementia

FUS:

Fused in sarcoma

TDP43:

Transactive response DNA binding protein of 43 kDa

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

HD:

Huntington’s disease

References

  1. Cook A, Bono F, Jinek M, Conti E. Structural biology of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:647–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Doye V, Hurt E. From nucleoporins to nuclear pore complexes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9(3):401–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ptak C, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW. The multifunctional nuclear pore complex: a platform for controlling gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;28:46–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ribbeck K, Görlich D. The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. EMBO J. 2002;21(11):2664–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toyama B, Arrojo e Drigo R, Lev-Ram V, Ramachandra R, Deerinck T, Lechene C, Ellisman M, Hetzer M. Visualization of long-lived proteins reveals age mosaicism within nuclei of postmitotic cells. J Cell Biol. 2018;218:jcb201809123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hetzer MW. The role of the nuclear pore complex in aging of post-mitotic cells. Aging. 2010;2(2):74–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Savas JN, Toyama BH, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd, Hetzer MW. Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain. Science. 2012;335(6071):942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spead O, Zaepfel BL, Rothstein JD. Nuclear Pore Dysfunction in Neurodegeneration. Neurotherapeutics. 2022;19(4):1050–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cristi AC, Rapuri S, Coyne AN. Nuclear pore complex and nucleocytoplasmic transport disruption in neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett. 2023.

  10. Patel V, Chu C. Nuclear transport, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4:215–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Williams R, Alber F, Eswar N, Chait BT, Rout MP, Sali A. Simple Fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(7):2172–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin DH, Hoelz A. The structure of the Nuclear Pore Complex (an update). Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:725–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. von Appen A, Beck M. Structure determination of the Nuclear Pore Complex with three-dimensional Cryo electron Microscopy. J Mol Biol. 2016;428(10 Pt A):2001–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hakhverdyan Z, Molloy KR, Keegan S, Herricks T, Lepore DM, Munson M, Subbotin RI, Fenyö D, Aitchison JD, Fernandez-Martinez J, et al. Dissecting the Structural dynamics of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Mol Cell. 2021;81(1):153–e165157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Denning DP, Patel SS, Uversky V, Fink AL, Rexach M. Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2450–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strawn LA, Shen T, Shulga N, Goldfarb DS, Wente SR. Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(3):197–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dekker M, Van der Giessen E, Onck PR. Phase separation of intrinsically disordered FG-Nups is driven by highly dynamic FG motifs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023, 120(25):e2221804120.

  18. Khalil B, Linsenmeier M, Smith CL, Shorter J, Rossoll W. Nuclear-import receptors as gatekeepers of pathological phase transitions in ALS/FTD. Mol Neurodegener. 2024;19(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beck M, Hurt E. The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(2):73–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bui Khanh H, von Appen A, DiGuilio Amanda L, Ori A, Sparks L, Mackmull M-T, Bock T, Hagen W, Andrés-Pons A, Glavy Joseph S, et al. Integrated Structural Analysis of the Human Nuclear Pore Complex Scaffold. Cell. 2013;155(6):1233–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kampmann M, Blobel G. Three-dimensional structure and flexibility of a membrane-coating module of the nuclear pore complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(7):782–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boehmer T, Enninga J, Dales S, Blobel G, Zhong H. Depletion of a single nucleoporin, Nup107, prevents the assembly of a subset of nucleoporins into the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(3):981–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Walther TC, Alves A, Pickersgill H, Loïodice I, Hetzer M, Galy V, Hülsmann BB, Köcher T, Wilm M, Allen T, et al. The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell. 2003;113(2):195–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandez-Martinez J, Rout MP. One Ring to rule them all? Structural and functional diversity in the Nuclear Pore Complex. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46(7):595–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eisenhardt N, Redolfi J, Antonin W. Interaction of Nup53 with Ndc1 and Nup155 is required for nuclear pore complex assembly. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 4):908–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosalaganti S, Obarska-Kosinska A, Siggel M, Taniguchi R, Turoňová B, Zimmerli CE, Buczak K, Schmidt FH, Margiotta E, Mackmull M-T, et al. AI-based structure prediction empowers integrative structural analysis of human nuclear pores. Science. 2022;376(6598):eabm9506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakuma S, Raices M, Borlido J, Guglielmi V, Zhu EYS, D’Angelo MA. Inhibition of nuclear pore complex formation selectively induces Cancer Cell Death. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(1):176–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Funakoshi T, Maeshima K, Yahata K, Sugano S, Imamoto F, Imamoto N. Two distinct human POM121 genes: requirement for the formation of nuclear pore complexes. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(25):4910–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bindra D, Mishra RK. In pursuit of distinctiveness: transmembrane nucleoporins and their Disease associations. Front Oncol. 2021;11:784319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mansfeld J, Güttinger S, Hawryluk-Gara LA, Panté N, Mall M, Galy V, Haselmann U, Mühlhäusser P, Wozniak RW, Mattaj IW, et al. The conserved transmembrane nucleoporin NDC1 is required for nuclear pore complex assembly in vertebrate cells. Mol Cell. 2006;22(1):93–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kind B, Koehler K, Lorenz M, Huebner A. The nuclear pore complex protein ALADIN is anchored via NDC1 but not via POM121 and GP210 in the nuclear envelope. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390(2):205–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Funakoshi T, Clever M, Watanabe A, Imamoto N. Localization of Pom121 to the inner nuclear membrane is required for an early step of interphase nuclear pore complex assembly. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(7):1058–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Talamas JA, Hetzer MW. POM121 and Sun1 play a role in early steps of interphase NPC assembly. J Cell Biol. 2011;194(1):27–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell JM, Mansfeld J, Capitanio J, Kutay U, Wozniak RW. Pom121 links two essential subcomplexes of the nuclear pore complex core to the membrane. J Cell Biol. 2010;191(3):505–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu T, Guan T, Gerace L. Molecular and functional characterization of the p62 complex, an assembly of nuclear pore complex glycoproteins. J Cell Biol. 1996;134(3):589–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chug H, Trakhanov S, Hülsmann BB, Pleiner T, Görlich D. Crystal structure of the metazoan Nup62•Nup58•Nup54 nucleoporin complex. Science. 2015;350(6256):106–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hampoelz B, Andres-Pons A, Kastritis P, Beck M. Structure and assembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Annual Rev Biophys. 2019;48(1):515–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Finlay DR, Meier E, Bradley P, Horecka J, Forbes DJ. A complex of nuclear pore proteins required for pore function. J Cell Biol. 1991;114(1):169–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Percipalle P, Clarkson WD, Kent HM, Rhodes D, Stewart M. Molecular interactions between the importin α/β heterodimer and proteins involved in vertebrate nuclear protein import11Edited by J. Karn. J Mol Biol. 1997;266(4):722–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Macara IG. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65(4):570–94. table of contents.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Terry LJ, Wente SR. Flexible gates: dynamic topologies and functions for FG nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8(12):1814–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Solmaz SR, Chauhan R, Blobel G, Melčák I. Molecular architecture of the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex. Cell. 2011;147(3):590–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kabachinski G, Schwartz TU. The nuclear pore complex–structure and function at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(3):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Frey S, Richter RP, Görlich D. FG-Rich repeats of Nuclear Pore proteins Form a three-Dimensional Meshwork with Hydrogel-Like Properties. Science. 2006;314(5800):815–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hülsmann Bastian B, Labokha Aksana A, Görlich D. The permeability of Reconstituted Nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell. 2012;150(4):738–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ng SC, Biswas A, Huyton T, Schünemann J, Reber S, Görlich D. Barrier properties of Nup98 FG phases ruled by FG motif identity and inter-FG spacer length. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Petrovic S, Samanta D, Perriches T, Bley CJ, Thierbach K, Brown B, Nie S, Mobbs GW, Stevens TA, Liu X, et al. Architecture of the linker-scaffold in the nuclear pore. Science. 2022;376(6598):eabm9798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Oka M, Asally M, Yasuda Y, Ogawa Y, Tachibana T, Yoneda Y. The mobile FG nucleoporin Nup98 is a cofactor for Crm1-dependent protein export. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(11):1885–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bangs P, Burke B, Powers C, Craig R, Purohit A, Doxsey S. Functional analysis of Tpr: identification of nuclear pore complex association and nuclear localization domains and a role in mRNA export. J Cell Biol. 1998;143(7):1801–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Guan T, Kehlenbach RH, Schirmer EC, Kehlenbach A, Fan F, Clurman BE, Arnheim N, Gerace L. Nup50, a nucleoplasmically oriented nucleoporin with a role in nuclear protein export. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(15):5619–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Panté N, Aebi U. Molecular dissection of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;31(2):153–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:613–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Krull S, Thyberg J, Björkroth B, Rackwitz HR, Cordes VC. Nucleoporins as components of the nuclear pore complex core structure and tpr as the architectural element of the nuclear basket. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(9):4261–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tingey M, Li Y, Yu W, Young A, Yang W. Spelling out the roles of individual nucleoporins in nuclear export of mRNA. Nucleus (Calcutta). 2022;13(1):172–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. David-Watine B. Silencing nuclear pore protein Tpr elicits a senescent-like phenotype in cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao CL, Mahboobi SH, Moussavi-Baygi R, Mofrad MR. The interaction of CRM1 and the nuclear pore protein Tpr. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e93709.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. McCloskey A, Ibarra A, Hetzer MW. Tpr regulates the total number of nuclear pore complexes per cell nucleus. Genes Dev. 2018;32(19–20):1321–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lindsay ME, Plafker K, Smith AE, Clurman BE, Macara IG. Npap60/Nup50 is a tri-stable switch that stimulates importin-alpha:beta-mediated nuclear protein import. Cell. 2002;110(3):349–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Makise M, Mackay DR, Elgort S, Shankaran SS, Adam SA, Ullman KS. The Nup153-Nup50 protein interface and its role in nuclear import. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(46):38515–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Duheron V, Chatel G, Sauder U, Oliveri V, Fahrenkrog B. Structural characterization of altered nucleoporin Nup153 expression in human cells by thin-section electron microscopy. Nucleus (Calcutta). 2014;5(6):601–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Li P, Noegel AA. Inner nuclear envelope protein SUN1 plays a prominent role in mammalian mRNA export. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(20):9874–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Walther TC, Fornerod M, Pickersgill H, Goldberg M, Allen TD, Mattaj IW. The nucleoporin Nup153 is required for nuclear pore basket formation, nuclear pore complex anchoring and import of a subset of nuclear proteins. EMBO J. 2001;20(20):5703–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lenz-Böhme B, Wismar J, Fuchs S, Reifegerste R, Buchner E, Betz H, Schmitt B. Insertional mutation of the Drosophila nuclear lamin Dm0 gene results in defective nuclear envelopes, clustering of nuclear pore complexes, and accumulation of annulate lamellae. J Cell Biol. 1997;137(5):1001–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Bley CJ, Nie S, Mobbs GW, Petrovic S, Gres AT, Liu X, Mukherjee S, Harvey S, Huber FM, Lin DH, et al. Architecture of the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore. Science. 2022;376(6598):eabm9129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Werner A, Flotho A, Melchior F. The RanBP2/RanGAP1SUMO1/Ubc9 complex is a multisubunit SUMO E3 ligase. Mol Cell. 2012;46(3):287–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Mahadevan K, Zhang H, Akef A, Cui XA, Gueroussov S, Cenik C, Roth FP, Palazzo AF. RanBP2/Nup358 potentiates the translation of a subset of mRNAs encoding secretory proteins. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(4):e1001545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fornerod M, van Deursen J, van Baal S, Reynolds A, Davis D, Murti KG, Fransen J, Grosveld G. The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88. EMBO J. 1997;16(4):807–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Katahira J, Strässer K, Podtelejnikov A, Mann M, Jung JU, Hurt E. The Mex67p-mediated nuclear mRNA export pathway is conserved from yeast to human. EMBO J. 1999;18(9):2593–609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kendirgi F, Rexer DJ, Alcázar-Román AR, Onishko HM, Wente SR. Interaction between the shuttling mRNA export factor Gle1 and the nucleoporin hCG1: a conserved mechanism in the export of Hsp70 mRNA. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(9):4304–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. von Moeller H, Basquin C, Conti E. The mRNA export protein DBP5 binds RNA and the cytoplasmic nucleoporin NUP214 in a mutually exclusive manner. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(3):247–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Alcázar-Román AR, Tran EJ, Guo S, Wente SR. Inositol hexakisphosphate and Gle1 activate the DEAD-box protein Dbp5 for nuclear mRNA export. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(7):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ren Y, Seo H-S, Blobel G, Hoelz A. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction between the nucleoporin Nup98 and the mRNA export factor Rae1. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2010, 107(23):10406–10411.

  73. Rajoo S, Vallotton P, Onischenko E, Weis K. Stoichiometry and compositional plasticity of the yeast nuclear pore complex revealed by quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(17):E3969–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Kim SJ, Fernandez-Martinez J, Nudelman I, Shi Y, Zhang W, Raveh B, Herricks T, Slaughter BD, Hogan JA, Upla P, et al. Integrative structure and functional anatomy of a nuclear pore complex. Nature. 2018;555(7697):475–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Nuclear Pore Complexes: Global Conservation and Local Variation. Curr Biol. 2018, 28(11):R674-R677.

  76. Tran EJ, Wente SR. Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: life on the Edge. Cell. 2006;125(6):1041–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Beck M, Förster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, Baumeister W, Medalia O. Nuclear Pore Complex structure and Dynamics revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography. Science. 2004;306(5700):1387–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Sakiyama Y, Mazur A, Kapinos LE, Lim RYH. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the nuclear pore complex transport barrier resolved by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11(8):719–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. D’Angelo MA, Raices M, Panowski SH, Hetzer MW. Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell. 2009;136(2):284–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Toyama Brandon H, Savas Jeffrey N, Park Sung K, Harris Michael S, Ingolia Nicholas T, Yates John R III. Hetzer Martin W: identification of long-lived proteins reveals exceptional Stability of essential Cellular structures. Cell. 2013;154(5):971–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Rabut G, Doye V, Ellenberg J. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(11):1114–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Timney BL, Raveh B, Mironska R, Trivedi JM, Kim SJ, Russel D, Wente SR, Sali A, Rout MP. Simple rules for passive diffusion through the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 2016;215(1):57–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Cole CN, Hammell CM. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: driving and directing transport. Curr Biol. 1998;8(11):R368–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Wing CE, Fung HYJ, Chook YM. Karyopherin-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(5):307–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Izaurralde E, Kutay U, von Kobbe C, Mattaj IW, Görlich D. The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J. 1997;16(21):6535–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Kalita J, Kapinos LE, Lim RYH. On the asymmetric partitioning of nucleocytoplasmic transport – recent insights and open questions. J Cell Sci 2021, 134(7).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Stewart M. Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(3):195–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lui K, Huang Y. RanGTPase: a Key Regulator of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 2009;1(3):148–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Köhler A, Hurt E. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(10):761–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Carmody SR, Wente SR. mRNA nuclear export at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 12):1933–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell. 2010;140(3):360–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell. 2010;140(3):372–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Menon BB, Sarma NJ, Pasula S, Deminoff SJ, Willis KA, Barbara KE, Andrews B, Santangelo GM. Reverse recruitment: the Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(16):5749–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. D’Angelo MA. Nuclear pore complexes as hubs for gene regulation. Nucleus (Calcutta). 2018;9(1):142–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ibarra A, Benner C, Tyagi S, Cool J, Hetzer MW. Nucleoporin-mediated regulation of cell identity genes. Genes Dev. 2016;30(20):2253–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Jacinto FV, Benner C, Hetzer MW. The nucleoporin Nup153 regulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency through gene silencing. Genes Dev. 2015;29(12):1224–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Vaquerizas JM, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe NM, Akhtar A. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(2):e1000846.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Capelson M. You are who your friends are—nuclear pore proteins as components of chromatin-binding complexes. FEBS Lett. 2023.

  99. Kuhn TM, Capelson M. Nuclear pore proteins in regulation of chromatin state. Cells 2019, 8(11).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Colussi C, Grassi C. Epigenetic regulation of neural stem cells: the emerging role of Nucleoporins. Stem Cells. 2021;39(12):1601–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Simon M-N, Dubrana K, Palancade B. On the edge: how nuclear pore complexes rule genome stability. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2024;84:102150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Mackay DR, Howa AC, Werner TL, Ullman KS. Nup153 and Nup50 promote recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA repair foci by antagonizing BRCA1-dependent events. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(19):3347–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Moudry P, Lukas C, Macurek L, Neumann B, Heriche JK, Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J, Hodny Z, Lukas J, Bartek J. Nucleoporin NUP153 guards genome integrity by promoting nuclear import of 53BP1. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(5):798–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. de Miranda BR, Greenamyre JT. CHAPTER 1 etiology and Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Oxidative stress and Redox Signalling in Parkinson’s Disease. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2017. pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Kouli A, Torsney KM, Kuan W-L. Parkinson’s Disease: Etiology, Neuropathology, and Pathogenesis. 2018.

  106. Xia Q, Liao L, Cheng D, Duong DM, Gearing M, Lah JJ, Levey AI, Peng J. Proteomic identification of novel proteins associated with Lewy bodies. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3850–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Postuma RB, Aarsland D, Barone P, Burn DJ, Hawkes CH, Oertel W, Ziemssen T. Identifying prodromal Parkinson’s disease: pre-motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2012;27(5):617–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Funayama M, Nishioka K, Li Y, Hattori N. Molecular genetics of Parkinson’s disease: contributions and global trends. J Hum Genet. 2023;68(3):125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Ball N, Teo WP, Chandra S, Chapman J. Parkinson’s Disease and the Environment. Front Neurol. 2019;10:218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Pouchieu C, Piel C, Carles C, Gruber A, Helmer C, Tual S, Marcotullio E, Lebailly P, Baldi I. Pesticide use in agriculture and Parkinson’s disease in the AGRICAN cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(1):299–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Narayan S, Liew Z, Bronstein JM, Ritz B. Occupational pesticide use and Parkinson’s disease in the Parkinson Environment Gene (PEG) study. Environ Int. 2017;107:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Vellingiri B, Suriyanarayanan A, Abraham KS, Venkatesan D, Iyer M, Raj N, Gopalakrishnan AV. Influence of heavy metals in Parkinson’s disease: an overview. J Neurol. 2022;269(11):5798–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Hindle JV. Ageing, neurodegeneration and Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing. 2010;39(2):156–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Willis AW, Roberts E, Beck JC, Fiske B, Ross W, Savica R, Van Den Eeden SK, Tanner CM, Marras C, Alcalay R, et al. Incidence of Parkinson disease in North America. Npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2022;8(1):170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Schapira AHV, Cooper JM, Dexter D, Jenner P, Clark JB, Marsden CD. MITOCHONDRIAL COMPLEX I DEFICIENCY IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE. Lancet. 1989;333(8649):1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Mizuno Y, Ohta S, Tanaka M, Takamiya S, Suzuki K, Sato T, Oya H, Ozawa T, Kagawa Y. Deficiencies in complex I subunits of the respiratory chain in Parkinson’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;163(3):1450–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Keeney PM, Xie J, Capaldi RA, Bennett JP Jr. Parkinson’s disease brain mitochondrial complex I has oxidatively damaged subunits and is functionally impaired and misassembled. J Neurosci. 2006;26(19):5256–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Toomey CE, Heywood WE, Evans JR, Lachica J, Pressey SN, Foti SC, Al Shahrani M, D’Sa K, Hargreaves IP, Heales S, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key pathological driver of early stage Parkinson’s. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022;10(1):134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Chen C, McDonald D, Blain A, Mossman E, Atkin K, Marusich MF, Capaldi R, Bone L, Smith A, Filby A, et al. Parkinson’s disease neurons exhibit alterations in mitochondrial quality control proteins. Npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2023;9(1):120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Pacelli C, Giguère N, Bourque MJ, Lévesque M, Slack RS, Trudeau L. Elevated mitochondrial bioenergetics and axonal arborization size are key contributors to the vulnerability of dopamine neurons. Curr Biol. 2015;25(18):2349–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Haddad D, Nakamura K. Understanding the susceptibility of dopamine neurons to mitochondrial stressors in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(24 Pt A):3702–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Surmeier DJ. Determinants of dopaminergic neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease. Febs j. 2018;285(19):3657–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Meiser J, Weindl D, Hiller K. Complexity of dopamine metabolism. Cell Communication Signal. 2013;11(1):34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Helley MP, Pinnell J, Sportelli C, Tieu K. Mitochondria: a common target for genetic mutations and environmental toxicants in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Genet. 2017;8:177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Li W, Fu Y, Halliday GM, Sue CM. PARK genes Link mitochondrial dysfunction and alpha-Synuclein Pathology in sporadic Parkinson’s Disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:612476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Dopaminergic Neurons Derived from Patients with LRRK2-and SNCA-Associated Genetic Forms of Parkinson’s Disease. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023, 45(10):8395–8411.

  127. Park J-S, Davis RL, Sue CM. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease: new mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18(5):21–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P, Lichtner P, Farrer M, Lincoln S, Kachergus J, Hulihan M, Uitti RJ, Calne DB, et al. Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron. 2004;44(4):601–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Singh A, Zhi L, Zhang H. LRRK2 and mitochondria: recent advances and current views. Brain Res. 2019;1702:96–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Pickrell AM, Youle RJ. The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2015;85(2):257–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Ge P, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. PINK1 and Parkin mitochondrial quality control: a source of regional vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Davis GC, Williams AC, Markey SP, Ebert MH, Caine ED, Reichert CM, Kopin IJ. Chronic parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatry Res. 1979;1(3):249–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Langston JW, Ballard P, Tetrud JW, Irwin I. Chronic parkinsonism in humans due to a product of meperidine-analog synthesis. Science. 1983;219(4587):979–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Spivey A. Rotenone and paraquat linked to Parkinson’s disease: human exposure study supports years of animal studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):A259–259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Tanner CM, Kamel F, Ross GW, Hoppin JA, Goldman SM, Korell M, Marras C, Bhudhikanok GS, Kasten M, Chade AR, et al. Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson’s disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):866–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Pezzoli G, Cereda E. Exposure to pesticides or solvents and risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2013;80(22):2035–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Huang M, Bargues-Carot A, Riaz Z, Wickham H, Zenitsky G, Jin H, Anantharam V, Kanthasamy A, Kanthasamy AG. Impact of Environmental Risk Factors on Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Neuroinflammation, Protein Misfolding, and Oxidative Stress in the Etiopathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23(18).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Slézia A, Hegedüs P, Rusina E, Lengyel K, Solari N, Kaszas A, Balázsfi D, Botzanowski B, Acerbo E, Missey F, et al. Behavioral, neural and ultrastructural alterations in a graded-dose 6-OHDA mouse model of early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):19478.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Pyatha S, Kim H, Lee D, Kim K. Association between Heavy Metal Exposure and Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of the Mechanisms Related to Oxidative Stress. Antioxid (Basel) 2022, 11(12).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Reeve A, Simcox E, Turnbull D. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: why is advancing age the biggest risk factor? Ageing Res Rev. 2014;14(100):19–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Ludtmann MH, Angelova PR, Ninkina NN, Gandhi S, Buchman VL, Abramov AY. Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein exerts a physiological role on Brain ATP synthase. J Neurosci. 2016;36(41):10510–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Norris KL, Hao R, Chen LF, Lai CH, Kapur M, Shaughnessy PJ, Chou D, Yan J, Taylor JP, Engelender S, et al. Convergence of Parkin, PINK1, and α-Synuclein on stress-induced mitochondrial morphological remodeling. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(22):13862–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Devi L, Raghavendran V, Prabhu BM, Avadhani NG, Anandatheerthavarada HK. Mitochondrial Import and Accumulation of α-Synuclein impair complex I in human dopaminergic neuronal cultures and Parkinson Disease Brain*. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(14):9089–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Ludtmann MHR, Angelova PR, Horrocks MH, Choi ML, Rodrigues M, Baev AY, Berezhnov AV, Yao Z, Little D, Banushi B, et al. : α-synuclein oligomers interact with ATP synthase and open the permeability transition pore in Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Esteves AR, Arduíno DM, Silva DF, Oliveira CR, Cardoso SM. Mitochondrial dysfunction: the Road to Alpha-Synuclein oligomerization in PD. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2011:693761.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Choi ML, Chappard A, Singh BP, Maclachlan C, Rodrigues M, Fedotova EI, Berezhnov AV, De S, Peddie CJ, Athauda D, et al. Pathological structural conversion of α-synuclein at the mitochondria induces neuronal toxicity. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(9):1134–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Lurette O, Martín-Jiménez R, Khan M, Sheta R, Jean S, Schofield M, Teixeira M, Rodriguez-Aller R, Perron I, Oueslati A, et al. Aggregation of alpha-synuclein disrupts mitochondrial metabolism and induce mitophagy via cardiolipin externalization. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(11):729.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Schildknecht S, Gerding HR, Karreman C, Drescher M, Lashuel HA, Outeiro TF, Di Monte DA, Leist M. Oxidative and nitrative alpha-synuclein modifications and proteostatic stress: implications for disease mechanisms and interventions in synucleinopathies. J Neurochem. 2013;125(4):491–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Li H-Y, Liu D-S, Zhang Y-B, Rong H, Zhang X-J. The interaction between alpha-synuclein and mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Biophys Chem. 2023;303:107122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Dias V, Junn E, Mouradian MM. The role of oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2013;3(4):461–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Alam ZI, Jenner A, Daniel SE, Lees AJ, Cairns N, Marsden CD, Jenner P, Halliwell B. Oxidative DNA damage in the parkinsonian brain: an apparent selective increase in 8-hydroxyguanine levels in substantia nigra. J Neurochem. 1997;69(3):1196–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Chalovich EM, Zhu J-h, Caltagarone J, Bowser R, Chu CT. Functional repression of cAMP response element in 6-Hydroxydopamine-treated neuronal cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(26):17870–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Sakamoto K, Karelina K, Obrietan K. CREB: a multifaceted regulator of neuronal plasticity and protection. J Neurochem. 2011;116(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Zhu JH, Kulich SM, Oury TD, Chu CT. Cytoplasmic aggregates of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases in Lewy body diseases. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(6):2087–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Ferrer I, Blanco R, Carmona M, Puig B, Barrachina M, Gómez C, Ambrosio S. Active, phosphorylation-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK), stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK), and p38 kinase expression in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108(12):1383–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Dagda RK, Zhu J, Kulich SM, Chu CT. Mitochondrially localized ERK2 regulates mitophagy and autophagic cell stress: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Autophagy. 2008;4(6):770–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Maeder CI, Kim J-I, Liang X, Kaganovsky K, Shen A, Li Q, Li Z, Wang S, Xu XZS, Li JB, et al. The THO complex coordinates transcripts for Synapse Development and dopamine neuron survival. Cell. 2018;174(6):1436–e14491420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Bitetto G, Di Fonzo A. Nucleo–cytoplasmic transport defects and protein aggregates in neurodegeneration. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2020;9(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Goers J, Manning-Bog AB, McCormack AL, Millett IS, Doniach S, Di Monte DA, Uversky VN, Fink AL. Nuclear localization of alpha-synuclein and its interaction with histones. Biochemistry. 2003;42(28):8465–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Zhou M, Xu S, Mi J, Uéda K, Chan P. Nuclear translocation of alpha-synuclein increases susceptibility of MES23.5 cells to oxidative stress. Brain Res. 2013;1500:19–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Koss DJ, Erskine D, Porter A, Palmoski P, Menon H, Todd OGJ, Leite M, Attems J, Outeiro TF. Nuclear alpha-synuclein is present in the human brain and is modified in dementia with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022;10(1):98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Pinho R, Paiva I, Jercic KG, Fonseca-Ornelas L, Gerhardt E, Fahlbusch C, Garcia-Esparcia P, Kerimoglu C, Pavlou MAS, Villar-Piqué A, et al. Nuclear localization and phosphorylation modulate pathological effects of alpha-synuclein. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(1):31–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Siddiqui A, Chinta SJ, Mallajosyula JK, Rajagopolan S, Hanson I, Rane A, Melov S, Andersen JK. Selective binding of nuclear alpha-synuclein to the PGC1alpha promoter under conditions of oxidative stress may contribute to losses in mitochondrial function: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(4):993–1003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Pasha T, Zatorska A, Sharipov D, Rogelj B, Hortobágyi T, Hirth F. Karyopherin abnormalities in neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Brain. 2021;144(10):2915–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Geertsma HM, Suk TR, Ricke KM, Horsthuis K, Parmasad J-LA, Fisk ZA, Callaghan SM, Rousseaux MWC. Constitutive nuclear accumulation of endogenous alpha-synuclein in mice causes motor impairment and cortical dysfunction, independent of protein aggregation. Hum Mol Genet. 2022;31(21):3613–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Schell H, Hasegawa T, Neumann M, Kahle PJ. Nuclear and neuritic distribution of serine-129 phosphorylated alpha-synuclein in transgenic mice. Neuroscience. 2009;160(4):796–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Chen V, Moncalvo M, Tringali D, Tagliafierro L, Shriskanda A, Ilich E, Dong W, Kantor B, Chiba-Falek O. The mechanistic role of alpha-synuclein in the nucleus: impaired nuclear function caused by familial Parkinson’s disease SNCA mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2020;29(18):3107–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Rousseaux MW, de Haro M, Lasagna-Reeves CA, De Maio A, Park J, Jafar-Nejad P, Al-Ramahi I, Sharma A, See L, Lu N et al. TRIM28 regulates the nuclear accumulation and toxicity of both alpha-synuclein and tau. Elife 2016, 5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Ma K-L, Song L-K, Yuan Y-H, Zhang Y, Han N, Gao K, Chen N-H. The nuclear accumulation of alpha-synuclein is mediated by importin alpha and promotes neurotoxicity by accelerating the cell cycle. Neuropharmacology. 2014;82:132–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Tagliafierro L, Zamora ME, Chiba-Falek O. Multiplication of the SNCA locus exacerbates neuronal nuclear aging. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(3):407–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Liu GH, Qu J, Suzuki K, Nivet E, Li M, Montserrat N, Yi F, Xu X, Ruiz S, Zhang W, et al. Progressive degeneration of human neural stem cells caused by pathogenic LRRK2. Nature. 2012;491(7425):603–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Shani V, Safory H, Szargel R, Wang N, Cohen T, Elghani FA, Hamza H, Savyon M, Radzishevsky I, Shaulov L, et al. Physiological and pathological roles of LRRK2 in the nuclear envelope integrity. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(23):3982–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Tsika E, Kannan M, Foo CS, Dikeman D, Glauser L, Gellhaar S, Galter D, Knott GW, Dawson TM, Dawson VL, et al. Conditional expression of Parkinson’s disease-related R1441C LRRK2 in midbrain dopaminergic neurons of mice causes nuclear abnormalities without neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;71:345–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Um JW, Min DS, Rhim H, Kim J, Paik SR, Chung KC. Parkin Ubiquitinates and promotes the degradation of RanBP2*. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(6):3595–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. Cho K-i, Searle K, Webb M, Yi H, Ferreira PA. Ranbp2 haploinsufficiency mediates distinct cellular and biochemical phenotypes in brain and retinal dopaminergic and glia cells elicited by the parkinsonian neurotoxin, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(20):3511–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Krisko A, Radman M. Protein damage, ageing and age-related diseases. Open Biol. 2019;9(3):180249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Reeg S, Grune T. Protein oxidation in aging: does it play a role in aging progression? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;23(3):239–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Kristiani L, Kim Y. The interplay between oxidative stress and the Nuclear Lamina contributes to Laminopathies and Age-Related diseases. In: Cells 12; 2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Heo J. Redox regulation of Ran GTPase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376(3):568–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Chatterjee M, Paschal BM. Disruption of the ran system by Cysteine Oxidation of the Nucleotide Exchange factor RCC1. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(3):566–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Kodiha M, Chu A, Matusiewicz N, Stochaj U. Multiple mechanisms promote the inhibition of classical nuclear import upon exposure to severe oxidative stress. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(8):862–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Datta S, Snow CJ, Paschal BM. A pathway linking oxidative stress and the ran GTPase system in progeria. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25(8):1202–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Kodiha M, Tran D, Qian C, Morogan A, Presley JF, Brown CM, Stochaj U. Oxidative stress mislocalizes and retains transport factor importin-α and nucleoporins Nup153 and Nup88 in nuclei where they generate high molecular mass complexes. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Cell Res. 2008;1783(3):405–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. Crampton N, Kodiha M, Shrivastava S, Umar R, Stochaj U. Oxidative stress inhibits nuclear protein export by multiple mechanisms that target FG nucleoporins and Crm1. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(24):5106–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  185. Kodiha M, Stochaj U. Nuclear transport: a switch for the oxidative stress-signaling circuit? J Signal Transduct. 2012, 2012:208650.

  186. Mahboubi H, Seganathy E, Kong D, Stochaj U. Identification of novel stress Granule Components that are involved in Nuclear Transport. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e68356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Mizuguchi-Hata C, Ogawa Y, Oka M, Yoneda Y. Quantitative regulation of nuclear pore complex proteins by O-GlcNAcylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(12):2682–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Kosako H, Imamoto N. Phosphorylation of nucleoporins: signal transduction-mediated regulation of their interaction with nuclear transport receptors. Nucleus (Austin Tex). 2010;1(4):309–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Faustino RS, Maddaford TG, Pierce GN. Mitogen activated protein kinase at the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(4):928–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. Kodiha M, Bański P, Stochaj U. Interplay between MEK and PI3 kinase signaling regulates the subcellular localization of protein kinases ERK1/2 and akt upon oxidative stress. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(12):1987–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Zachara NE, O’Donnell N, Cheung WD, Mercer JJ, Marth JD, Hart GW. Dynamic O-GlcNAc modification of Nucleocytoplasmic Proteins in response to stress: a SURVIVAL RESPONSE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS*. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(29):30133–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. Kátai E, Pál J, Poór VS, Purewal R, Miseta A, Nagy T. Oxidative stress induces transient O-GlcNAc elevation and tau dephosphorylation in SH-SY5Y cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(12):2269–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Kodiha M, Tran D, Morogan A, Qian C, Stochaj U. Dissecting the signaling events that impact classical nuclear import and target nuclear transport factors. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(12):e8420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Lee BE, Kim HY, Kim HJ, Jeong H, Kim BG, Lee HE, Lee J, Kim HB, Lee SE, Yang YR, et al. O-GlcNAcylation regulates dopamine neuron function, survival and degeneration in Parkinson disease. Brain. 2020;143(12):3699–716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  195. Tavassoly O, Yue J, Vocadlo DJ. Pharmacological inhibition and knockdown of O-GlcNAcase reduces cellular internalization of α-synuclein preformed fibrils. Febs j. 2021;288(2):452–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Levine PM, Galesic A, Balana AT, Mahul-Mellier AL, Navarro MX, De Leon CA, Lashuel HA, Pratt MR. α-Synuclein O-GlcNAcylation alters aggregation and toxicity, revealing certain residues as potential inhibitors of Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(5):1511–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Hart GW, Housley MP, Slawson C. Cycling of O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine on nucleocytoplasmic proteins. Nature. 2007;446(7139):1017–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. Coyne AN, Rothstein JD. Nuclear pore complexes — a doorway to neural injury in neurodegeneration. Nat Reviews Neurol. 2022;18(6):348–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. Masrori P, Van Damme P. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(10):1918–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Zhang J, Ito H, Wate R, Ohnishi S, Nakano S, Kusaka H. Altered distributions of nucleocytoplasmic transport-related proteins in the spinal cord of a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112(6):673–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  201. Jovičić A, Mertens J, Boeynaems S, Bogaert E, Chai N, Yamada SB, Paul JW, Sun S, Herdy JR, Bieri G, et al. Modifiers of C9orf72 dipeptide repeat toxicity connect nucleocytoplasmic transport defects to FTD/ALS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(9):1226–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. Zhang K, Donnelly CJ, Haeusler AR, Grima JC, Machamer JB, Steinwald P, Daley EL, Miller SJ, Cunningham KM, Vidensky S, et al. The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature. 2015;525(7567):56–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. Freibaum BD, Lu Y, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Kim NC, Almeida S, Lee K-H, Badders N, Valentine M, Miller BL, Wong PC, et al. GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature. 2015;525(7567):129–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  204. Coyne AN, Baskerville V, Zaepfel BL, Dickson DW, Rigo F, Bennett F, Lusk CP, Rothstein JD. Nuclear accumulation of CHMP7 initiates nuclear pore complex injury and subsequent TDP-43 dysfunction in sporadic and familial ALS. Sci Transl Med. 2021, 13(604).

  205. Chou C-C, Zhang Y, Umoh ME, Vaughan SW, Lorenzini I, Liu F, Sayegh M, Donlin-Asp PG, Chen YH, Duong DM, et al. TDP-43 pathology disrupts nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport in ALS/FTD. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(2):228–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  206. Giampetruzzi A, Danielson EW, Gumina V, Jeon M, Boopathy S, Brown RH, Ratti A, Landers JE, Fallini C. Modulation of actin polymerization affects nucleocytoplasmic transport in multiple forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. Shang J, Yamashita T, Nakano Y, Morihara R, Li X, Feng T, Liu X, Huang Y, Fukui Y, Hishikawa N, et al. Aberrant distributions of nuclear pore complex proteins in ALS mice and ALS patients. Neuroscience. 2017;350:158–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  208. Trist BG, Hilton JB, Hare DJ, Crouch PJ, Double KL. Superoxide dismutase 1 in Health and Disease: how a Frontline antioxidant becomes neurotoxic. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(17):9215–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  209. Erkkinen MG, Kim MO, Geschwind MD. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the Major Neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018, 10(4).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  210. Twohig D, Nielsen HM. α-synuclein in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  211. Eftekharzadeh B, Daigle JG, Kapinos LE, Coyne A, Schiantarelli J, Carlomagno Y, Cook C, Miller SJ, Dujardin S, Amaral AS, et al. Tau protein disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron. 2018;99(5):925–e940927.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  212. Zhang X, Gao F, Wang D, Li C, Fu Y, He W, Zhang J. Tau Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  213. Leone L, Colussi C, Gironi K, Longo V, Fusco S, Li Puma DD, D’Ascenzo M, Grassi C. Altered Nup153 expression impairs the function of cultured hippocampal neural stem cells isolated from a mouse model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(8):5934–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. Malik SC, Lin JD, Ziegler-Waldkirch S, Tholen S, Deshpande SS, Schwabenland M, Schilling O, Vlachos A, Meyer-Luehmann M, Schachtrup C. Tpr Misregulation in Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells in Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells 2023, 12(23).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  215. Lee BE, Suh P-G, Kim J-I. O-GlcNAcylation in health and neurodegenerative diseases. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53(11):1674–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  216. Grima JC, Daigle JG, Arbez N, Cunningham KC, Zhang K, Ochaba J, Geater C, Morozko E, Stocksdale J, Glatzer JC, et al. Mutant huntingtin disrupts the Nuclear Pore Complex. Neuron. 2017;94(1):93–e107106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  217. Flokas ME, Tomani M, Agdere L, Brown B. Triple A syndrome (Allgrove syndrome): improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach. Pediatr Health Med Ther. 2019;10:99–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  218. Cronshaw JM, Matunis MJ. The nuclear pore complex protein ALADIN is mislocalized in triple A syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(10):5823–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  219. Storr HL, Kind B, Parfitt DA, Chapple JP, Lorenz M, Koehler K, Huebner A, Clark AJ. Deficiency of ferritin heavy-chain nuclear import in triple a syndrome implies nuclear oxidative damage as the primary disease mechanism. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23(12):2086–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. Hirano M, Furiya Y, Asai H, Yasui A, Ueno S. ALADIN I482S causes selective failure of nuclear protein import and hypersensitivity to oxidative stress in triple A syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(7):2298–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  221. Tsai YL, Coady TH, Lu L, Zheng D, Alland I, Tian B, Shneider NA, Manley JL. ALS/FTD-associated protein FUS induces mitochondrial dysfunction by preferentially sequestering respiratory chain complex mRNAs. Genes Dev. 2020;34(11–12):785–805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  222. Teyssou E, Chartier L, Roussel D, Perera ND, Nemazanyy I, Langui D, Albert M, Larmonier T, Saker S, Salachas F et al. The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis M114T PFN1 mutation deregulates alternative Autophagy pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23(10).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  223. Ganjam GK, Bolte K, Matschke LA, Neitemeier S, Dolga AM, Höllerhage M, Höglinger GU, Adamczyk A, Decher N, Oertel WH, et al. Mitochondrial damage by α-synuclein causes cell death in human dopaminergic neurons. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(11):865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  224. Delcambre S, Ghelfi J, Ouzren N, Grandmougin L, Delbrouck C, Seibler P, Wasner K, Aasly JO, Klein C, Trinh J et al. Mitochondrial mechanisms of LRRK2 G2019S Penetrance. Front Neurol 2020, 11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work in part was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 ES027245, R01 ES034196, R01 NS121692, and R01 NS124226. Other sources include Johnny Isakson Endowment to AGK, the Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar and the Coach Mark Richt Neurological Disease Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZR and GSR contributed to the writing and generating figures/tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anumantha G. Kanthasamy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AGK has an equity interest in PK Biosciences Corporation and Probiome Therapeutics located in Ames, Iowa. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Iowa State University and the University of Georgia in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies. Other authors declare no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riaz, Z., Richardson, G., Jin, H. et al. Nuclear pore and nucleocytoplasmic transport impairment in oxidative stress-induced neurodegeneration: relevance to molecular mechanisms in Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s and other related neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurodegeneration 19, 87 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13024-024-00774-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13024-024-00774-0

Keywords