Skip to main content

Lipidome disruption in Alzheimer’s disease brain: detection, pathological mechanisms, and therapeutic implications

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is among the most devastating neurodegenerative disorders with limited treatment options. Emerging evidence points to the involvement of lipid dysregulation in the development of AD. Nevertheless, the precise lipidomic landscape and the mechanistic roles of lipids in disease pathology remain poorly understood. This review aims to highlight the significance of lipidomics and lipid-targeting approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of AD. We summarized the connection between lipid dysregulation in the human brain and AD at both genetic and lipid species levels. We briefly introduced lipidomics technologies and discussed potential challenges and areas of future advancements in the lipidomics field for AD research. To elucidate the central role of lipids in converging multiple pathological aspects of AD, we reviewed the current knowledge on the interplay between lipids and major AD features, including amyloid beta, tau, and neuroinflammation. Finally, we assessed the progresses and obstacles in lipid-based therapeutics and proposed potential strategies for leveraging lipidomics in the treatment of AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease and current challenges

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder marked by progressive cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavioral changes [1]. It is the most common cause of dementia [2] and was the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 [3]. Currently, around 6.9 million Americans aged 65 and older are living with Alzheimer’s dementia, and this number is expected to rise to 82 million by 2050 [4]. As one of the most expensive conditions for the society, AD incurs significant healthcare and long-term care costs, estimated at $360 billion in 2024 [4].

AD can be categorized into two types: early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). FAD is rare (approximately 5% of AD cases) with typical disease onset at 65 years or younger, usually caused by gene variants of amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin (PSEN1) and PSEN2. LOAD is more common (~ 95% of AD cases) with disease onset older than 65 years and is associated with a combination of genetic (such as apolipoprotein E ε4 allele), environmental, and lifestyle factors [5]. FAD and LOAD exert pathological and clinical similarities, characterized by the presence of extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) [6]. In addition to these pathological hallmarks, multiple alterations converge in the pathogenesis of AD. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers in AD patients indicate that neuroinflammation plays a significant role in disease pathogenesis [7]. Additionally, mitochondrial defects have been implicated in the exhaustion of nerve cells [8]. The disease is further characterized by disrupted production of trophic factors, neurotransmitters, and neuromodulators [9], as well as impaired degradation pathways, including endolysosomal anomalies [10, 11], autophagy defects [12], and dysfunction of the ubiquitin-proteasome system [13]. Previous AD treatments primarily focus on temporarily improving cognitive function and managing behavioral symptoms. Recent progresses of Aβ antibody-based therapies [14,15,16] have shifted the focus toward disease-modifying approaches, offering new hope for altering the course of the disease. To further advance this paradigm, identifying additional disease-driving factors and understanding the molecular mechanisms involved are essential for developing new disease-modifying therapies to prevent or reverse neurodegeneration.

Function of lipids in the brain

Lipids are key biological molecules that mediate cellular and organismal processes. It’s been widely recognized that lipids are multi-functional. For instance, they serve as essential structural components of cellular membranes, creating a selective barrier that separates the cell from its surroundings and ensures the compartmentalization within the cell [17]. Lipids are also crucial in energy metabolism, providing the cell with necessary fuel [18]. Moreover, they actively participate in signal transduction, either by functioning directly as signaling molecules or indirectly by influencing membrane fluidity, enabling post-translational modifications, or facilitating allosteric modulations [19]. It is estimated that there are at least 100,000 distinct lipid species in the human lipidome [20], which suggests greater diversity than proteins. Lipid species can vary in terms of their molecular weight, head group composition, the number and nature of carbon–carbon bonds, as well as the overall structure. In 2005, the LIPID Metabolites and Pathways Strategy (LIPID MAPS) Consortium classified lipids into eight categories based on their chemical features and the distinct hydrophobic and hydrophilic elements [21]. These include fatty acyls, glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, sterol lipids, prenol lipids, and saccharolipids. Within each category, lipid molecular species are further subdivided into classes according to their polar head groups [21,22,23].

The mammalian brain is highly enriched in lipids and is most diversified in terms of lipid classes and lipid molecular species. Over 50% of brain dry weight is composed of lipids, which is only second to that of adipose tissue [24]. Early study has uncovered that brain lipids consist of approximately 50% phospholipids, about 40% glycolipids, 10% cholesterol and cholesterol esters, with traces of triglycerides [25]. This composition is considered crucial for synapse formation and maintaining the structure and function of neural membranes. Notably, among different parts of the brain, myelin-enriched white mater has a much higher lipid content (78–81% of the dry weight) than average. The high lipid content in the myelin ensures necessary intermolecular force for myelin-axonal membrane anchoring and forms lipid raft platforms for myelin proteins to engage in various cellular- and inter-cellular- processes. This is consistent with its function in providing support for the generation and maintenance of myelin sheath [26, 27].

In addition to high lipid content, the brain also has the largest diversity of lipid classes and lipid molecular species compared to other organs [28]. For example, fatty acid composition of the brain is distinctive, featuring a high concentration of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs), and is particularly abundant in arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) [29]. Additionally, the existence of a large amount of diverse glycosphingolipids such as sulfatide and gangliosides in the brain is very unique [30, 31]. A recent survey of human brain lipidome emphasized variations of lipid composition between brain regions, which is coordinated with brain’s structural characteristics (such as myelin content and cell type composition) and functional traits (functional connectivity and information processing hierarchy) [32]. The wide diversity of brain lipids suggests complex and specific physiological roles, many of which are still poorly understood. These characteristics highlight the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the brain lipidome and its regulation, which is essential not only for advancing our knowledge of brain physiology but also for identifying biomarkers and developing future therapeutics for neurological diseases.

Lipid-related risk genes in AD

In addition to senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, a third pathological hallmark in AD brain tissue, “adipose inclusions” or “lipoid granules”, was described in Dr. Alois Alzheimer’s original report of AD in 1907 [33], this early suggestion of aberrant lipid metabolism has largely remained understudied over the past century, partially due to limited techniques for pursuing this direction, as well as the intensive focus on other disease hypotheses (such as Aβ and tau). A large body of emerging data including the recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [34, 35], clinical trials, and epidemiological studies on AD has provided strong support for the implication of perturbed brain lipid metabolism in the pathogenesis of AD [36,37,38]. In addition to genes that underlie the autosomal dominant, early onset forms of AD: APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2 [39,40,41,42], the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) has been identified as the main susceptibility factor for LOAD [43]. ApoE plays a critical role in regulating the transport, delivery, and clearance of cholesterol, phospholipids and many other lipids in the brain. It facilitates lipid efflux from cells. Studies have shown that among the ApoE isoforms, ApoE2 is the most efficient in mediating lipid efflux from cells, the ApoE4 isoform is the least efficient in this process due to its poorer lipidation [44, 45]. In addition to APOE, recent GWAS have provided further insights into the genetic etiology of AD, reporting the identification of over 75 risk loci, among which a large number of genes are involved in lipid-related physiological/pathophysiological processes [34, 46, 47]. The lipid-related functional involvement of these AD risk genes is summarized in Table 1. For example, lipid transport-related genes such as TREM2 [48], SORL1 [49], ABCA1 [50], and ABCA7 [51, 52] regulate the sensing, uptake, and efflux of lipids, respectively. Lipid synthesis and breakdown can be modulated by PRKD3 [53] and KLF16 [54] through enhancing SREBP1 activity, or inducing the PPARα-related lipid catabolism pathway, respectively. Conversion of phospholipids by INPP5D and PLCG2 is known to play critical roles in intracellular signaling [55,56,57,58]. Further, multiple AD risk genes participate in lipid metabolism through various mechanisms, such as facilitating the function of lipid uptake receptors (ADAM17 [59], HS3ST5 [60, 61]), impacting lipogenesis via adjusting substrate availability (BCKDK [62]), and altering lipogenesis signaling pathways (FERMT2 [63], ADAMTS1 [64]). Overall, these observations suggest that disruption of lipid metabolism is not only a prominent feature, but may also function as a major disease driving factor in AD.

Table 1 Summary of lipid-related AD-risk genes

AD-associated lipid alterations in the human brain detected by lipidomics

Application and challenges of lipidomics in AD

The term “lipidomics” was first coined in the scientific literature by Han and Gross in early 2000s [103]. During the past few years, the development of lipidomics has significantly deepened our understanding of the brain lipid composition, homeostasis, and function. By leveraging advanced analytical techniques, lipidomics allows for the detection of diverse brain lipid species in an unprecedented resolution as well as spatial distribution, revealing intricate details that are crucial for comprehending neurological conditions. Meanwhile, it is also important to recognize the current challenges of lipidomic studies in AD. The vast complexity and diversity of the lipidome brings technical challenges for its accurate detection (e.g., ion suppression, incomplete extraction, and difficulties ionizing diverse lipids). Besides, biological variability among AD patients complicates data interpretation, as individual differences in lipid metabolism can obscure disease-specific lipid signatures. Additionally, integrating lipidomics with other omics data for a comprehensive understanding of AD requires sophisticated computational tools and expertise. Thus, continuous innovations in technology and methodology to improve accuracy and integration of lipidomics in AD research are critical for advancing our understanding of disease mechanisms, identifying robust biomarkers, and developing targeted therapeutic strategies. A summary on the workflow of mass spectrometry-based lipidomics and brief description of methods is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The brief workflow of mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. Yellow boxes illustrate the representative lipid extraction methods currently been widely used [104]. The Folch method [105] is ideal for large samples (> 0.1 g of tissue), while B&D [106] is more appropriate for smaller samples (< 50 mg) [104, 107]. MTBE method [108] improves workflow automation by separating lipids into an upper organic phase, but it risks aqueous-phase contamination. BUME method [109] reduces contamination with a butanol/methanol mixture but complicates lipid collection due to the volatility of butanol. Green boxes illustrate the major lipidomic methodologies. Direct infusion-MS, also known as shotgun lipidomics [110], uses direct infusion of lipid extracts into a mass spectrometer without pre-separation. This technique minimizes lipid aggregation and is highly accurate for quantification. Chromatography-MS acquires a pre-separation of lipids before being introduced into a mass spectrometer. This includes NPLC, normal phase liquid chromatography, ideal for separating polar lipids [111]; RPLC, reversed phase liquid chromatography, resolves lipid species based on the hydrophobicity of lipids [112]; HILIC, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, bridges the gap for polar lipids that RPLC struggles to retain [113]. MS imaging, mass spectrometry imaging, allows the visualization of lipid molecules directly in tissue sections without extraction or labeling, enabling insight into lipid localization in disease-affected areas. Purple boxes illustrate the techniques used during data acquisition. Ionization methods are listed in box (a) ESI [114], electrospray ionization, creates ions by applying high voltage to a liquid to form an aerosol. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) [115] are ideal for ionizing less polar molecules. MALDI [116], often paired with time-of-flight (TOF) MS, provides spatial information on lipid location. DESI [117] allows real-time imaging with minimal sample preparation, while SIMS [118] offers detailed surface analysis ideal for studying lipid membrane [119]. Mass spectrometry approaches are listed in box (b) Tandem MS [120], uses mass selection (MS1) to identify molecular mass and applies a second round of MS (MS2) to deduce lipid structures. High mass accuracy MS [121] provides precise identification of lipids based on accurate mass. Multidimensional MS (MDMS) selectively ionizes lipid categories using different ionization conditions and matrix modifiers (e.g., intrasource separation [122])

Sphingolipids

Sphingolipids are highly concentrated in the nervous system, where they play a crucial role in forming membranes and myelin sheath [123]. In synaptic membranes, sphingolipids regulate the activity of neurotransmitter receptors [124]. In lipid rafts, sphingolipids regulate the activity of transmembrane proteins together with cholesterol [125]. Sphingolipids can also act as lipid second messengers to regulate stress resistance, proliferation, differentiation and survival of cells in the nervous system [126, 127].

Sphingolipids are composed of a sphingosine backbone, an amide-linked long-chain fatty acid, and a head group that defines different classes. For example, ceramides contain a hydroxyl head group, sphingomyelin contains phosphocholine, glycosphingolipids contain carbohydrates, and gangliosides contain one or more sialic acid residues in their carbohydrate head groups [123].

The metabolism of sphingolipids is tightly regulated by multiple enzymes through two major pathways (Fig. 2): (1) De novo synthesis, which begins with the condensation of serine and palmitoyl-CoA in the endoplasmic reticulum, and ends with the formation of ceramide, which is further transported to Golgi to act as a precursor for the production of other sphingolipids; and (2) Salvage pathway, in which complex sphingolipids such as sphingomyelin, gangliosides, cerebrosides, and sulfatides are degraded to form ceramides. These ceramides can then be further broken down into sphingosine, which can either be recycled back into ceramide or exit the pathway through hydrolysis [128]. Growing evidence suggests that alterations in sphingolipid metabolism play a key role in the pathogenesis of AD.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic illustration of sphingolipid metabolism. This figure summarizes the conversion relationship between ceramide and other major sphingolipids with respective enzymes involved. Abbreviations: SPT, serine palmitoyl transferase; 3-KSR, 3-keto-sphinganine reductase; CerS, ceramide synthases; DES1, dihydroceramide desaturase; SMase, sphingomyelinase; SMS, sphingomyelin synthase; GALC, β-galactosylceramidase; CGT, ceramide galactosyltransferase; ARSA, arylsulfatase A; CST, cerebroside sulfotransferase; C1PP, ceramide-1-phosphate phosphatase; CERK, ceramide kinase; GCase, glucocerebrosidase; UGCG, ceramide glucosyltransferase; SphK1/2, sphingosine kinase 1/2; and SGPP, sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase

Ceramide and related sphingolipids

As the precursor of all complex sphingolipids, ceramide plays a central role in sphingolipid metabolism and homeostasis (Fig. 2), an imbalance in ceramide metabolism could have severe implications in diseases. In the brain, C16 and C18 ceramides are mainly present in neurons, while very long chain ceramides such as C24-containing ones are highly enriched in myelin [129, 130]. Elevated ceramides in post-mortem human AD brain have been observed by multiple studies [131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138], which is believed to be partially contributed by enhanced activity of sphingomyelinase (SMase), the enzyme that mediates the conversion of sphingomyelin (SM) to ceramide [134]. It has also been reported that de novo synthesis of ceramide is enhanced in early-stage AD, leading to elevation of C22:0 and C24:0 species [139].

Serving as one of the major sources in the Salvage pathway, sphingomyelin can also be synthesized by sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) using ceramide as a substrate. Highly enriched in lipid rafts and myelin sheets, SM species contribute to signal transduction, as well as the regulation of inflammatory processes and responses to oxidative stress [59]. Lipidomics evaluations of SM levels in AD brain have generated variable observations, possibly due to differences among brain regions and disease stages of patient cohorts [132, 136,137,138, 140]. A recent multi-omics study demonstrated global dysregulation of the SM pathway in AD brain, and further identified plasma SM (d34:1)/SM (d43:1) ratio as a strong indicator for sphingolipid dysregulation in AD [141]. This suggests that the dynamic alterations of SM can be utilized to develop disease markers and potential therapeutic targets for AD interventions.

A few additional important bioactive metabolites of ceramide also have been shown altered in AD, which could contribute to the disease via various mechanisms. These include sphingosine, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), and ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P). Increased sphingosine has been observed in AD brain [132, 142], which is accompanied by elevated levels and activity of ceramidase [143] and down-regulation of ceramide synthases (CerS) [129]. Sphingosine can be further phosphorylated by SphK1 and 2, producing S1P, a molecule considered to be neuroprotective by acting through G protein-coupled receptors in the plasma membrane [144]. Notably, reduced SphK activity and loss of S1P have been found in early AD pathogenesis [132, 145], which may function to accelerate neuronal damage. The catalysis of ceramide by ceramide kinase (CERK) produces C1P, which is known to regulate cell growth and migration, as well as play roles in inflammation [146]. Elevated levels of C1P have been observed in AD brains [147].

Another group of related lipids is glycosphingolipids, which are glycolipids containing either a sphingoid or a ceramide as their hydrophobic moiety. Among which, members of cerebrosides, and gangliosides are highly enriched in the brain, particularly in myelin. Cerebrosides are composed of a ceramide and a monosaccharide, usually glucose or galactose. Galactocerebroside, also known as galactosylceramide (GalCer), is an intermediate molecule for the synthesis of sulfatide (which will be further discussed in the next section). Levels of cerebrosides have been found to be stable or decreased in AD [131, 148], while certain species, such as 2OH- containing GalCer have been found elevated in AD hippocampus [149]. Gangliosides are glycosphingolipids containing one or more sialic acid residue(s) in their carbohydrate moiety [150]. They are known to impact aggregation of Aβ [151] and are often found dysregulated in AD brain [148, 152, 153].

Sulfatide

Sulfatides (ST) is a class of glycosphingolipids predominantly found in myelin sheath of the nervous system. It plays a vital role in maintaining the stability and functionality of myelin, which is essential for the proper conduction of nerve impulses [154]. Structurally, sulfatide comprises a sphingosine backbone, a fatty acid chain that may or may not have a hydroxy group in the α-position, and a polar head group containing a sulfate (SO4) moiety [155, 156]. The synthesis of ST initiates in the Golgi apparatus where galactose is transferred onto ceramide by galactosyltransferase (CGT), forming GalCer, the intermediate molecule. GalCer further reacts with phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS) to produce ST, which is mediated by the enzyme cerebroside sulfotransferase (CST, encoded by Gal3st1 gene). Degradation of ST can be mediated by arylsulfatase A (ARSA) and its cofactor saposin B in the lysosome, resulting in the production of GalCer [157].

Levels of ST increase during development and maturation stage and decline in the aged brain [158, 159]. Alteration of ST in AD brain has been well documented. Using shotgun lipidomics, Han et al. reported substantial loss of ST in the early stages of AD human brain [131, 160, 161]. This observation has been further confirmed by other groups using different methods, including MALDI-MSI [162], HPLC [163], and HPTLC [148]. Among different subclasses of ST, one study reported that non-hydroxylated fatty acid-containing sulfatides are more abundant in the white matter, while sulfatides with hydroxylated fatty acids have been found to predominantly localize in the grey matter [164]. The reduction of the major non-hydroxylated specie N24:1 has been detected in the disease brain, which is in concordance with the established white matter damage in AD [165,166,167]. Several hydroxylated ST species, including 24:0 (OH)- and 26:0 (OH)-containing sulfatides, have been reported to be up- or down-regulated in a brain region-dependent manner [164]. Notably, the ratio of hydroxylated to non-hydroxylated fatty acids in ST is known to vary with age [168, 169] and AD [170] in mammals.

The metabolism of sulfatide has strong bi-directional interaction with risk factors of AD [163, 171]. Sulfatides were found associated ApoE-containing HDL-like lipoproteins in the cerebrospinal fluid [172]. Knockout and transgenic modifications of APOE in mice led to elevated and decreased sulfatide levels, respectively [172, 173]. Moreover, brain levels of sulfatides are significantly influenced by APOE isoforms with APOE4 mice having the lowest, while APOE2 mice having the highest sulfatide levels [174]. These observations suggest ApoE may function as a sulfatide transporter. Further, they indicate ApoE may mediate sulfatide dysregulation in AD. Conversely, loss of sulfatide stimulates brain ApoE levels [175], which may indicate a compensatory effect to enhance transportation under sulfatide insufficiency; or else, an in-direct stress response of other glia to cope with the disrupted lipid homeostasis.

The indispensable role of sulfatide on maintaining myelin integrity has been thoroughly documented in vivo. Knockout of CGT in mice, which ablates both GalCer and sulfatide, led to progressive hindlimb paralysis and extensive vacuolation in the ventral region of the spinal cord [176]; while deletion of CST, which targets the production of sulfatides, resulted in hindlimb weakness followed with pronounced tremor and progressive ataxia [177]. Consistently, biochemical and microscopic evaluations revealed disrupted myelin structure as well as loss of major myelin proteins upon loss of sulfatides [178]. Notably, hydroxylated sulfatide species also play critical roles in myelin-related function. Knockout of fatty acid 2-hydrocylase (FA2H), the enzyme responsible for producing hydroxylated sulfatides, led to significant demyelination, profound axonal loss, and abnormally enlarged axons coupled with deficits in spatial learning and memory [179].

Multiple lines of evidence have pointed out the critical disease-driving effect of sulfatide depletion on AD pathogenesis. This theory is further supported by recent studies that examined the effects of modulating sulfatide levels in mice. Specifically, a mouse model with inducible CST gene deletion specifically in oligodendrocytes has achieved about 50% reduction of sulfatides in the brain, which is comparable to the pattern of sulfatide loss seen in human AD brains [175, 180]. These conditional CST deletion mice exhibited impaired cognitive function and a substantial induction of AD-like neuroinflammation [175]. In addition to neurobiological changes, structural alterations such as cortical atrophy and ventricular enlargement are known to be correlated with cognitive decline [181, 182]. To this end, significant enlargement of ventricular compartment has also been observed in mice with sulfatide loss [183], further supporting the notion that sulfatide deficiency may be a driver in the development of behavioral, neurological, and cerebral structural characteristics in AD.

While studies of AD mostly focus on pathological features of the central nervous system (CNS), it is worth mentioning that disturbance of peripheral organ function often accompany disease progression [184], yet the mechanism and causal factors largely remain unknown. Interestingly, a significant enlargement of urinary bladder phenotype has been observed in aged oligodendrocyte-specific sulfatide-deficient mice [185], which was thought to result from the disrupted lipidome and gene expression in the spinal cord. It is widely recognized that the loss of bowel and bladder control is a common symptom among mid- to late-stage AD patients [186], thus these observations suggest that sulfatides are critical for maintaining spinal cord function and supporting associated peripheral physiologies. Another long-standing area of research in the field is the relationship between obesity and dementia [187]. Extensive evidence supports the correlation and contribution of metabolic disorder to the development of AD [188,189,190], while brain dysfunction is also well-known regulator of changes in peripheral energy homeostasis [191, 192]. A recent study in the adult-onset CNS sulfatide deficiency mouse model has shown sex-dependent metabolic dysregulation upon sulfatide loss, potentially due to disrupted hypothalamic control of food intake [193]. This suggests that loss of sulfatide may be a link between cognitive decline and peripheral metabolic disorders.

Cholesterol

Although the brain comprises only 2% of the body’s weight, it contains 25% of the body’s total cholesterol [28]. As an important membrane component, cholesterol is vital for neuron and glial functions. In neurons, cholesterol supports neurotransmitter release at presynapses [194], and influences synaptic activity by altering receptor dynamics at postsynapses [195]. In microglia, cholesterol is necessary to promote survival and phagocytic capacity [196]. In oligodendrocytes, cholesterol supports myelin growth, axon wrapping [197], and facilitates signal transduction [198]. Besides, cholesterol also serves as precursor of neuroactive steroids and oxysterols [199, 200].

Brain cholesterol is isolated from the systemic circulation [201]. Studies have emphasized that disturbance in brain cholesterol homeostasis plays a crucial role in the progression of AD [202, 203]. It has been reported that the disease risk isoform APOE ε4 contributes to AD partially due to its impaired ability to carry cholesterol, resulting in disrupted cholesterol metabolism [195]. Further, alterations in cholesterol-related enzymes, transporters, and receptors have been observed in postmortem brains of AD patients [204, 205]. Levels of HMG-CoA reductase, the key enzyme mediating the production of many sterols, are positively correlated with AD-related cognitive impairment [206, 207]. Concordantly, multiple studies have identified altered levels cholesterol/cholesterol esters (CE) in AD brain tissues [136,137,138] (Table 2). Discussions on the involvement of cholesterol in AD progression and related mechanisms, as well as therapeutic implications have been provided by several pervious and recent reviews [202, 203, 208, 209].

Phospholipids

Glycerophospholipids, the primary lipid group in cell membranes, are composed of a glycerol backbone connected to a polar head group and largely containing two fatty acid chains. These lipids contribute to cell membrane stability, fluidity, and permeability [123]. Glycerophospholipids can be classified into several classes based on their head groups: phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and phosphatidic acid (PA). Changes in various types of phospholipids and their derivatives have been reported in previous studies on the brains of individuals with AD [203, 210]. Additionally, receptor-mediated breakdown of glycerophospholipids by phospholipases A, C, and D, which generate several second messengers, including diacylglycerol (DAG), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, lysoglycerophospholipids, and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, is dysregulated in AD [211]. Some of these degradation products are proinflammatory, stimulating the release of cytokines through activating astrocytes and microglia, which further exacerbate oxidative stress and neuroinflammation through various mechanisms including the up-regulation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) isoforms, cyclooxygenase (COX), and nitric oxide synthases (NOS) [211,212,213].

Plasmalogen is a subclass of glycerophospholipids that possesses a vinyl ether-connected aliphatic substituent at sn-1 of the glycerol backbone. Abundantly present in the brain, plasmalogens are known to be protective against oxidative stress [214]. Deficit of plasmalogens has been well-documented in human sporadic AD tissues [131, 215, 216] (decline of 15 ~ 40% depending on brain region) [140], and its content is negatively associated with Braak staging [217]. Administration of plasmalogen precursors has been shown to attenuate neuroinflammation and protects cognition [218]. Findings from another study have associated the protective effect of plasmalogen with the pSTAT3/PIM/NFATc1 pathway [219]. Recently, a novel plasmalogen deficiency mouse model has been established through tamoxifen-inducible Gnpat gene deletion. This model is designed to mimic plasmalogen deficiency in neurodegeneration and shows altered behavior and nerve function at a young adult age [220].

Lysophospholipids are metabolites transiently generated during the remodeling of glycerophospholipids [211]. For instance, lysophospholipids can be generated by the activation of phospholipases A2 [221] and increases in oxidative stress [222]. At high concentrations, lysophospholipids can cause cellular damage by altering membrane permeability, and disturbing osmotic equilibrium [223]. Studies have characterized the changes of lysophospholipids in AD with varied findings [224,225,226,227] (Table 2). A recent study using DESI-based MS imaging has captured the co-accumulation of lysophospholipids with Aβ aggregates in AD brain [135]. This finding suggests a potential direct interaction between lysophospholipids and Aβ, as well as their involvement in microglial activation via lipid-sensing surface receptors. Indeed, modulating the activity of lysophospholipid-sensing G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been proposed as a novel intervention for neuropathological diseases [228]. Additionally, specific form of lysophospholipid such as DHA containing-LPC has been considered as a tool for brain DHA enrichment due to its role as a preferential DHA carrier in the brain [229].

Lipid droplets

Lipid droplets (LDs) are intracellular organelles containing neutral lipids such as glycerolipids (triacylglycerols (TAG), diacylglycerols (DAG), monoacylglycerols (MAG)) and cholesterol esters (CE), surrounded by a monolayer of phospholipids and LD-associated proteins. Accumulation of brain LDs has been reported in both aging and AD [36, 230]. Particularly, the accumulation of LD in microglia has been found to be associated with APOE4/4 isoform [36]. In vitro cell culture studies have suggested that microglial LD formation can be stimulated by fibrillar Aβ; and conditioned culture media from LD-containing microglia enhances tau phosphorylation [36]. Another recent study reported the presence of neuronal LD in tauopathy and its impact on microglial lipid homeostasis though AMPK [231]. The formation of LD has been reported to be a consequence of cellular stress, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and altered energy metabolism [232, 233]. Although it is believed that LD can play a protective role by sequestering toxic lipids and providing energy support [234], excessive LD accumulation has been associated with neurodegeneration by promoting neuroinflammation, cellular metabolic disruption, and synaptic disfunction [230, 235,236,237].

Table 2 Summary of major lipid changes in human AD brain

The interplay between lipid metabolism and other AD features

Lipid dysregulation and Aβ

Prior to being termed “amyloid”, the amyloid deposits in the brain were initially described as “lardaceous” and “waxy” in the 18th and 19th centuries [240]. Later, the presence of lipids in amyloid deposits has been demonstrated by multiple groups [241,242,243]. Lipid content ranges from 1 to 16% by dry weight in preparations of amyloid fibrils of different sources [241]. The majority of plaque-associated lipids are cholesterol, sphingomyelin, sulfatides, and to a less extent, cholesterol esters and fatty acids [243]. Advancement of lipidomics has allowed more detailed characterization of lipid species around plaques. For example, increased lysophospholipids and ceramides have been found around Aβ plaques in human AD brain; consistently, age-dependent increases in lysophospholipids and bis(monoacylglycero)phosphates (BMP) have been observed around Aβ plaques in AppNL−G−F mice [135]. These observations have been accompanied by a rise of research interests focusing on the understanding of the reciprocal regulations between lipids and Aβ metabolism.

Aβ peptides are generated by proteolytic processing of the APP by the sequential action of β- and γ- secretases. They are mainly 40 or 42 amino acids in length, and are known to be hydrophobic molecules [244]. Alternatively, APP can be cleaved by α-secretase, which does not generate plaque-forming Aβ peptides (the “non-amyloidogenic” pathway). Upon production, Aβ42 peptides are prone to change its secondary structure from random coil to β-sheet rich, highly ordered states, which are cytotoxic [245]. β-Sheets can further aggregate into oligomers, protofibrils, and mature fibrils with distinct morphologies [246]. Notably, studies have suggested that small Aβ oligomers are the most toxic form of Aβ peptides, which are believed to directly involve in neuronal loss [247]. A large body of evidence supports the notion that accumulation of Aβ in the brain plays a critical role in AD (the “Amyloid Hypothesis”) [248]. Although mechanisms that regulate Aβ metabolism remain under investigation, lipids appear to be involved in multiple aspects of this process (Fig. 3).

The trafficking of APP through the endosomal system has been found to be regulated by phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI(3)P), which acts by recruiting its binding effectors that control budding, fusion, and sorting functions of the endosomal system [239]. As a lipid species known to decrease in AD brains, down-regulating PI(3)P in mice resulted in enhanced Aβ generation [239]. It has also been shown that the composition of membrane can regulate APP enzymatic processing. Decreases in membrane unsaturated fatty acyls or increases in saturated fatty acyls or cholesterol are generally considered to favor Aβ production [249]. Particularly, while α-cleavage occurs at the cell surface, both β- and γ- secretases are compartmentalized and process APP preferentially in lipid rafts [250], which are membrane domains enriched with cholesterol, sphingolipids, and gangliosides [251]. Within these domains, cholesterol has been found to complex with and stimulate the activity of β- and γ-secretases [252, 253]. Additionally, a cholesterol derivative, 27-hydroxycholesterol has been found to trigger the phosphorylation and degradation of IκB, leading to the transcriptional up-regulation of β-secretase [254]. Conversely, lowering cholesterol with statin has been found to inhibit β- and γ-secretases activities due to enhanced membrane fluidity and reduced APP accessibility [255]. The lipid composition of lipid rafts changes with age. For example, brain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) decrease with age. This change is further exacerbated in AD [249]. Studies have shown that omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., DHA) are decreased in AD post-mortem brains. This change not only disrupts synaptic plasticity through altering membrane fluidity, but is also known to induce both β- and γ-secretases activities via direct and indirect manners (e.g., by excluding cholesterol from lipid rafts) [256].

A significant number of studies have further demonstrated the impact of major lipid alterations on the processing of APP. Abundantly present in lipid rafts and myelin sheath, sphingolipids are heavily involved in APP processing. Increased membrane ceramides embedded in lipid rafts enhance the production of Aβ by facilitating the low-affinity p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR)-mediated APP β-cleavage [257]. Ceramide also functions as a γ-secretase modulator that increases Aβ 42 production [258]. These activities further enforce the vicious cycle of disease progression as elevated Aβ stimulates SMase activity, which hydrolyzes sphingomyelin to produce more ceramide [138, 259]. Gangliosides, which are found to co-assemble with Aβ monomers and Aβ fibrils, are believed to facilitate β-sheet formation of Aβ. It has been reported that the ganglioside-Aβ complex serves as a template for binding and conformation transition of additional Aβ molecules, functioning as initiation and seeding platform [260]. However, a recent study showed a delayed Aβ40 aggregation with increasing monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) concentration in a non-seeded kinetics experimental setting [261]. Further, GM1 also has the ability to inhibit Aβ oligomerization induced by sphingomyelin [262], thus the effects of gangliosides on Aβ aggregation could be context dependent.

The metabolism and aggregation of Aβ peptides are also regulated by lipids. Extracellular vesicles such as exosomes are membrane structures enriched in cholesterol, sphingomyelin, ceramide, and phospholipids with some variation based on the origin [263, 264]. Exosomal proteins are present in plaques, and the release of Aβ from cells has been found to be associated with exosomes [265]. Although exosomes may play protective role in AD due to their inclusion of Aβ degradation enzymes such as neprilysin and insulin-degrading enzymes [266, 267], recent study has revealed that cellular derived exosomes accelerate Aβ fibril formation, and this effect is partially contributed by anionic phospholipids-induced primary nucleation of Aβ peptides [268]. Thus, exosomal lipidome and their alterations in disease condition may alter disease progression through impacting Aβ pathology.

An important member of sphingolipid that plays critical role in Aβ metabolism is sulfatide. The role of ST in Aβ clearance was documented in our previous study. It plays an essential role in ApoE-facilitated clearance of extracellular Aβ peptides [269]. Adding sulfatide into H4-APPwt cell culture media selectively reduced Aβ42 levels in the media and increased Aβ peptide content in the lysosome- and endosome-enriched cellular fractions [269]. Using a chemically defined vesicular model system, Zeng et al. further demonstrated that sulfatide significantly enhances the binding of Aβ peptides to ApoE-associated vesicles [269]. Additionally, multiple lines of evidence support that ST may also participate in Aβ production processes. A recent study indicated ST decreases Aβ generation by down-regulating β-secretase and γ-secretase activities in cell culture models [163]. Conversely, a byproduct of Aβ production, the APP intracellular domain (AICD), can decrease the expression of the ST synthesis enzyme CST, thus reducing ST levels [163]. These findings establish a strong link between ApoE, Aβ, and ST, providing evidence for a better understanding of lipid-related mechanisms in AD and for developing potential therapeutic interventions.

In addition to disrupting lipid homeostasis, the interactions between Aβ and lipids are also critical for its toxicity. Upon production, Aβ localizes in both cytoplasm and extracellular environment, where it interacts with lipids in cellular membranes and their associated proteins to exert its toxic effects. Particularly, interactions of Aβ with cholesterol, gangliosides, and phospholipids in membrane microdomains initiate Aβ fibril formation. These interactions can disrupt membrane integrity by forming pore-like channels and affecting signaling, leading to changes in calcium homeostasis [270, 271]. Notably, synaptic membranes are particularly susceptible due to their high affinity for Aβ oligomers. Based on this, these interactions have been suggested to play an essential role in synaptic dysfunction and contribute to the cognitive decline observed in AD [272]. Studies have indicated multiple other mechanisms of Aβ toxicity through its association with lipids. Aβ peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress has been considered to promote lipid peroxidation [273], leading to direct membrane damages. This process also produces various secondary products via the fission and endo-cyclization of the oxygenated fatty acids, which possess neurotoxic activity [274]. Aβ accumulation can also activate microglia and astrocytes, leading to a chronic inflammatory response in the brain, which indirectly exacerbate neuronal damage [275].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mechanisms of lipid involvement in Aβ metabolism. Summary of the regulatory roles of lipids in multiple stages of Aβ metabolism. (1) Lipid component in cellular organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus, and endosome can regulate the intracellular trafficking and enzymatic processing of APP. Elevated sulfatides, PUFAs and PI(3)P (green font) are considered to lower Aβ generation, while induction of cholesterol and ceramides (red font) promotes Aβ production. (2) Lipids can also impact Aβ levels by transcriptional regulation of APP secretases (e.g., 27-hydorxycholetserol promotes β- secretase expression). (3) Interaction of cholesterol, gangliosides, and phospholipids with Aβ induces Aβ fibrillation. (4) Sulfatides facilitate ApoE-mediated Aβ uptake. (5) Exosome-mediated Aβ secretion can impact Aβ load by enzymatic degradation or facilitating nucleation via Aβ-phospholipid interaction

Lipid dysregulation and tau

Tau is a cytoplasmic protein that interacts with and stabilizes microtubules to ensure proper cytoskeletal organization and trafficking [276]. Encoded by the MAPT gene, tau is alternatively spliced into six different isoforms, containing domains including N-terminal (negatively charged), proline-rich, repeat domain (RD) (positively charged), and C-terminal. Although being naturally hydrophilic and maintains an unfolded structure, tau undergoes abnormal misfolding and aggregation under pathological conditions, impairing its functions.

A large body of evidence has demonstrated the association of tau with lipids in AD. The localization of paired helical filament (PHF) tau in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane has been recorded using electron micrographs [277]. Glycolipids are often found associated with PHFs obtained from AD post-mortem neuronal tissues [278]. Combining HPLC and MALDI-TOF-MS analysis, lipids including phosphatidylcholine, galactocerebrosides, sphingomyelin, and cholesterol have been detected in AD PHFs [279]. Studies also identified the presence of tau in lipid rafts membrane and microdomains [280, 281] with enriched phosphorylation over time [282]. In vitro, the interactions between various tau constructs and negatively charged lipids have been detected by fluorescence spectroscopy, microscopy and other biophysical methods [283,284,285,286].

Fundamentally, lipids can modulate tau pathophysiology in several ways. Firstly, the negatively-charged lipid membrane surface favors electrostatic interactions with cationic residues in tau, promoting its aggregation. Secondly, altered lipid metabolism can regulate tau phosphorylation through impacting kinase activity. Thirdly, interaction of tau with lipid-enriched membranes mediates the secretion and cytotoxicity of tau [287] (Fig. 4).

The affinity of tau for lipids highly depends on electrostatic interactions. Studies have demonstrated that cationic residues in tau promote electrostatic interactions with negatively charged membrane surfaces [287]. Importantly, these interactions often lead to conformational changes that facilitate aggregation. For example, binding to membranes containing negatively charged lipids leads to an increase in helicity of tau molecule [288]. Formation of membrane-bound tau fibrils has been detected upon binding of tau and dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol monolayers [289]. The initial formation of these structure can further recruit tau dimers and monomers, assembling ordered β-sheet, forming PHFs and neurofibrillary tangles [290].

The tau protein is heavily post-translationally modified [291]. At least 85 known phosphorylation sites have been found in tau; these post-translational modifications are known to decrease tau affinity toward microtubules while increasing its vulnerability to aggregation [292]. In AD brains, tau protein levels are elevated with abnormal hyperphosphorylation [292]. Recent studies have revealed the association between imbalances in lipid metabolism and increased tau phosphorylation [293,294,295]. Disruptions in lipid metabolism can initiate inflammatory responses in the brain, which can activate various kinases and phosphatases involved in phosphorylation signaling pathways. These inflammatory processes can increase the activity of tau phosphatases and kinases, leading to abnormal tau hyperphosphorylation [296,297,298,299]. Dysregulation of PI3K-Akt signaling, which can be caused by imbalances in phosphatidylinositol levels and the structural integrity of lipid rafts, may also lead to aberrant tau phosphorylation through the activation of downstream GSK3β and CDK5, which act as tau phosphokinases [300]. Additionally, cholesterol homeostasis has been linked to the regulation of tau phosphorylation. Research indicates that depleting cholesterol within lipid rafts can activate the raft-dependent Ras/MEK/ERK signaling cascade, resulting in tau phosphorylation at multiple sites [301]. High cholesterol diet can also elevate phosphorylation of tau protein by impairing autophagy [302]. In line with this, both abundant NFT and hyperphosphorylation of tau have been found in brain tissues of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) patients, a disease caused by impairment in intracellular cholesterol trafficking and dysregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis [303].

Multiple lipid-related mechanisms have been proposed to mediate the spreading of tau during neurodegenerative disease progression. Studies have documented tau transport through tunneling nanotubes formed between cells [304, 305]. Vesicle-mediated secretion of tau is mediated through ectosomes shed from plasma membrane [306], or via exosomes organelle hitchhiking [307]. In addition, a non-canonical method of tau secretion is through direct passage across the cell membrane. This involves direct interactions with lipids that support translocation across the plasma membrane. In line with this, a stable tau-lipid complex formation due to interactions between tau and hydrophobic lipid tails has been observed [308]. Moreover, studies from Merezhko et al. and Katsinelos et al. further elucidated the process of direct secretion of tau: 1) recruitment and clustering of tau at the cytosolic side of plasma membrane (PM), which involves tau hyperphosphorylation and interaction with specific lipids such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), cholesterol, and sphingolipids, and (2) subsequent release from the plasma membrane, facilitated by binding of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the extracellular side of plasma membrane [309, 310].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mechanisms of lipid involvement in tau pathology. Schematic summary of the roles of lipids in regulating tau phosphorylation, aggregation, and secretion. Disrupted lipid homeostasis or associated inflammation can trigger kinase activation, which often leads to hyperphosphorylation of tau. Tau monomers interact with negatively charged phospholipids in the membrane which facilitate the formation of tau fibrils and oligos. The direct secretion of tau through membrane is mediated through its interaction with membrane lipids including cholesterol, sphingolipids, and PI(4,5)P2, and further facilitated by HSPGs

Lipid dysregulation and neuroinflammation

Neuroinflammation refers to the inflammatory response within the central nervous system triggered by a variety of factors. It involves the activation of microglia and astrocytes among other immune cells, resulting in the production of inflammatory mediators to function as a defensive mechanism. However, unregulated inflammation, excessive cytokine production, and failure to resolve inflammatory responses can lead to chronic neuroinflammation, which is known to contribute to neurodegenerative disease, such as AD [249, 311,312,313]. The essential role of lipids in modulating neuroinflammation has been long recognized. Particularly, dysregulation of multiple lipid classes and their derivatives has been shown to impact the development of AD through various mechanisms (Fig. 5).

Microglia is the main cell type for removing debris, cytotoxic molecules and plays a major role in neuroinflammation. Microglia specifically express the AD risk gene triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) [79], which is essential for lipid sensing, microglial lipid droplet formation, as well as microglial cholesterol metabolism [48, 82,83,84]. In aging and disease condition, formation of lipid droplets accumulated in microglia has been described [230]. Containing high amount of glycerolipids and low amount of cholesteryl ester, these cells are defective in phagocytosis, producing high levels of reactive oxygen species, and secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines [230]. In neurons, cholesterol promotes the cluster of APP and enhances the release of Aβ [251, 314], which indirectly affects inflammation via further activation of glia. An example of direct involvement of lipids in neuroinflammation is through “substrate presentation”. Cholesterol uptake via binding of lipidated ApoE to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) shifts the membrane structure, leading to the close proximity localization of membrane-bound TNFα (mTNFα) with its hydrolytic enzyme ADAM17, allowing the generation and release of soluble TNFα (sTNFα), which further promotes inflammation [315, 316]. A large number of lipid derivatives under oxidative stress can also regulate neuroinflammation via multiple routes. 27-hydroxycholesterol, derived from cholesterol oxidation by the enzyme CYP46A1, can cross the blood-brain barrier from peripheral to central, upregulating the brain-renin-angiotensin system and inducing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and microglial polarization [317, 318]. 24-hydroxycholesterol, on the other hand, decreases neurotoxic effects through promoting SIRT1/PGC1α/Nrf2 pathway-mediated tau degradation, thus decreases neuroinflammation [319, 320]. Elevation of cholesterol auto-oxidation product 7-ketocholesterol and 7β-hydroxycholesterol [318] has also been observed in AD brain, these oxysterols disrupt peroxisomal function in glia, leading to mitochondrial dysfunctions, oxidative stress, and inflammation [321]. Recent studies have revealed the role of 25-hydroxycholesterol in perturbing astrocytic lipid metabolism [200] and uncovered its effect on potentiating proinflammatory signaling during tau-mediated neurodegeneration [322]. Notably, with previously described roles in inflammatory responses [323], loss of sulfatides in the central nervous system induces marked neuroinflammation in mice, characterized by enhanced microgliosis and astrogliosis [175].

While many lipids promote neuroinflammation, some also functions to reduce and resolve neuroinflammation. Omega-3 fatty acids, DHA and EPA, collectively referred to as specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPM), have been shown to help homeostasis recovery after inflammation [324, 325]. Treatment of DHA and EPA restricts M1 microglial activation and improves phagocytosis of Aβ in microglial cultures [326]. In vivo supplementation of EPA-containing chow food conferred protection against neuroinflammation in multiple aging and AD mouse and rat models [327, 328]. A SPM species neuroprotectin D1 suppresses inflammatory markers COX-2 and TNFα, and induces PPARγ, which protected human neuronal cells from Aβ-induced cell death [329]. Plasmalogens are well-recognized for their antioxidant effect. Studies showed that plasmalogen treatment inhibits neuroinflammation in cells [330] and in vivo [331, 332], while inflammatory factors such as IL-1β and TNFα suppress the synthesis of plasmalogens via down-regulating the expression of its synthesizing enzyme GNPAT [333].

Fig. 5
figure 5

The intercorrelation between lipid and neuroinflammation. Using microglia as an example, this schematic depicts the diverse roles of lipids in regulating neuroinflammation. Alteration of lipid homeostasis can either promote microglial activation (through multiple hydroxylated cholesterol species, HC, or loss of sulfatides), or inhibit microglial activation (anti-oxidation lipids, such as plasmalogen and omega-3 unsaturated fatty acids). Under disease condition, the glycerolipid-enriched lipid-containing microglia exhibits decreased phagocytosis function and increases the production of reactive oxygen species. Prolonged microglial activation contributes to neuroinflammation in AD. Conversely, neuroinflammation further maintains and enhances microglial activation

Therapeutic implications of lipid alterations in AD

The present strategy for management of AD is largely composed of behavioral/lifestyle adjustment, and pharmacological intervention [334]. Treatments approved by the FDA so far mainly function to counteract or delay the cognitive decline. Main drug classes in use for AD therapy are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), which function to increase the availability of acetylcholine, contracting the loss of limbic and neocortical cholinergic innervation in AD [335]. Noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists act by blocking NMDA receptors and associated glutamate neurotransmission to avoid neuronal excitotoxicity in AD [336]. The recent FDA approved Aducanumab [14], Lecanemab [15], and Donanemab [16] are monoclonal antibodies targeting to reduce Aβ plaques. Other treatments including β-secretase inhibitors and copper chelating agents have also been used [147, 337]. Although it is widely acknowledged that lipid metabolic abnormalities are a major contributing factor in the etiology of AD, there has been limited investigation into drugs targeting lipid dysregulation for potential AD therapy. Here we discuss the therapeutic opportunities of applying lipid-modifying treatments for AD via targeting multiple aspects of lipid metabolism, including synthesis, exportation, storage, and modification. We also examine the potential benefits of lipid-related dietary approaches for managing AD.

Targeting lipid synthesis

Statins have been the most successful drug in treating dyslipidemic cardiovascular diseases [338]. They function to lower steroid (e.g., cholesterol) production by inhibiting the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) [339]. Studies from in vitro systems and animal models indicated statins have a strong inhibitory effect on Aβ peptide levels [340,341,342]. In humans, protective effect of statins has been observed on the risk of dementia and AD among patients with normal cognition at baseline [343]. However, follow-up clinical trials focusing on potential AD beneficial effects of statins have generated inconclusive results [344]. It is hypothesized that while lowering cholesterol may reduce Aβ production by abrogating APP processing within lipid rafts, this alteration in membrane cholesterol content might also have negative effects by disrupting the function of channels and receptors embedded in membrane, leading to abnormal neuronal activities.

Promoting lipid efflux

ABCA1 agonist

The cell-surface lipid transporter ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1) mediates the rate-limiting step to transfer lipids (such as cholesterol) for exportation by ApoE [345]. In humans, variants of ABCA1 gene are associated with increased risk of AD [346]. In vivo studies concluded that ABCA1 deficiency increases, while its overexpression reduces Aβ deposition [347, 348]. A recent study has demonstrated that enhancing lipid efflux in glial cells through either LXR agonist treatment or ABCA1 overexpression significantly reduces tau pathology and neurodegeneration in P301S/APOE4 mice [349]. Another study utilizing CS-6253, a peptide mimicking the C-terminus of ApoE that functions to enhance the recycling of ABCA1, has demonstrated promising results in reducing AD-related pathology in animal models [350]. The phase 1 trial testing of CS6253 is currently ongoing among healthy APOE4 carriers [351].

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated APOE2 expression

Considering the well-recognized APOE isoform effect on multiple aspects of AD (including lipid metabolism), a strategy aiming at altering risk allele toward protective allele has been proposed. AAV-mediated APOE2 gene delivery markedly decreased Aβ load in the brains of PDAPP and APP.PS1/TRE4 mice [352]. A follow-up study further confirmed the safety and efficiency of the AAVrh.10-APOE2 delivery method in nonhuman primates [353]. These progresses provided basis for clinical testing of APOE2 gene delivery. A clinical trial assessing AAVrh.10-APOE2 among participants with APOE4 homozygote AD is currently on going [354], the conclusion from this trial would bring valuable information for genotype supplementation therapy in AD.

LXR agonist

Liver X receptors (LXRs) are nuclear receptors functioning as ligand-activated transcription factors that are activated by endogenous oxysterols. LXRs form heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) to regulate gene expression by binding to DNA sequences associated with target genes [355]. When activated, LXRs enhance the expression of various genes associated with cholesterol metabolism, including ABCA1 and APOE, which are critical for cholesterol efflux. LXRs are also considered anti-inflammatory due to its function in inhibiting the transcription of inflammatory genes including TNFα, COX2, IL1β, MM9, and iNOS [355,356,357]. The important roles of LXRs in AD have been supported by numerous studies in vivo. LXR deficiency increases, while LXR activation reduces amyloid plaques and associated neuroinflammation [358, 359]. Two most well studied synthetic LXR agonists are T0901317 and GW3965, both of which have shown very promising effect in preclinical research [360], however, strong adverse effects including enhanced lipogenesis have largely hindered their clinical translation [361]. Evaluations on other compounds such as BMS-852,927 and LXR-623 have been discontinued due to reasons including non-effective or CNS adverse effects [362, 363]. Thus, the application of LXR agonist for treatment of AD remains a challenge, it is important to identify new compounds or methods to facilitate avoiding side effects for the targeting of LXR in neurodegenerative diseases.

Targeting lipid storage

PPARγ agonist

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) belongs to a family of ligand-activated transcription factors that are important in the regulation of glucose and lipid homeostasis. The natural ligands of PPARγ include fatty acids, eicosanoids, oxidized lipoproteins, lysophosphatidic acid, and nitrolinoleic acid [364]. In addition to stimulating the uptake, recycling and net flux of fatty acids [364], they are also known to suppress inflammation by blocking NFκB-dependent gene expression [365, 366]. Activation of PPARγ in AD mouse models has shown protective effect by reducing microglial activation and APP cleavage [367,368,369]. Previous clinical trials have generated inconsistent outcome. An early rosiglitazone study indicated a positive effect on slowing disease progression [370] yet follow-up tests with multiple dosages showed no improvement [371]. Similarly, a large clinical study on pioglitazone demonstrated no disease delaying effects for the onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) AD [372] despite previous positive findings [373, 374]. Another PPARγ agonist T3D-959 showed improvements with possible APOE genotype association during a phase 2 clinical trial [375]. A recent study has also suggested that treatment with genistein (a PPAR agonist) for 12 months improved learning function in AD patients [376].

ACAT1 inhibitors

Excessive cholesteryl-esters (CEs) are often found in the vulnerable regions of AD brain and contribute to neurodegeneration [377]. ACAT1 (acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase 1) is an endoplasmic reticulum-resident enzyme that catalyzes the formation of CE for storage [378]. Inhibiting ACAT1 increases the intracellular free cholesterol (FC) level, which can facilitate lipid secretion [379]. Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of ACAT1 blockade in AD: ablation of ACAT1 gene in 3XTg-AD mice led to great reduction of Aβ levels and ameliorated cognitive deficits, accompanied by an increase of the beneficial 24-hydroxycholesterol [380]; the P301L tau mouse model lacking ACAT1 exhibited up-regulated autophagosome formation and decreased P301L-tau protein content [381]; in AD patient-derived neurons, ACAT1 inhibition resolves the suppressive effect of CE on tau proteostasis [382]. Various small molecular ACAT inhibitors have been previously tested for treating atherosclerosis, some passed the clinical safety test in humans [377], including CI1011 [383], Pactimibe [384], and K604 [385], but have been subsequently abandoned due to lack of efficacy or undisclosed reason(s). However, it would be of interest to evaluate if these candidates can be utilized for treatment of AD. Thus, further clinical studies in a different patient cohort with disease-oriented design of testing regimen are needed for the application of ACAT1 inhibitors in AD.

Targeting lipid modification

Lipolytic enzyme inhibition

The phospholipase signaling pathways regulate a plethora of physiological processes and are often dysregulated in neurodegeneration. Particularly, multiple phospholipase A2 (PLA2) isoforms contribute to AD pathology via producing bioactive molecules that regulate neuroinflammation, oxidation, amyloid processing, lipid remodeling, mitochondrial function, apoptosis, blood-brain barrier function, and the transport of lipids into the brain [386]. For example, hydrolysis of phospholipids by cytosolic PLA2 (cPLA2) produces arachidonic acid (subsequently converts to eicosanoids), and lysophospholipids (can be converted to platelet-activating factors), which promotes neuroinflammation and oxidative stress [387,388,389]. A secretory PLA2 (sPLA2) isoform promotes APP secretion by altering membrane fluidity [390]. Antagonizing PLA2s has been shown to be beneficial in AD. Inhibition of cPLA2 diminishes Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and protects against cognitive deficits in hAPP mice [391]. The sPLA2 inhibitor CHEC-9 inhibits inflammation and protects neurons from degeneration [392]. Multiple inhibitors of the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (p-PLA2) have been tested in clinical studies for AD with mixed results. Tests of Rilapladib have achieved improvement in the executive function/working memory composite among mild to moderate AD patients in a phase 2 study [393]. A phase 1 trial for the second-generation inhibitor SNP318 has just been completed. Studies on GSK2647544 were terminated due to hepatic toxicity via inhibiting cytochrome P450 [394,395,396]. Another Lp-PLA2 inhibitor DPT0416 has been shown to be CNS penetrable and potently reduces brain inflammation in animal studies, it is currently under preclinical research stage. Overall, given the essential roles of PLA2s in AD pathology, targeting specific PLA2 isoforms at the appropriate disease stage may be a valid approach to limit the incidence of AD.

Lipid oxidation modification

The brain is highly enriched in PUFAs, particularly AA, DHA, and EPA [397]. The presence of unsaturated double bonds in these PUFAs makes them particularly vulnerable to oxidation [398]. It has been widely recognized that oxidatively damaged lipids are associated with the pathology of AD due to their neurotoxic characteristics [399]. Natural antioxidants [400,401,402] have been used for reducing oxidation aiming at improving cognitive function, however, their mechanisms of action and efficacy of application are not well defined. Other strategies have been proposed. Oral administration of plasmalogens to rats with ventricle Aβ infusion rescued memory function and improved cerebral lipid profile related to learning ability [403]. Plasmalogen treatment also reduced neuroinflammation in a mouse model of LPS-induced inflammation [332]. Further, oral intake of plasmalogen supplementation extracted from scallops has shown cognitive improving benefits in a subgroup of mild AD patients [404]. These studies suggest elevating plasmalogen may be able to compensate, or antagonize the enhanced oxidation in AD brain, achieving an improved memory function. Brain and plasma contents of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) have been found to be elevated among AD patients [405, 406]. Intriguingly, recent studies using an inhibitor of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), the rate-limiting enzyme mediating the conversion of saturated fatty acids to delta-9 MUFA, have shown beneficial effects in learning and memory [407, 408] with minimal effects on peripheral metabolism [409].

Lipid-modifying dietary treatment

Dietary adjustment is a straightforward strategy for supplementing beneficial lipids to attenuate the pathological process of AD. Dietary enhancement of omega-3 fatty acids (such as DHA and EPA) has shown therapeutic promise by improving multiple aspects of AD pathogenesis. Omega-3 PUFAs are anti-inflammatory lipids through mechanisms including inhibiting cytokine production and promoting anti-inflammatory pathway (such as PPARs) [410,411,412]. They also block Aβ production by inhibiting β- and γ-secretases [256, 413]. Clinical studies of dietary omega-3 PUFA have yielded mixed outcomes. It has been found from the omegAD study that DHA and EPA supplementation over six months does not delay the rate of cognitive decline, but positive effects have been observed in a subset of patients with very mild AD [414]. The Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) of DHA supplementation showed improvement of cognitive function only in APOE4 non-carriers [415]. Combining omega-3 fatty acids with other ingredients (such as Gnotobiota, fish oil, alpha-lipoic acid) has been demonstrated to be effective on improving memory function [416,417,418]. These outcomes suggest that genetic factors, dietary backgrounds, and the specific stages of AD in participants should be considered for effective omega-3 PUFA dietary treatment. Additionally, combination interventions of omega-3 PUFAs with other treatments could provide insights into synergistic effects and more comprehensive therapeutic strategies.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Lipid homeostasis is crucial for the physiological function of organisms. In the CNS, altered lipid homeostasis and disrupted lipid metabolism signaling pathways are often seen in aging and neurodegeneration. A plethora of GWAS have identified variants in genes involved in lipid-modifying processes such as transportation, synthesis, and conversion, suggesting altered lipid metabolism may serve as key drivers of LOAD. However, the chemical diversity and functional heterogeneity of lipids have long posed challenges in characterizing lipid alterations and understanding their biological implications in AD. In this review, we provided an overview of recent advancements in lipidomics techniques and their applications in AD research. Current findings strongly support the involvement of specific lipid classes, including sphingolipids, cholesterol, and phospholipids, in AD pathology. This is further underscored by numerous studies elucidating the molecular mechanisms by which lipids influence multiple pathological aspects of AD. These insights lay a solid foundation for the identification of diagnostic lipid biomarkers and the development of lipid-related therapies.

Considering the complexity of brain lipids and the variety of disease etiology, one of the emerging focuses for future development of lipidomics is oriented towards enhanced resolution and capacity in lipid identification and quantification. For example, differentiating closely-related lipid derivatives (such as different location of double bond(s)) may help uncover the novel function of un-characterized lipid species that could potentially serve as disease markers. Also, measuring lipidome on a single-cell resolution is expected to provide unprecedented precision on cellular and micro-environmental disease mechanisms. Moreover, integrating lipidomics with other omics approaches, coupled with advanced bioinformatics methods such as artificial intelligence, will enable a more comprehensive analysis of molecular networks associated with different pathological phenotypes. This multidisciplinary approach is expected to revolutionize our understanding of AD, offering new insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Consequently, the future application of lipidomics in AD research represents a significant leap forward in our ability to explore and intervene this complex neurodegenerative disorder.

The crosstalk of lipids and AD pathologies such as Aβ, tau, and neuroinflammation plays significantly role in modulating neurodegeneration. As essential intracellular bioactive molecules and key components of cell membrane, lipids also influence cellular functions by participating in oxidative stress responses and mediating synaptic activities among other mechanisms. Further understanding of these connections will provide guidance for leveraging lipidomics information during targeted therapy of these disease mechanisms. Moreover, integrating lipidomics into the evaluation of the diagnostic and treatment efficacy will broaden our options for developing personalized treatment strategies and identifying new biomarkers for AD. Ongoing research aimed at uncovering novel mechanisms of lipid involvement in AD is poised to provide valuable insights that will guide future data-driven clinical investigations.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

AA:

Arachidonic acid

ACAT:

Acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase

AChEIs:

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

ADAM17:

A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17

AICD:

APP intracellular domain

APCI:

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization

APOE:

Apolipoprotein E

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

APPI:

Atmospheric pressure photoionization

ARSA:

Arylsulfatase A

Aβ:

Amyloid beta

BMP:

Bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate

C1P:

Ceramide-1-phosphate

CE:

Cholesteryl-ester

CERK:

Ceramide kinase

CerS:

Ceramide synthases

CGT:

Ceramide galactosyltransferase

CID:

Collision-induced dissociation

CNS:

Central nervous system

COX:

Cyclooxygenase

CST:

Cerebroside sulfotransferase

CYP46A1:

Cytochrome P450 family 46 subfamily A member 1

DAG:

Diacylglycerol

DESI:

Desorption electrospray ionization

DHA:

Docosahexaenoic acid

EPA:

Eicosapentaenoic acid

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

FC:

Free cholesterol

FIA:

Flow-injection mode

GalCer:

Galactosylceramide

GC:

Gas chromatography

GM1:

Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside

GPCR:

G protein-coupled receptors

GWAS:

Genome-wide association studies

HILIC:

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography

HMG-CoA:

3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A

HSPGs:

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans

LC:

Liquid chromatography

LC-PUFAs:

Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids

LD:

Lipid droplet

LDLR:

Low density lipoprotein receptor

LIPID MAPS:

LIPID Metabolites and Pathways Strategy

LXR:

Liver X receptor

m/z:

Mass-to-charge ratios

MAG:

Monoacylglycerol

MALDI:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

MDMS:

Multidimensional MS

MS:

Mass spectrometry

MUFA:

Monounsaturated fatty acids

NFT:

Neurofibrillary tangles

NMDA:

Noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate

NOS:

Nitric oxide synthases

NPLC:

Normal phase liquid chromatography

PA:

Phosphatidic acid

PAPS:

Phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate

PC:

Phosphatidylcholine

PE:

Phosphatidylethanolamine

PG:

Phosphatidylglycerol

PHF:

Paired helical filament

PI:

Phosphatidylinositol

PI(3)P:

Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate

PLA2 :

Phospholipase A2

PLA2 :

Phospholipase A2

PM:

Plasma membrane

PPARγ:

Peroxisomes proliferator-activated receptor gamma

ppm:

Parts per million

PS:

Phosphatidylserine

PSEN1:

Presenilin 1

PSEN2:

Presenilin 2

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

RPLC:

Reversed phase liquid chromatography

RXR:

Retinoid X receptor

S1P:

Sphingosine-1-phosphate

SIMS:

Secondary ion mass spectrometry

SM:

Sphingomyelin

SMase:

Sphingomyelinase

SMS:

Sphingomyelin synthase

ST:

Sulfatide

TAG:

Triacylglycerol

TOF:

Time-of-flight

TREM2:

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2

UPLC:

Ultra performance liquid chromatography

References

  1. Magalingam KB, Radhakrishnan A, Ping NS, Haleagrahara N. Current concepts of neurodegenerative mechanisms in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3740461.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. The neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2009;66(2):200–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics, System. Mortality 2018–2021 on CDC WONDER online database, released in 2021. National Center for Health Statistics; 2021. Accessed in December, 2023. http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10-expanded.html.

  4. 2024 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(5):3708– 821.

  5. Bekris LM, Yu CE, Bird TD, Tsuang DW. Genetics of Alzheimer disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010;23(4):213–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bloom GS. Amyloid-beta and tau: the trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(4):505–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang W, Xiao D, Mao Q, Xia H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):267.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Norat P, Soldozy S, Sokolowski JD, Gorick CM, Kumar JS, Chae Y, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurological disorders: exploring mitochondrial transplantation. NPJ Regen Med. 2020;5(1):22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen SJ, Watson JJ, Dawbarn D. The neurotrophins and their role in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2011;9(4):559–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bretou M, Sannerud R, Escamilla-Ayala A, Leroy T, Vrancx C, Van Acker ZP, et al. Accumulation of APP C-terminal fragments causes endolysosomal dysfunction through the dysregulation of late endosome to lysosome-ER contact sites. Dev Cell. 2024;59(12):1571–92. e9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cataldo AM, Peterhoff CM, Troncoso JC, Gomez-Isla T, Hyman BT, Nixon RA. Endocytic pathway abnormalities precede amyloid beta deposition in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease and Down syndrome: differential effects of APOE genotype and presenilin mutations. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(1):277–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uddin MS, Stachowiak A, Mamun AA, Tzvetkov NT, Takeda S, Atanasov AG, et al. Autophagy and Alzheimer’s Disease: from Molecular mechanisms to therapeutic implications. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:04.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barmaki H, Nourazarian A, Khaki-Khatibi F. Proteostasis and neurodegeneration: a closer look at autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1281338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, Weinreb PH, Williams L, Maier M, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Abeta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016;537(7618):50–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, Lu M, Ardayfio P, Sparks J, et al. Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;330(6):512–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(2):112–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S, Soni KG, Semache M, Casavant S, Fortier M, Pan L, et al. Lipolysis and the integrated physiology of lipid energy metabolism. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;95(3):117–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mutlu AS, Duffy J, Wang MC. Lipid metabolism and lipid signals in aging and longevity. Dev Cell. 2021;56(10):1394–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shevchenko A, Simons K. Lipidomics: coming to grips with lipid diversity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(8):593–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fahy E, Subramaniam S, Brown HA, Glass CK, Merrill AH Jr., Murphy RC, et al. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(5):839–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fahy E, Subramaniam S, Murphy RC, Nishijima M, Raetz CR, Shimizu T, et al. Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(SupplSuppl):S9–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Han X, Gross RW. The foundations and development of lipidomics. J Lipid Res. 2022;63(2):100164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamilton JA, Hillard CJ, Spector AA, Watkins PA. Brain uptake and utilization of fatty acids, lipids and lipoproteins: application to neurological disorders. J Mol Neurosci. 2007;33(1):2–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sastry PS. Lipids of nervous tissue: composition and metabolism. Prog Lipid Res. 1985;24(2):69–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lingwood D, Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science. 2010;327(5961):46–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saher G, Quintes S, Nave KA. Cholesterol: a novel regulatory role in myelin formation. Neuroscientist. 2011;17(1):79–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jove M, Mota-Martorell N, Obis E, Sol J, Martin-Gari M, Ferrer I et al. Lipid adaptations against oxidative challenge in the healthy adult human brain. Antioxid (Basel) 2023;12(1).

  29. Dyall SC. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and the brain: a review of the independent and shared effects of EPA, DPA and DHA. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronald L, Schnaar RS, Michael Tiemeyer, and Taroh Kinoshita. In: Varki A CR, Esko JD, Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet] 4th edition, Cold et al. Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2022.

  31. Sipione S, Monyror J, Galleguillos D, Steinberg N, Kadam V. Gangliosides in the brain: physiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic applications. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:572965.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Osetrova M, Tkachev A, Mair W, Guijarro Larraz P, Efimova O, Kurochkin I, et al. Lipidome atlas of the adult human brain. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Foley P. Lipids in Alzheimer’s disease: a century-old story. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801(8):750–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bellenguez C, Kucukali F, Jansen IE, Kleineidam L, Moreno-Grau S, Amin N, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat Genet. 2022;54(4):412–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Rojas I, Moreno-Grau S, Tesi N, Grenier-Boley B, Andrade V, Jansen IE, et al. Common variants in Alzheimer’s disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3417.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haney MS, Palovics R, Munson CN, Long C, Johansson PK, Yip O, et al. APOE4/4 is linked to damaging lipid droplets in Alzheimer’s disease microglia. Nature. 2024;628(8006):154–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yin F. Lipid metabolism and Alzheimer’s disease: clinical evidence, mechanistic link and therapeutic promise. FEBS J. 2023;290(6):1420–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gamba P, Testa G, Gargiulo S, Staurenghi E, Poli G, Leonarduzzi G. Oxidized cholesterol as the driving force behind the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:119.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y, Rogaeva EA, Levesque G, Ikeda M, et al. Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1995;375(6534):754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murrell J, Farlow M, Ghetti B, Benson MD. A mutation in the amyloid precursor protein associated with hereditary Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 1991;254(5028):97–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chartier-Harlin MC, Crawford F, Houlden H, Warren A, Hughes D, Fidani L, et al. Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease caused by mutations at codon 717 of the beta-amyloid precursor protein gene. Nature. 1991;353(6347):844–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goate A, Chartier-Harlin MC, Mullan M, Brown J, Crawford F, Fidani L, et al. Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1991;349(6311):704–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, et al. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(5):1977–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yamazaki Y, Zhao N, Caulfield TR, Liu CC, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(9):501–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rebeck GW. The role of APOE on lipid homeostasis and inflammation in normal brains. J Lipid Res. 2017;58(8):1493–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Harold D, Abraham R, Hollingworth P, Sims R, Gerrish A, Hamshere ML, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1088–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jones L, Holmans PA, Hamshere ML, Harold D, Moskvina V, Ivanov D, et al. Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e13950.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Cella M, Mallinson K, Ulrich JD, Young KL, Robinette ML, et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell. 2015;160(6):1061–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Preman P, Arranz AM. A neuron-specific interaction between Alzheimer’s disease risk factors SORL1, APOE, and CLU. Cell Rep. 2023;42(9):113129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yvan-Charvet L, Wang N, Tall AR. Role of HDL, ABCA1, and ABCG1 transporters in cholesterol efflux and immune responses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(2):139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sakae N, Liu CC, Shinohara M, Frisch-Daiello J, Ma L, Yamazaki Y, et al. ABCA7 Deficiency accelerates amyloid-beta generation and Alzheimer’s neuronal Pathology. J Neurosci. 2016;36(13):3848–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kawatani K, Holm ML, Starling SC, Martens YA, Zhao J, Lu W, et al. ABCA7 deficiency causes neuronal dysregulation by altering mitochondrial lipid metabolism. Mol Psychiatry. 2024;29(3):809–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li L, Hua L, Fan H, He Y, Xu W, Zhang L, et al. Interplay of PKD3 with SREBP1 promotes cell growth via upregulating lipogenesis in prostate Cancer cells. J Cancer. 2019;10(25):6395–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun N, Shen C, Zhang L, Wu X, Yu Y, Yang X, et al. Hepatic kruppel-like factor 16 (KLF16) targets PPARalpha to improve steatohepatitis and insulin resistance. Gut. 2021;70(11):2183–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Balla T. Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):1019–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Magno L, Lessard CB, Martins M, Lang V, Cruz P, Asi Y, et al. Alzheimer’s disease phospholipase C-gamma-2 (PLCG2) protective variant is a functional hypermorph. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Maguire E, Menzies GE, Phillips T, Sasner M, Williams HM, Czubala MA, et al. PIP2 depletion and altered endocytosis caused by expression of Alzheimer’s disease-protective variant PLCgamma2 R522. EMBO J. 2021;40(17):e105603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Waddell GL, Drew EE, Rupp HP, Hansen SD. Mechanisms controlling membrane recruitment and activation of the autoinhibited SHIP1 inositol 5-phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(8):105022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schneider N, Hauser J, Oliveira M, Cazaubon E, Mottaz SC, O’Neill BV et al. Sphingomyelin in Brain and Cognitive Development: Preliminary Data. eNeuro 2019;6(4).

  60. MacArthur JM, Bishop JR, Stanford KI, Wang L, Bensadoun A, Witztum JL, et al. Liver heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins independently of LDL receptor family members. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(1):153–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mahley RW, Ji ZS. Remnant lipoprotein metabolism: key pathways involving cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans and apolipoprotein E. J Lipid Res. 1999;40(1):1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. White PJ, McGarrah RW, Grimsrud PA, Tso SC, Yang WH, Haldeman JM, et al. The BCKDH kinase and Phosphatase Integrate BCAA and lipid metabolism via regulation of ATP-Citrate lyase. Cell Metab. 2018;27(6):1281–93. e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gao H, Guo Y, Yan Q, Yang W, Li R, Lin S et al. Lipoatrophy and metabolic disturbance in mice with adipose-specific deletion of kindlin-2. JCI Insight 2019;4(13).

  64. Chen SZ, Ning LF, Xu X, Jiang WY, Xing C, Jia WP, et al. The miR-181d-regulated metalloproteinase Adamts1 enzymatically impairs adipogenesis via ECM remodeling. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(11):1778–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, George-Hyslop PH, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo SH, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1993;43(8):1467–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Huang Y, Mahley RW, Apolipoprotein E, Pt. 3–12.

  67. Mahley RW, Apolipoprotein E. Cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology. Science. 1988;240(4852):622–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang N, Silver DL, Thiele C, Tall AR. ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) functions as a cholesterol efflux regulatory protein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(26):23742–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sun Y, Li X. Cholesterol efflux mechanism revealed by structural analysis of human ABCA1 conformational states. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1(3):238–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hollingworth P, Harold D, Sims R, Gerrish A, Lambert JC, Carrasquillo MM, et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(5):429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang N, Lan D, Gerbod-Giannone M, Linsel-Nitschke P, Jehle AW, Chen W, et al. ATP-binding cassette transporter A7 (ABCA7) binds apolipoprotein A-I and mediates cellular phospholipid but not cholesterol efflux. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(44):42906–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. von Maydell D, Wright S, Bonner JM, Staab C, Spitaleri A, Liu L et al. Single-cell atlas of ABCA7 loss-of-function reveals impaired neuronal respiration via choline-dependent lipid imbalances. bioRxiv. 2024.

  73. Rogaeva E, Meng Y, Lee JH, Gu Y, Kawarai T, Zou F, et al. The neuronal sortilin-related receptor SORL1 is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 2007;39(2):168–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jensen AMG, Raska J, Fojtik P, Monti G, Lunding M, Bartova S, et al. The SORL1 p.Y1816C variant causes impaired endosomal dimerization and autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024;121(37):e2408262121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Conlon DM. Role of sortilin in lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2019;30(3):198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Asaro A, Sinha R, Bakun M, Kalnytska O, Carlo-Spiewok AS, Rubel T et al. ApoE4 disrupts interaction of sortilin with fatty acid-binding protein 7 essential to promote lipid signaling. J Cell Sci 2021;134(20).

  77. Ko YA, Billheimer JT, Lyssenko NN, Kueider-Paisley A, Wolk DA, Arnold SE, et al. ApoJ/Clusterin concentrations are determinants of cerebrospinal fluid cholesterol efflux capacity and reduced levels are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Laslo A, Laslo L, Arbanasi EM, Ujlaki-Nagi AA, Chinezu L, Ivanescu AD, et al. Pathways to Alzheimer’s Disease: the intersecting roles of Clusterin and apolipoprotein E in amyloid-beta regulation and neuronal health. Pathophysiology. 2024;31(4):545–58.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):107–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Colonna M. The biology of TREM receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(9):580–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gouna G, Klose C, Bosch-Queralt M, Liu L, Gokce O, Schifferer M et al. TREM2-dependent lipid droplet biogenesis in phagocytes is required for remyelination. J Exp Med 2021;218(10).

  83. Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, Lianoglou S, Przybyla L, Davis SS, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron. 2020;105(5):837–54. e9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wei W, Zhang L, Xin W, Pan Y, Tatenhorst L, Hao Z, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial lipid droplet formation and represses post-ischemic brain injury. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;170:115962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sims R, van der Lee SJ, Naj AC, Bellenguez C, Badarinarayan N, Jakobsdottir J, et al. Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2017;49(9):1373–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Jackson JT, Mulazzani E, Nutt SL, Masters SL. The role of PLCgamma2 in immunological disorders, cancer, and neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2021;297(2):100905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(12):1452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Samuels JD, Moore KA, Ennerfelt HE, Johnson AM, Walsh AE, Price RJ, et al. The Alzheimer’s disease risk factor INPP5D restricts neuroprotective microglial responses in amyloid beta-mediated pathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(11):4908–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Wit M, Belykh A, Sumara G. Protein kinase D (PKD) on the crossroad of lipid absorption, synthesis and utilization. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2024;1871(2):119653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Tellier E, Canault M, Rebsomen L, Bonardo B, Juhan-Vague I, Nalbone G, et al. The shedding activity of ADAM17 is sequestered in lipid rafts. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(20):3969–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kothari V, Tang J, He Y, Kramer F, Kanter JE, Bornfeldt KE. ADAM17 boosts cholesterol efflux and downstream effects of High-Density Lipoprotein on Inflammatory pathways in Macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(6):1854–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Wilsie LC, Chanchani S, Navaratna D, Orlando RA. Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans contribute to intracellular lipid accumulation in adipocytes. Lipids Health Dis. 2005;4:2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Wei Y, Xiong ZJ, Li J, Zou C, Cairo CW, Klassen JS, et al. Crystal structures of human lysosomal EPDR1 reveal homology with the superfamily of bacterial lipoprotein transporters. Commun Biol. 2019;2:52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Deshmukh AS, Peijs L, Beaudry JL, Jespersen NZ, Nielsen CH, Ma T, et al. Proteomics-based comparative mapping of the secretomes of Human Brown and White adipocytes reveals EPDR1 as a Novel Batokine. Cell Metab. 2019;30(5):963–75. e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Kozlova A, Zhang S, Sudwarts A, Zhang H, Smirnou S, Sun X et al. Alzheimer’s disease risk allele of PICALM causes detrimental lipid droplets in microglia. Res Sq 2024.

  96. Hernandez-Diaz S, Soukup SF. The role of lipids in autophagy and its implication in neurodegeneration. Cell Stress. 2020;4(7):167–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ford MG, Pearse BM, Higgins MK, Vallis Y, Owen DJ, Gibson A, et al. Simultaneous binding of PtdIns(4,5)P2 and clathrin by AP180 in the nucleation of clathrin lattices on membranes. Science. 2001;291(5506):1051–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Paveskovic M, De-Paula RB, Ojelade SA, Tantry EK, Kochukov MY, Bao S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease risk gene CD2AP is a dose-sensitive determinant of synaptic structure and plasticity. Hum Mol Genet. 2024;33(20):1815–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Pant S, Sharma M, Patel K, Caplan S, Carr CM, Grant BD. AMPH-1/Amphiphysin/Bin1 functions with RME-1/Ehd1 in endocytic recycling. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(12):1399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Jones L, Harold D, Williams J. Genetic evidence for the involvement of lipid metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801(8):754–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Jang MK, Lee S, Jung MH. RNA-Seq analysis reveals a negative role of KLF16 in Adipogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0162238.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Kim M, Wende H, Walcher J, Kuhnemund J, Cheret C, Kempa S, et al. Maf links Neuregulin1 signaling to cholesterol synthesis in myelinating Schwann cells. Genes Dev. 2018;32(9–10):645–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Han X, Gross RW. Global analyses of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples by ESI mass spectrometry: a bridge to lipidomics. J Lipid Res. 2003;44(6):1071–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Yang K, Han X, Lipidomics. Techniques, applications, and outcomes related to Biomedical sciences. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(11):954–69.

  105. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226(1):497–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Breil C, Abert Vian M, Zemb T, Kunz W, Chemat F. Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for solid-liquid-liquid extraction of lipids from microorganisms. Comprehension of Solvatation mechanisms and towards substitution with alternative solvents. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(4).

  108. Matyash V, Liebisch G, Kurzchalia TV, Shevchenko A, Schwudke D. Lipid extraction by methyl-tert-butyl ether for high-throughput lipidomics. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(5):1137–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Lofgren L, Stahlman M, Forsberg GB, Saarinen S, Nilsson R, Hansson GI. The BUME method: a novel automated chloroform-free 96-well total lipid extraction method for blood plasma. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(8):1690–700.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Han X, Gross RW. Shotgun lipidomics: electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2005;24(3):367–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Martin AJ, Synge RL. A new form of chromatogram employing two liquid phases: a theory of chromatography. 2. Application to the micro-determination of the higher monoamino-acids in proteins. Biochem J. 1941;35(12):1358–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Horvath CG, Preiss BA, Lipsky SR. Fast liquid chromatography: an investigation of operating parameters and the separation of nucleotides on pellicular ion exchangers. Anal Chem. 1967;39(12):1422–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Alpert AJ. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J Chromatogr. 1990;499:177–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science. 1989;246(4926):64–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Robb DB, Covey TR, Bruins AP. Atmospheric pressure photoionization: an ionization method for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2000;72(15):3653–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Hillenkamp F, Karas M, Beavis RC, Chait BT. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers. Anal Chem. 1991;63(24):A1193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Takats Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science. 2004;306(5695):471–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Li M, Yang L, Bai Y, Liu H. Analytical methods in lipidomics and their applications. Anal Chem. 2014;86(1):161–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Samfors S, Fletcher JS. Lipid diversity in cells and tissue using imaging SIMS. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2020;13(1):249–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Han X, Gross RW. Quantitative analysis and molecular species fingerprinting of triacylglyceride molecular species directly from lipid extracts of biological samples by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2001;295(1):88–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Wang M, Wang C, Han RH, Han X. Novel advances in shotgun lipidomics for biology and medicine. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;61:83–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Han X, Yang K, Yang J, Fikes KN, Cheng H, Gross RW. Factors influencing the electrospray intrasource separation and selective ionization of glycerophospholipids. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006;17(2):264–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jennifer L, Johnson LAJ. Homeostasis of lipid metabolism in disorders of the brain. 2021.

  124. Fantini J, Barrantes FJ. Sphingolipid/cholesterol regulation of neurotransmitter receptor conformation and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788(11):2345–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Codini M, Garcia-Gil M, Albi E. Cholesterol and sphingolipid enriched lipid rafts as therapeutic targets in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(2).

  126. Jesko H, Stepien A, Lukiw WJ, Strosznajder RP. The Cross-talk between sphingolipids and insulin-like growth factor signaling: significance for aging and neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(5):3501–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Czubowicz K, Jesko H, Wencel P, Lukiw WJ, Strosznajder RP. The role of Ceramide and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(8):5436–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Crivelli SM, Giovagnoni C, Visseren L, Scheithauer AL, de Wit N, den Hoedt S, et al. Sphingolipids in Alzheimer’s disease, how can we target them? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;159:214–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Couttas TA, Kain N, Suchowerska AK, Quek LE, Turner N, Fath T, et al. Loss of ceramide synthase 2 activity, necessary for myelin biosynthesis, precedes tau pathology in the cortical pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;43:89–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Olsen ASB, Faergeman NJ. Sphingolipids: membrane microdomains in brain development, function and neurological diseases. Open Biol 2017;7(5).

  131. Han X, D MH, McKeel DW Jr., Kelley J, Morris JC. Substantial sulfatide deficiency and ceramide elevation in very early Alzheimer’s disease: potential role in disease pathogenesis. J Neurochem. 2002;82(4):809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. He X, Huang Y, Li B, Gong CX, Schuchman EH. Deregulation of sphingolipid metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(3):398–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Mielke MM, Haughey NJ, Bandaru VV, Schech S, Carrick R, Carlson MC, et al. Plasma ceramides are altered in mild cognitive impairment and predict cognitive decline and hippocampal volume loss. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(5):378–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Filippov V, Song MA, Zhang K, Vinters HV, Tung S, Kirsch WM, et al. Increased ceramide in brains with Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29(3):537–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Huang HX, Inglese P, Tang J, Yagoubi R, Correia GDS, Horneffer-van der Sluis VM, et al. Mass spectrometry imaging highlights dynamic patterns of lipid co-expression with Abeta plaques in mouse and human brains. J Neurochem. 2024;168(7):1193–214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Akyol S, Ugur Z, Yilmaz A, Ustun I, Gorti SKK, Oh K et al. Lipid Profiling of Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Highlights Enrichment in Glycerol(phospho)lipid, and Sphingolipid Metabolism. Cells 2021;10(10).

  137. Bandaru VV, Troncoso J, Wheeler D, Pletnikova O, Wang J, Conant K, et al. ApoE4 disrupts sterol and sphingolipid metabolism in Alzheimer’s but not normal brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(4):591–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Cutler RG, Kelly J, Storie K, Pedersen WA, Tammara A, Hatanpaa K, et al. Involvement of oxidative stress-induced abnormalities in ceramide and cholesterol metabolism in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(7):2070–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Katsel P, Li C, Haroutunian V. Gene expression alterations in the sphingolipid metabolism pathways during progression of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a shift toward ceramide accumulation at the earliest recognizable stages of Alzheimer’s disease? Neurochem Res. 2007;32(4–5):845–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Pettegrew JW, Panchalingam K, Hamilton RL, McClure RJ. Brain membrane phospholipid alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Res. 2001;26(7):771–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Baloni P, Arnold M, Buitrago L, Nho K, Moreno H, Huynh K, et al. Multi-omic analyses characterize the ceramide/sphingomyelin pathway as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):1074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Yuyama K, Mitsutake S, Igarashi Y. Pathological roles of ceramide and its metabolites in metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1841(5):793–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Huang Y, Tanimukai H, Liu F, Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I, Gong CX. Elevation of the level and activity of acid ceramidase in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(12):3489–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Jesko H, Okada T, Strosznajder RP, Nakamura S. Sphingosine kinases modulate the secretion of amyloid beta precursor protein from SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: the role of alpha-synuclein. Folia Neuropathol. 2014;52(1):70–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Couttas TA, Kain N, Daniels B, Lim XY, Shepherd C, Kril J, et al. Loss of the neuroprotective factor sphingosine 1-phosphate early in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Presa N, Gomez-Larrauri A, Dominguez-Herrera A, Trueba M, Gomez-Munoz A. Novel signaling aspects of ceramide 1-phosphate. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2020;1865(4):158630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Uranbileg B, Isago H, Sakai E, Kubota M, Saito Y, Kurano M. Alzheimer’s disease manifests abnormal sphingolipid metabolism. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024;16:1368839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Svennerholm L, Gottfries CG. Membrane lipids, selectively diminished in Alzheimer brains, suggest synapse loss as a primary event in early-onset form (type I) and demyelination in late-onset form (type II). J Neurochem. 1994;62(3):1039–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Hejazi L, Wong JW, Cheng D, Proschogo N, Ebrahimi D, Garner B, et al. Mass and relative elution time profiling: two-dimensional analysis of sphingolipids in Alzheimer’s disease brains. Biochem J. 2011;438(1):165–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Yu RK, Tsai YT, Ariga T, Yanagisawa M. Structures, biosynthesis, and functions of gangliosides–an overview. J Oleo Sci. 2011;60(10):537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Bernardo A, Harrison FE, McCord M, Zhao J, Bruchey A, Davies SS, et al. Elimination of GD3 synthase improves memory and reduces amyloid-beta plaque load in transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(11):1777–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Taki T. An approach to glycobiology from glycolipidomics: ganglioside molecular scanning in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease by TLC-blot/matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight MS. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35(10):1642–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Kracun I, Kalanj S, Talan-Hranilovic J, Cosovic C. Cortical distribution of gangliosides in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 1992;20(3):433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Eckhardt M. The role and metabolism of sulfatide in the nervous system. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;37(2–3):93–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Stoffyn PJ. The structure and chemistry of sulfatides. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1966;43(2):69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Kyogashima M, Tamiya-Koizumi K, Ehara T, Li G, Hu R, Hara A, et al. Rapid demonstration of diversity of sulfatide molecular species from biological materials by MALDI-TOF MS. Glycobiology. 2006;16(8):719–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Takahashi T, Suzuki T. Role of sulfatide in normal and pathological cells and tissues. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(8):1437–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Svennerholm L, Stallberg-Stenhagen S. Changes in the fatty acid composition of cerebrosides and sulfatides of human nervous tissue with age. J Lipid Res. 1968;9(2):215–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Torello LB, Yates AJ, Hart R, Leon KS. A comparative-evolutionary study of lipids in the aging brain of mice. Neurobiol Aging. 1986;7(5):337–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Han X. Potential mechanisms contributing to sulfatide depletion at the earliest clinically recognizable stage of Alzheimer’s disease: a tale of shotgun lipidomics. J Neurochem. 2007;103(1):171–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Cheng H, Wang M, Li JL, Cairns NJ, Han X. Specific changes of sulfatide levels in individuals with pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease: an early event in disease pathogenesis. J Neurochem. 2013;127(6):733–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Gonzalez de San Roman E, Manuel I, Giralt MT, Ferrer I, Rodriguez-Puertas R. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) of cortical lipids from preclinical to severe stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2017;1859(9 Pt B):1604–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Zimmer VC, Lauer AA, Haupenthal V, Stahlmann CP, Mett J, Grosgen S, et al. A bidirectional link between sulfatide and Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Chem Biol. 2024;31(2):265–83. e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Yuki D, Sugiura Y, Zaima N, Akatsu H, Hashizume Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Hydroxylated and non-hydroxylated sulfatide are distinctly distributed in the human cerebral cortex. Neuroscience. 2011;193:44–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Sexton CE, Kalu UG, Filippini N, Mackay CE, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(12):e23225–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Garnier-Crussard A, Cotton F, Krolak-Salmon P, Chetelat G. White matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s disease: beyond vascular contribution. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(8):3738–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Xu Z, He S, Begum MM, Han X. Myelin lipid alterations in neurodegenerative diseases: Landscape and pathogenic implications. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2024;41(16–18):1073–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Marbois BN, Faull KF, Fluharty AL, Raval-Fernandes S, Rome LH. Analysis of sulfatide from rat cerebellum and multiple sclerosis white matter by negative ion electrospray mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1484(1):59–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Pintado-Sierra M, Garcia-Alvarez I, Bribian A, Medina-Rodriguez EM, Lebron-Aguilar R, Garrido L, et al. A comprehensive profiling of sulfatides in myelin from mouse brain using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution accurate tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;951:89–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Blomqvist M, Boren J, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Mansson JE, Stahlman M. High-throughput analysis of sulfatides in cerebrospinal fluid using automated extraction and UPLC-MS/MS. J Lipid Res. 2017;58(7):1482–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Cedazo-Minguez A, Cowburn RF. Apolipoprotein E: a major piece in the Alzheimer’s disease puzzle. J Cell Mol Med. 2001;5(3):254–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Han X, Cheng H, Fryer JD, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM. Novel role for apolipoprotein E in the central nervous system. Modulation of sulfatide content. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(10):8043–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Cheng H, Zhou Y, Holtzman DM, Han X. Apolipoprotein E mediates sulfatide depletion in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(7):1188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Han X. The pathogenic implication of abnormal interaction between apolipoprotein E isoforms, amyloid-beta peptides, and sulfatides in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2010;41(2–3):97–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Qiu S, Palavicini JP, Wang J, Gonzalez NS, He S, Dustin E, et al. Adult-onset CNS myelin sulfatide deficiency is sufficient to cause Alzheimer’s disease-like neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Coetzee T, Fujita N, Dupree J, Shi R, Blight A, Suzuki K, et al. Myelination in the absence of galactocerebroside and sulfatide: normal structure with abnormal function and regional instability. Cell. 1996;86(2):209–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Palavicini JP, Wang C, Chen L, Ahmar S, Higuera JD, Dupree JL, et al. Novel molecular insights into the critical role of sulfatide in myelin maintenance/function. J Neurochem. 2016;139(1):40–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Marcus J, Honigbaum S, Shroff S, Honke K, Rosenbluth J, Dupree JL. Sulfatide is essential for the maintenance of CNS myelin and axon structure. Glia. 2006;53(4):372–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Potter KA, Kern MJ, Fullbright G, Bielawski J, Scherer SS, Yum SW, et al. Central nervous system dysfunction in a mouse model of FA2H deficiency. Glia. 2011;59(7):1009–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Dustin E, McQuiston AR, Honke K, Palavicini JP, Han X, Dupree JL. Adult-onset depletion of sulfatide leads to axonal degeneration with relative myelin sparing. Glia. 2023;71(9):2285–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Carmichael OT, Kuller LH, Lopez OL, Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Lu A, et al. Cerebral ventricular changes associated with transitions between normal cognitive function, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21(1):14–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Nestor SM, Rupsingh R, Borrie M, Smith M, Accomazzi V, Wells JL, et al. Ventricular enlargement as a possible measure of Alzheimer’s disease progression validated using the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative database. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 9):2443–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Palavicini JP, Ding L, Pan M, Qiu S, Wang H, Shen Q et al. Sulfatide Deficiency, an Early Alzheimer’s Lipidomic Signature, Causes Brain Ventricular Enlargement in the Absence of Classical Neuropathological Hallmarks. Int J Mol Sci 2022;24(1).

  184. Morris JK, Honea RA, Vidoni ED, Swerdlow RH, Burns JM. Is Alzheimer’s disease a systemic disease? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842(9):1340–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. He S, Qiu S, Pan M, Palavicini JP, Wang H, Li X, et al. Central nervous system sulfatide deficiency as a causal factor for bladder disorder in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Transl Med. 2023;13(7):e1332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Brunnstrom HR, Englund EM. Cause of death in patients with dementia disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(4):488–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Flores-Cordero JA, Perez-Perez A, Jimenez-Cortegana C, Alba G, Flores-Barragan A, Sanchez-Margalet V. Obesity as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Role of Leptin. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(9).

  188. Tsai CL, Pan CY, Chen FC, Huang TH, Tsai MC, Chuang CY. Differences in neurocognitive performance and metabolic and inflammatory indices in male adults with obesity as a function of regular exercise. Exp Physiol. 2019;104(11):1650–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Knight EM, Martins IV, Gumusgoz S, Allan SM, Lawrence CB. High-fat diet-induced memory impairment in triple-transgenic Alzheimer’s disease (3xTgAD) mice is independent of changes in amyloid and tau pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(8):1821–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Palavicini JP, Chen J, Wang C, Wang J, Qin C, Baeuerle E, et al. Early disruption of nerve mitochondrial and myelin lipid homeostasis in obesity-induced diabetes. JCI Insight. 2020;5:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Roh E, Kim MS. Brain regulation of Energy Metabolism. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2016;31(4):519–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Furlan A, Petrus P. Brain-body communication in metabolic control. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2023;34(12):813–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Qiu S, He S, Wang J, Wang H, Bhattacharjee A, Li X et al. Adult-onset CNS Sulfatide Deficiency causes sex-dependent metabolic disruption in aging. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(13).

  194. Linetti A, Fratangeli A, Taverna E, Valnegri P, Francolini M, Cappello V, et al. Cholesterol reduction impairs exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 4):595–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Zakany F, Kovacs T, Panyi G, Varga Z. Direct and indirect cholesterol effects on membrane proteins with special focus on potassium channels. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2020;1865(8):158706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Wang C, Yue H, Hu Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Li J, et al. Microglia mediate forgetting via complement-dependent synaptic elimination. Science. 2020;367(6478):688–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Mathews ES, Appel B. Cholesterol biosynthesis supports myelin gene expression and Axon Ensheathment through Modulation of P13K/Akt/mTor signaling. J Neurosci. 2016;36(29):7628–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Saher G, Brugger B, Lappe-Siefke C, Mobius W, Tozawa R, Wehr MC, et al. High cholesterol level is essential for myelin membrane growth. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(4):468–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Hughes TM, Rosano C, Evans RW, Kuller LH. Brain cholesterol metabolism, oxysterols, and dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(4):891–911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Cashikar AG, Toral-Rios D, Timm D, Romero J, Strickland M, Long JM, et al. Regulation of astrocyte lipid metabolism and ApoE secretionby the microglial oxysterol, 25-hydroxycholesterol. J Lipid Res. 2023;64(4):100350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Holtzman DM, Herz J, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein E receptors: normal biology and roles in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(3):a006312.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Liu LC, Liang JY, Liu YH, Liu B, Dong XH, Cai WH, et al. The intersection of cerebral cholesterol metabolism and Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Di Paolo G, Kim TW. Linking lipids to Alzheimer’s disease: cholesterol and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(5):284–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Abuznait AH, Kaddoumi A. Role of ABC transporters in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012;3(11):820–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  205. Staurenghi E, Giannelli S, Testa G, Sottero B, Leonarduzzi G, Gamba P. Cholesterol Dysmetabolism in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Starring Role for Astrocytes? Antioxid (Basel) 2021;10(12).

  206. Rizwan M, Aslam N, Ashfaq UA, Hayat M, Hussain SM. SNP of HMGCR and apo E genes and their impact in response to statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic patients in Pakistan. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2021;34(4Supplementary):1577–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Azizidoost S, Babaahmadi-Rezaei H, Nazeri Z, Cheraghzadeh M, Kheirollah A. Amyloid beta increases ABCA1 and HMGCR protein expression, and cholesterol synthesis and accumulation in mice neurons and astrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2022;1867(1):159069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Puglielli L, Tanzi RE, Kovacs DM. Alzheimer’s disease: the cholesterol connection. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(4):345–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Ahmed H, Wang Y, Griffiths WJ, Levey AI, Pikuleva I, Liang SH, et al. Brain cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease: challenges and opportunities in probe and drug development. Brain. 2024;147(5):1622–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Nitsch RM, Blusztajn JK, Pittas AG, Slack BE, Growdon JH, Wurtman RJ. Evidence for a membrane defect in Alzheimer disease brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(5):1671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Farooqui AA, Horrocks LA, Farooqui T. Glycerophospholipids in brain: their metabolism, incorporation into membranes, functions, and involvement in neurological disorders. Chem Phys Lipids. 2000;106(1):1–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Farooqui AA, Rapoport SI, Horrocks LA. Membrane phospholipid alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: deficiency of ethanolamine plasmalogens. Neurochem Res. 1997;22(4):523–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Stephenson D, Rash K, Smalstig B, Roberts E, Johnstone E, Sharp J, et al. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 is induced in reactive glia following different forms of neurodegeneration. Glia. 1999;27(2):110–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  214. Kuczynski B, Reo NV. Evidence that plasmalogen is protective against oxidative stress in the rat brain. Neurochem Res. 2006;31(5):639–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Guan Z, Wang Y, Cairns NJ, Lantos PL, Dallner G, Sindelar PJ. Decrease and structural modifications of phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogen in the brain with Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58(7):740–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  216. Han X, Holtzman DM, McKeel DW. Jr. Plasmalogen deficiency in early Alzheimer’s disease subjects and in animal models: molecular characterization using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Neurochem. 2001;77(4):1168–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Kou J, Kovacs GG, Hoftberger R, Kulik W, Brodde A, Forss-Petter S, et al. Peroxisomal alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122(3):271–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Hossain MS, Mawatari S, Honsho M, Okauchi T, Fujino T. KIT-13, a novel plasmalogen derivative, attenuates neuroinflammation and amplifies cognition. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1443536.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Zhai Y, Morihara R, Feng T, Hu X, Fukui Y, Bian Z, et al. Protective effect of scallop-derived plasmalogen against vascular dysfunction, via the pSTAT3/PIM1/NFATc1 axis, in a novel mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease with cerebral hypoperfusion. Brain Res. 2024;1828:148790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. Smith T, Knudsen KJ, Ritchie SA. A novel inducible animal model for studying chronic plasmalogen deficiency associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2024;1843:149132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Hamu-Tanoue A, Takagi K, Taketomi Y, Miki Y, Nishito Y, Kano K, et al. Group III secreted phospholipase A(2) -driven lysophospholipid pathway protects against allergic asthma. FASEB J. 2024;38(2):e23428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Hu C, Wang M, Han X. Shotgun lipidomics in substantiating lipid peroxidation in redox biology: methods and applications. Redox Biol. 2017;12:946–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. Frisardi V, Panza F, Seripa D, Farooqui T, Farooqui AA. Glycerophospholipids and glycerophospholipid-derived lipid mediators: a complex meshwork in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50(4):313–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. Kurano M, Saito Y, Uranbileg B, Saigusa D, Kano K, Aoki J, et al. Modulations of bioactive lipids and their receptors in postmortem Alzheimer’s disease brains. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1066578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. Ryan SD, Whitehead SN, Swayne LA, Moffat TC, Hou W, Ethier M, et al. Amyloid-beta42 signals tau hyperphosphorylation and compromises neuronal viability by disrupting alkylacylglycerophosphocholine metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(49):20936–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. Sabogal-Guaqueta AM, Arias-Londono JD, Gutierrez-Vargas J, Sepulveda-Falla D, Glatzel M, Villegas-Lanau A, et al. Common disbalance in the brain parenchyma of dementias: phospholipid profile analysis between CADASIL and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(8):165797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Kalecky K, German DC, Montillo AA, Bottiglieri T. Targeted metabolomic analysis in Alzheimer’s Disease plasma and brain tissue in non-hispanic whites. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(4):1875–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. Birgbauer E. Lysophospholipid receptors in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Explor Neuroprotective Ther. 2024;4(4):349–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Gomes R, Mendes I, Duarte MP, Bandarra NM, Gomes-Bispo A. New forms of neuroactive phospholipids for DHA Enrichment in Brain. Mar Drugs 2024;22(3).

  230. Marschallinger J, Iram T, Zardeneta M, Lee SE, Lehallier B, Haney MS, et al. Lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(2):194–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. Li Y, Munoz-Mayorga D, Nie Y, Kang N, Tao Y, Lagerwall J, et al. Microglial lipid droplet accumulation in tauopathy brain is regulated by neuronal AMPK. Cell Metab. 2024;36(6):1351–e708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. Mallick K, Paul S, Banerjee S, Banerjee S. Lipid droplets and neurodegeneration. Neuroscience. 2024;549:13–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Liu L, Zhang K, Sandoval H, Yamamoto S, Jaiswal M, Sanz E, et al. Glial lipid droplets and ROS induced by mitochondrial defects promote neurodegeneration. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):177–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Zadoorian A, Du X, Yang H. Lipid droplet biogenesis and functions in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(8):443–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Zhao X, Zhang S, Sanders AR, Duan J. Brain lipids and lipid droplet dysregulation in Alzheimer’s Disease and Neuropsychiatric disorders. Complex Psychiatry. 2023;9(1–4):154–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. Zhang W, Xu L, Zhu L, Liu Y, Yang S, Zhao M. Lipid droplets, the Central Hub Integrating Cell Metabolism and the Immune System. Front Physiol. 2021;12:746749.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  237. Qi G, Mi Y, Shi X, Gu H, Brinton RD, Yin F. ApoE4 impairs neuron-astrocyte coupling of fatty acid metabolism. Cell Rep. 2021;34(1):108572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Chan RB, Oliveira TG, Cortes EP, Honig LS, Duff KE, Small SA, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(4):2678–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. Morel E, Chamoun Z, Lasiecka ZM, Chan RB, Williamson RL, Vetanovetz C, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate regulates sorting and processing of amyloid precursor protein through the endosomal system. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. Dickinson WH. On the nature of the Waxy, Lardaceous, or amyloid Deposit. Med Chir Trans. 1867;50:39–56. 3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. Gellermann GP, Appel TR, Tannert A, Radestock A, Hortschansky P, Schroeckh V, et al. Raft lipids as common components of human extracellular amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(18):6297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. Rimon A. The chemical and immunochemical identity of amyloid. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1976;74:1–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  243. Sanderson JM. The association of lipids with amyloid fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(8):102108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  244. Glenner GG, Wong CW. Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;120(3):885–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  245. Barrow CJ, Yasuda A, Kenny PT, Zagorski MG. Solution conformations and aggregational properties of synthetic amyloid beta-peptides of Alzheimer’s disease. Analysis of circular dichroism spectra. J Mol Biol. 1992;225(4):1075–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Ross CA, Poirier MA. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Med 2004;10 Suppl:S10-7.

  247. Grimm MO, Mett J, Grimm HS, Hartmann T. APP function and lipids: a bidirectional link. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:63.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  248. Glenner GG. Amyloid beta protein and the basis for Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;317:857–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Chew H, Solomon VA, Fonteh AN. Involvement of lipids in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology and potential therapies. Front Physiol. 2020;11:598.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  250. Reid PC, Urano Y, Kodama T, Hamakubo T. Alzheimer’s disease: cholesterol, membrane rafts, isoprenoids and statins. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11(3):383–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  251. Ehehalt R, Keller P, Haass C, Thiele C, Simons K. Amyloidogenic processing of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein depends on lipid rafts. J Cell Biol. 2003;160(1):113–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  252. Lahdo R, De La Fourniere-Bessueille L. Insertion of the amyloid precursor protein into lipid monolayers: effects of cholesterol and apolipoprotein E. Biochem J. 2004;382(Pt 3):987–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Grimm MO, Grimm HS, Tomic I, Beyreuther K, Hartmann T, Bergmann C. Independent inhibition of Alzheimer disease beta- and gamma-secretase cleavage by lowered cholesterol levels. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(17):11302–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Wu M, Zhai Y, Liang X, Chen W, Lin R, Ma L, et al. Connecting the dots between Hypercholesterolemia and Alzheimer’s Disease: a potential mechanism based on 27-Hydroxycholesterol. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:842814.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  255. Langness VF, van der Kant R, Das U, Wang L, Chaves RDS, Goldstein LSB. Cholesterol-lowering drugs reduce APP processing to Abeta by inducing APP dimerization. Mol Biol Cell. 2021;32(3):247–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  256. Grimm MO, Kuchenbecker J, Grosgen S, Burg VK, Hundsdorfer B, Rothhaar TL, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid reduces amyloid beta production via multiple pleiotropic mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(16):14028–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  257. Costantini C, Weindruch R, Della Valle G, Puglielli L. A TrkA-to-p75NTR molecular switch activates amyloid beta-peptide generation during aging. Biochem J. 2005;391(Pt 1):59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  258. Takasugi N, Sasaki T, Shinohara M, Iwatsubo T, Tomita T. Synthetic ceramide analogues increase amyloid-beta 42 production by modulating gamma-secretase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;457(2):194–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  259. Grimm MO, Grimm HS, Patzold AJ, Zinser EG, Halonen R, Duering M, et al. Regulation of cholesterol and sphingomyelin metabolism by amyloid-beta and presenilin. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(11):1118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  260. Rudajev V, Novotny J. The role of lipid environment in Ganglioside GM1-Induced amyloid beta aggregation. Membr (Basel) 2020;10(9).

  261. Hu J, Linse S, Sparr E. Ganglioside Micelles affect amyloid beta aggregation by Coassembly. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023;14(24):4335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Amaro M, Sachl R, Aydogan G, Mikhalyov II, Vacha R, Hof M. GM1 Ganglioside inhibits beta-amyloid Oligomerization Induced by Sphingomyelin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55(32):9411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  263. Haraszti RA, Didiot MC, Sapp E, Leszyk J, Shaffer SA, Rockwell HE, et al. High-resolution proteomic and lipidomic analysis of exosomes and microvesicles from different cell sources. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016;5:32570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  264. Su H, Rustam YH, Masters CL, Makalic E, McLean CA, Hill AF, et al. Characterization of brain-derived extracellular vesicle lipids in Alzheimer’s disease. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(7):e12089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  265. Rajendran L, Honsho M, Zahn TR, Keller P, Geiger KD, Verkade P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid peptides are released in association with exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(30):11172–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  266. Bulloj A, Leal MC, Xu H, Castano EM, Morelli L. Insulin-degrading enzyme sorting in exosomes: a secretory pathway for a key brain amyloid-beta degrading protease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19(1):79–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  267. Tamboli IY, Barth E, Christian L, Siepmann M, Kumar S, Singh S, et al. Statins promote the degradation of extracellular amyloid beta-peptide by microglia via stimulation of exosome-associated insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) secretion. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(48):37405–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  268. Khursheed A, Viles JH. Impact of membrane phospholipids and exosomes on the kinetics of amyloid-beta Fibril Assembly. J Mol Biol. 2024;436(6):168464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Zeng Y, Han X. Sulfatides facilitate apolipoprotein E-mediated amyloid-beta peptide clearance through an endocytotic pathway. J Neurochem. 2008;106(3):1275–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Viles JH. Imaging amyloid-beta membrane interactions: Ion-Channel pores and lipid-bilayer permeability in Alzheimer’s Disease. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62(25):e202215785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  271. Zhang Y, Chen H, Li R, Sterling K, Song W. Amyloid beta-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: challenges, successes and future. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298(5594):789–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  273. Butterfield DA, Lauderback CM. Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in Alzheimer’s disease brain: potential causes and consequences involving amyloid beta-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32(11):1050–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  274. Montine TJ, Neely MD, Quinn JF, Beal MF, Markesbery WR, Roberts LJ, et al. Lipid peroxidation in aging brain and Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33(5):620–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Heneka MT, Golenbock DT, Latz E. Innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(3):229–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Aamodt EJ, Williams RC Jr. Microtubule-associated proteins connect microtubules and neurofilaments in vitro. Biochemistry. 1984;23(25):6023–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  277. Gray EG, Paula-Barbosa M, Roher A. Alzheimer’s disease: paired helical filaments and cytomembranes. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1987;13(2):91–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  278. Goux WJ, Rodriguez S, Sparkman DR. Characterization of the glycolipid associated with Alzheimer paired helical filaments. J Neurochem. 1996;67(2):723–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  279. Gellermann GP, Appel TR, Davies P, Diekmann S. Paired helical filaments contain small amounts of cholesterol, phosphatidylcholine and sphingolipids. Biol Chem. 2006;387(9):1267–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  280. Cheng KH, Graf A, Lewis A, Pham T, Acharya A. Exploring membrane binding targets of Disordered Human tau aggregates on lipid rafts using Multiscale Molecular Dynamics simulations. Membr (Basel) 2022;12(11).

  281. Nishikawa T, Takahashi T, Nakamori M, Hosomi N, Maruyama H, Miyazaki Y, et al. The identification of raft-derived tau-associated vesicles that are incorporated into immature tangles and paired helical filaments. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2016;42(7):639–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  282. Kawarabayashi T, Shoji M, Younkin LH, Wen-Lang L, Dickson DW, Murakami T, et al. Dimeric amyloid beta protein rapidly accumulates in lipid rafts followed by apolipoprotein E and phosphorylated tau accumulation in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2004;24(15):3801–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Elbaum-Garfinkle S, Ramlall T, Rhoades E. The role of the lipid bilayer in tau aggregation. Biophys J. 2010;98(11):2722–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  284. Sallaberry CA, Voss BJ, Majewski J, Biernat J, Mandelkow E, Chi EY, et al. Tau and membranes: interactions that promote folding and condensation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:725241.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  285. Fanni AM, Vander Zanden CM, Majewska PV, Majewski J, Chi EY. Membrane-mediated fibrillation and toxicity of the tau hexapeptide PHF6. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(42):15304–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Yao QQ, Wen J, Perrett S, Wu S. Distinct lipid membrane-mediated pathways of tau assembly revealed by single-molecule analysis. Nanoscale. 2022;14(12):4604–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. El Mammeri N, Gampp O, Duan P, Hong M. Membrane-induced tau amyloid fibrils. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):467.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  288. Kunze G, Barre P, Scheidt HA, Thomas L, Eliezer D, Huster D. Binding of the three-repeat domain of tau to phospholipid membranes induces an aggregated-like state of the protein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1818(9):2302–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  289. Majewski J, Jones EM, Vander Zanden CM, Biernat J, Mandelkow E, Chi EY. Lipid membrane templated misfolding and self-assembly of intrinsically disordered tau protein. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Mercken M, Grynspan F, Nixon RA. Differential sensitivity to proteolysis by brain calpain of adult human tau, fetal human tau and PHF-tau. FEBS Lett. 1995;368(1):10–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Cleveland DW, Hwo SY, Kirschner MW. Physical and chemical properties of purified tau factor and the role of tau in microtubule assembly. J Mol Biol. 1977;116(2):227–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  292. Alonso AD, Grundke-Iqbal I, Barra HS, Iqbal K. Abnormal phosphorylation of tau and the mechanism of Alzheimer neurofibrillary degeneration: sequestration of microtubule-associated proteins 1 and 2 and the disassembly of microtubules by the abnormal tau. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(1):298–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  293. Soni DM, Lin PB, Lee-Gosselin A, Lloyd CD, Mason E, Ingraham CM, et al. Inpp5d haplodeficiency alleviates tau pathology in the PS19 mouse model of Tauopathy. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(7):4985–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  294. Garcia-Cruz VM, Arias C. Palmitic acid induces posttranslational modifications of tau protein in Alzheimer’s Disease-related epitopes and increases intraneuronal tau levels. Mol Neurobiol. 2024;61(8):5129–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  295. Fan QW, Yu W, Senda T, Yanagisawa K, Michikawa M. Cholesterol-dependent modulation of tau phosphorylation in cultured neurons. J Neurochem. 2001;76(2):391–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  296. Chen Y, Yu Y. Tau and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: interplay mechanisms and clinical translation. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20(1):165.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Newton AC. Lipid activation of protein kinases. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(SupplSuppl):S266–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Murray NR, Fields AP. Phosphatidylglycerol is a physiologic activator of nuclear protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(19):11514–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  299. Olesova D, Dobesova D, Majerova P, Brumarova R, Kvasnicka A, Kouril S, et al. Changes in lipid metabolism track with the progression of neurofibrillary pathology in tauopathies. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21(1):78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Yang W, Liu Y, Xu QQ, Xian YF, Lin ZX. Sulforaphene ameliorates Neuroinflammation and Hyperphosphorylated tau protein via regulating the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta pathway in experimental models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:4754195.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  301. Mai M, Guo X, Huang Y, Zhang W, Xu Y, Zhang Y, et al. DHCR24 Knockdown induces tau hyperphosphorylation at Thr181, Ser199, Ser262, and Ser396 sites via activation of the lipid raft-dependent Ras/MEK/ERK Signaling pathway in C8D1A astrocytes. Mol Neurobiol. 2022;59(9):5856–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  302. Wang T, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu W, Wang L, Hao L, et al. High cholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol contribute to phosphorylation of tau protein by impairing autophagy causing learning and memory impairment in C57BL/6J mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2022;106:109016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  303. Malnar M, Hecimovic S, Mattsson N, Zetterberg H. Bidirectional links between Alzheimer’s disease and Niemann-pick type C disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;72:37–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  304. Yamada K. Extracellular tau and its potential role in the propagation of Tau Pathology. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:667.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  305. Vasili E, Dominguez-Meijide A, Outeiro TF. Spreading of alpha-synuclein and tau: a systematic comparison of the mechanisms involved. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  306. Dujardin S, Begard S, Caillierez R, Lachaud C, Delattre L, Carrier S, et al. Ectosomes: a new mechanism for non-exosomal secretion of tau protein. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100760.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Lee J, Ye Y. The roles of endo-lysosomes in unconventional protein secretion. Cells 2018;7(11).

  308. Ait-Bouziad N, Lv G, Mahul-Mellier AL, Xiao S, Zorludemir G, Eliezer D, et al. Discovery and characterization of stable and toxic Tau/phospholipid oligomeric complexes. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1678.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  309. Katsinelos T, Zeitler M, Dimou E, Karakatsani A, Muller HM, Nachman E, et al. Unconventional secretion mediates the trans-cellular spreading of tau. Cell Rep. 2018;23(7):2039–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  310. Merezhko M, Brunello CA, Yan X, Vihinen H, Jokitalo E, Uronen RL, et al. Secretion of tau via an unconventional non-vesicular mechanism. Cell Rep. 2018;25(8):2027–35. e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. McGeer EG, McGeer PL. The importance of inflammatory mechanisms in Alzheimer disease. Exp Gerontol. 1998;33(5):371–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  312. Wyss-Coray T, Mucke L. Inflammation in neurodegenerative disease–a double-edged sword. Neuron. 2002;35(3):419–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  313. Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):428–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  314. Simons M, Keller P, De Strooper B, Beyreuther K, Dotti CG, Simons K. Cholesterol depletion inhibits the generation of beta-amyloid in hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(11):6460–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  315. Legler DF, Micheau O, Doucey MA, Tschopp J, Bron C. Recruitment of TNF receptor 1 to lipid rafts is essential for TNFalpha-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Immunity. 2003;18(5):655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  316. Hansen SB, Wang H. The shared role of cholesterol in neuronal and peripheral inflammation. Pharmacol Ther. 2023;249:108486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  317. Mateos L, Ismail MA, Gil-Bea FJ, Leoni V, Winblad B, Bjorkhem I, et al. Upregulation of brain renin angiotensin system by 27-hydroxycholesterol in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;24(4):669–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  318. Testa G, Staurenghi E, Zerbinati C, Gargiulo S, Iuliano L, Giaccone G, et al. Changes in brain oxysterols at different stages of Alzheimer’s disease: their involvement in neuroinflammation. Redox Biol. 2016;10:24–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  319. Ramirez DM, Andersson S, Russell DW. Neuronal expression and subcellular localization of cholesterol 24-hydroxylase in the mouse brain. J Comp Neurol. 2008;507(5):1676–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. Testa G, Giannelli S, Sottero B, Staurenghi E, Giaccone G, Caroppo P et al. 24-Hydroxycholesterol Induces Tau Proteasome-Dependent Degradation via the SIRT1/PGC1alpha/Nrf2 Pathway: A Potential Mechanism to Counteract Alzheimer’s Disease. Antioxid (Basel) 2023;12(3).

  321. Nury T, Yammine A, Menetrier F, Zarrouk A, Vejux A, Lizard G. 7-Ketocholesterol- and 7beta-Hydroxycholesterol-Induced Peroxisomal disorders in glial, microglial and neuronal cells: potential role in Neurodegeneration: 7-ketocholesterol and 7beta-hydroxycholesterol-Induced Peroxisomal disorders and Neurodegeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1299:31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  322. Toral-Rios D, Long JM, Ulrich JD, Yu J, Strickland MR, Han X et al. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase mediates neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. J Exp Med 2024;221(4).

  323. Jeon SB, Yoon HJ, Park SH, Kim IH, Park EJ. Sulfatide, a major lipid component of myelin sheath, activates inflammatory responses as an endogenous stimulator in brain-resident immune cells. J Immunol. 2008;181(11):8077–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  324. Serhan CN. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature. 2014;510(7503):92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  325. Serhan CN, Chiang N, Van Dyke TE. Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(5):349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  326. Hjorth E, Zhu M, Toro VC, Vedin I, Palmblad J, Cederholm T, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids enhance phagocytosis of Alzheimer’s disease-related amyloid-beta42 by human microglia and decrease inflammatory markers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;35(4):697–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  327. Lynch AM, Loane DJ, Minogue AM, Clarke RM, Kilroy D, Nally RE, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid confers neuroprotection in the amyloid-beta challenged aged hippocampus. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28(6):845–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  328. Labrousse VF, Nadjar A, Joffre C, Costes L, Aubert A, Gregoire S, et al. Short-term long chain omega3 diet protects from neuroinflammatory processes and memory impairment in aged mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  329. Zhao Y, Calon F, Julien C, Winkler JW, Petasis NA, Lukiw WJ, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid-derived neuroprotectin D1 induces neuronal survival via secretase- and PPARgamma-mediated mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease models. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1):e15816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  330. Youssef M, Ibrahim A, Akashi K, Hossain MS. PUFA-Plasmalogens attenuate the LPS-Induced nitric oxide production by inhibiting the NF-kB, p38 MAPK and JNK pathways in Microglial cells. Neuroscience. 2019;397:18–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  331. Hossain MS, Tajima A, Kotoura S, Katafuchi T. Oral ingestion of plasmalogens can attenuate the LPS-induced memory loss and microglial activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;496(4):1033–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  332. Ifuku M, Katafuchi T, Mawatari S, Noda M, Miake K, Sugiyama M, et al. Anti-inflammatory/anti-amyloidogenic effects of plasmalogens in lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in adult mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  333. Hossain MS, Abe Y, Ali F, Youssef M, Honsho M, Fujiki Y, et al. Reduction of Ether-Type glycerophospholipids, Plasmalogens, by NF-kappaB Signal Leading to Microglial activation. J Neurosci. 2017;37(15):4074–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  334. Yiannopoulou KG, Papageorgiou SG. Current and future treatments in Alzheimer Disease: an update. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020;12:1179573520907397.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  335. Hampel H, Mesulam MM, Cuello AC, Farlow MR, Giacobini E, Grossberg GT, et al. The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2018;141(7):1917–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  336. Matsunaga S, Kishi T, Iwata N. Memantine monotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123289.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  337. Cherny RA, Atwood CS, Xilinas ME, Gray DN, Jones WD, McLean CA, et al. Treatment with a copper-zinc chelator markedly and rapidly inhibits beta-amyloid accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. Neuron. 2001;30(3):665–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  338. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore TH, Burke M, Davey Smith G, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(1):CD004816.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  339. Alberts AW, Chen J, Kuron G, Hunt V, Huff J, Hoffman C, et al. Mevinolin: a highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77(7):3957–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  340. Fassbender K, Simons M, Bergmann C, Stroick M, Lutjohann D, Keller P, et al. Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer’s disease beta -amyloid peptides Abeta 42 and Abeta 40 in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(10):5856–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  341. Shinohara M, Sato N, Kurinami H, Takeuchi D, Takeda S, Shimamura M, et al. Reduction of brain beta-amyloid (abeta) by fluvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, through increase in degradation of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragments (APP-CTFs) and abeta clearance. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(29):22091–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  342. Chang TY, Yamauchi Y, Hasan MT, Chang C. Cellular cholesterol homeostasis and Alzheimer’s disease. J Lipid Res. 2017;58(12):2239–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  343. Chatterjee S, Krishnamoorthy P, Ranjan P, Roy A, Chakraborty A, Sabharwal MS, et al. Statins and cognitive function: an updated review. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(2):4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  344. McGuinness B, Craig D, Bullock R, Passmore P. Statins for the prevention of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(1):CD003160.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  345. Van Eck M, Pennings M, Hoekstra M, Out R, Van Berkel TJ. Scavenger receptor BI and ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 in reverse cholesterol transport and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005;16(3):307–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  346. Holstege H, Hulsman M, Charbonnier C, Grenier-Boley B, Quenez O, Grozeva D, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2022;54(12):1786–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  347. Koldamova R, Staufenbiel M, Lefterov I. Lack of ABCA1 considerably decreases brain ApoE level and increases amyloid deposition in APP23 mice. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(52):43224–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  348. Wahrle SE, Jiang H, Parsadanian M, Kim J, Li A, Knoten A, et al. Overexpression of ABCA1 reduces amyloid deposition in the PDAPP mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):671–82.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  349. Litvinchuk A, Suh JH, Guo JL, Lin K, Davis SS, Bien-Ly N, et al. Amelioration of tau and ApoE4-linked glial lipid accumulation and neurodegeneration with an LXR agonist. Neuron. 2024;112(3):384–e4038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  350. Boehm-Cagan A, Bar R, Liraz O, Bielicki JK, Johansson JO, Michaelson DM. ABCA1 agonist reverses the ApoE4-Driven cognitive and brain pathologies. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(3):1219–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  351. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single Ascending Doses and Multiple Ascending Doses of CS6253 in Healthy Volunteers. National Library of Medicine-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=Alzheimer%27s%20Disease_intr=CS6253%20. Accessed December 29 2024.

  352. Zhao L, Gottesdiener AJ, Parmar M, Li M, Kaminsky SM, Chiuchiolo MJ, et al. Intracerebral adeno-associated virus gene delivery of apolipoprotein E2 markedly reduces brain amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;44:159–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  353. Rosenberg JB, Kaplitt MG, De BP, Chen A, Flagiello T, Salami C, et al. AAVrh.10-Mediated APOE2 Central Nervous System Gene Therapy for APOE4-Associated Alzheimer’s Disease. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2018;29(1):24–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  354. Gene Therapy for APOE4 Homozygote of Alzheimer’s Disease. National Library of Medicine-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03634007. Accessed December 29 2024.

  355. Parikh M, Patel K, Soni S, Gandhi T. Liver X receptor: a cardinal target for atherosclerosis and beyond. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21(6):519–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  356. Ogawa S, Lozach J, Benner C, Pascual G, Tangirala RK, Westin S, et al. Molecular determinants of crosstalk between nuclear receptors and toll-like receptors. Cell. 2005;122(5):707–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  357. Joseph SB, Castrillo A, Laffitte BA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Tontonoz P. Reciprocal regulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism by liver X receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9(2):213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  358. Zelcer N, Khanlou N, Clare R, Jiang Q, Reed-Geaghan EG, Landreth GE, et al. Attenuation of neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease pathology by liver x receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(25):10601–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  359. Lefterov I, Bookout A, Wang Z, Staufenbiel M, Mangelsdorf D, Koldamova R. Expression profiling in APP23 mouse brain: inhibition of Abeta amyloidosis and inflammation in response to LXR agonist treatment. Mol Neurodegener. 2007;2:20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  360. Zhang R, Wuerch E, Yong VW, Xue M. LXR agonism for CNS diseases: promises and challenges. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21(1):97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  361. Wang B, Tontonoz P. Liver X receptors in lipid signalling and membrane homeostasis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(8):452–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  362. Kirchgessner TG, Sleph P, Ostrowski J, Lupisella J, Ryan CS, Liu X, et al. Beneficial and adverse effects of an LXR agonist on human lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and circulating neutrophils. Cell Metab. 2016;24(2):223–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  363. Katz A, Udata C, Ott E, Hickey L, Burczynski ME, Burghart P, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single doses of LXR-623, a novel liver X-receptor agonist, in healthy participants. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49(6):643–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  364. Lehrke M, Lazar MA. The many faces of PPARgamma. Cell. 2005;123(6):993–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  365. Pascual G, Fong AL, Ogawa S, Gamliel A, Li AC, Perissi V, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-gamma. Nature. 2005;437(7059):759–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  366. Khan MA, Alam Q, Haque A, Ashafaq M, Khan MJ, Ashraf GM, et al. Current progress on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor Gamma Agonist as an Emerging Therapeutic Approach for the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: an update. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(3):232–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  367. Mandrekar-Colucci S, Karlo JC, Landreth GE. Mechanisms underlying the rapid peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma-mediated amyloid clearance and reversal of cognitive deficits in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2012;32(30):10117–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  368. Yamanaka M, Ishikawa T, Griep A, Axt D, Kummer MP, Heneka MT. PPARgamma/RXRalpha-induced and CD36-mediated microglial amyloid-beta phagocytosis results in cognitive improvement in amyloid precursor protein/presenilin 1 mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32(48):17321–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  369. Heneka MT, Sastre M, Dumitrescu-Ozimek L, Hanke A, Dewachter I, Kuiperi C, et al. Acute treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone and ibuprofen reduces glial inflammation and Abeta1-42 levels in APPV717I transgenic mice. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 6):1442–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  370. Watson GS, Cholerton BA, Reger MA, Baker LD, Plymate SR, Asthana S, et al. Preserved cognition in patients with early Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment during treatment with rosiglitazone: a preliminary study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13(11):950–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  371. Harrington C, Sawchak S, Chiang C, Davies J, Donovan C, Saunders AM, et al. Rosiglitazone does not improve cognition or global function when used as adjunctive therapy to AChE inhibitors in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: two phase 3 studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011;8(5):592–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  372. Burns DK, Alexander RC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Culp M, Chiang C, O’Neil J, et al. Safety and efficacy of pioglitazone for the delay of cognitive impairment in people at risk of Alzheimer’s disease (TOMMORROW): a prognostic biomarker study and a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(7):537–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  373. Sato T, Hanyu H, Hirao K, Kanetaka H, Sakurai H, Iwamoto T. Efficacy of PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone in mild Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(9):1626–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  374. Hanyu H, Sato T, Kiuchi A, Sakurai H, Iwamoto T. Pioglitazone improved cognition in a pilot study on patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(1):177–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  375. Chamberlain S, Gabriel H, Strittmatter W, Didsbury J. An exploratory phase IIa study of the PPAR delta/gamma agonist T3D-959 assessing metabolic and cognitive function in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(3):1085–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  376. Vina J, Escudero J, Baquero M, Cebrian M, Carbonell-Asins JA, Munoz JE, et al. Genistein effect on cognition in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease patients. The GENIAL clinical trial. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  377. Chang TY, Chang CCY, Harned TC, De La Torre AL, Lee J, Huynh TN, et al. Blocking cholesterol storage to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Explor Neuroprotective Ther. 2021;1(3):173–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  378. Shibuya Y, Chang CC, Chang TY. ACAT1/SOAT1 as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Future Med Chem. 2015;7(18):2451–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  379. Valencia-Olvera AC, Balu D, Faulk N, Amiridis A, Wang Y, Pham C, et al. Inhibition of ACAT as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease is Independent of ApoE4 lipidation. Neurotherapeutics. 2023;20(4):1120–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  380. Bryleva EY, Rogers MA, Chang CC, Buen F, Harris BT, Rousselet E, et al. ACAT1 gene ablation increases 24(S)-hydroxycholesterol content in the brain and ameliorates amyloid pathology in mice with AD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(7):3081–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  381. Shibuya Y, Niu Z, Bryleva EY, Harris BT, Murphy SR, Kheirollah A, et al. Acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase 1 blockage enhances autophagy in the neurons of triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mouse and reduces human P301L-tau content at the presymptomatic stage. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(7):2248–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  382. van der Kant R, Langness VF, Herrera CM, Williams DA, Fong LK, Leestemaker Y, et al. Cholesterol metabolism is a Druggable Axis that independently regulates tau and amyloid-beta in iPSC-Derived Alzheimer’s disease neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24(3):363–75. e9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  383. Tardif JC, Gregoire J, L’Allier PL, Anderson TJ, Bertrand O, Reeves F, et al. Effects of the acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor avasimibe on human atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation. 2004;110(21):3372–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  384. Sahi J, Milad MA, Zheng X, Rose KA, Wang H, Stilgenbauer L, et al. Avasimibe induces CYP3A4 and multiple drug resistance protein 1 gene expression through activation of the pregnane X receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;306(3):1027–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  385. Ikenoya M, Yoshinaka Y, Kobayashi H, Kawamine K, Shibuya K, Sato F, et al. A selective ACAT-1 inhibitor, K-604, suppresses fatty streak lesions in fat-fed hamsters without affecting plasma cholesterol levels. Atherosclerosis. 2007;191(2):290–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  386. Vincent Leong ANF. The importance of phospholipases A2 in Alzheimer’s disease mechanisms, pathology, and potential therapies. Phospholipases in Physiology and Pathology; 2023.

  387. Hui DY, Phospholipase. A(2) enzymes in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2012;23(3):235–40.

  388. Kudo I, Murakami M. Phospholipase A2 enzymes. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002;68–69:3–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  389. Ong WY, Farooqui T, Kokotos G, Farooqui AA. Synthetic and natural inhibitors of phospholipases A2: their importance for understanding and treatment of neurological disorders. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6(6):814–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  390. Yang X, Sheng W, Ridgley DM, Haidekker MA, Sun GY, Lee JC. Astrocytes regulate alpha-secretase-cleaved soluble amyloid precursor protein secretion in neuronal cells: involvement of group IIA secretory phospholipase A2. Neuroscience. 2015;300:508–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  391. Sanchez-Mejia RO, Newman JW, Toh S, Yu GQ, Zhou Y, Halabisky B, et al. Phospholipase A2 reduction ameliorates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(11):1311–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  392. Cunningham TJ, Souayah N, Jameson B, Mitchell J, Yao L. Systemic treatment of cerebral cortex lesions in rats with a new secreted phospholipase A2 inhibitor. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(11):1683–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  393. Maher-Edwards G, De’Ath J, Barnett C, Lavrov A, Lockhart A. A 24-week study to evaluate the effect of rilapladib on cognition and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015;1(2):131–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  394. A Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Study to Investigate the Brain Biodistribution of 18F GSK2647544 in Healthy Subjects to Determine Its Ability to Cross the Blood-brain-barrier, National Library of Medicine-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=GSK2647544_viewType=Table. Accessed December 29 2024.

  395. GSK2647544 RD, DDI in Healthy Young and Elderly, Volunteers. National Library of Medicine-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=GSK2647544_viewType=Table. Accessed December 29 2024.

  396. Safety T. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single, Oral Escalating Doses of GSK2647544 in Healthy Volunteers, National Library of Medicine-ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=GSK2647544_viewType=Table. Accessed December 29 2024.

  397. Chen CT, Green JT, Orr SK, Bazinet RP. Regulation of brain polyunsaturated fatty acid uptake and turnover. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2008;79(3–5):85–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  398. Shichiri M. The role of lipid peroxidation in neurological disorders. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2014;54(3):151–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  399. Bassett CN, Neely MD, Sidell KR, Markesbery WR, Swift LL, Montine TJ. Cerebrospinal fluid lipoproteins are more vulnerable to oxidation in Alzheimer’s disease and are neurotoxic when oxidized ex vivo. Lipids. 1999;34(12):1273–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  400. Rutten BP, Steinbusch HW, Korr H, Schmitz C. Antioxidants and Alzheimer’s disease: from bench to bedside (and back again). Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002;5(6):645–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  401. Cankurtaran M, Yesil Y, Kuyumcu ME, Ozturk ZA, Yavuz BB, Halil M, et al. Altered levels of homocysteine and serum natural antioxidants links oxidative damage to Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(4):1051–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  402. Vina J, Lloret A, Orti R, Alonso D. Molecular bases of the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with antioxidants: prevention of oxidative stress. Mol Aspects Med. 2004;25(1–2):117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  403. Yamashita S, Hashimoto M, Haque AM, Nakagawa K, Kinoshita M, Shido O, et al. Oral Administration of Ethanolamine Glycerophospholipid Containing a high level of Plasmalogen improves memory impairment in amyloid beta-infused rats. Lipids. 2017;52(7):575–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  404. Fujino T, Yamada T, Asada T, Tsuboi Y, Wakana C, Mawatari S, et al. Efficacy and blood plasmalogen changes by Oral Administration of Plasmalogen in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. EBioMedicine. 2017;17:199–205.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  405. Astarita G, Jung KM, Vasilevko V, Dipatrizio NV, Martin SK, Cribbs DH, et al. Elevated stearoyl-CoA desaturase in brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e24777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  406. Cunnane SC, Schneider JA, Tangney C, Tremblay-Mercier J, Fortier M, Bennett DA, et al. Plasma and brain fatty acid profiles in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29(3):691–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  407. Hamilton LK, Moquin-Beaudry G, Mangahas CL, Pratesi F, Aubin M, Aumont A, et al. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase inhibition reverses immune, synaptic and cognitive impairments in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  408. Hamilton LK, Dufresne M, Joppe SE, Petryszyn S, Aumont A, Calon F, et al. Aberrant lipid metabolism in the Forebrain Niche suppresses adult neural stem cell proliferation in an animal model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(4):397–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  409. Hamilton LK, M’Bra PEH, Mailloux S, Galoppin M, Aumont A, Fernandes KJL. Central inhibition of stearoyl-CoA desaturase has minimal effects on the peripheral metabolic symptoms of the 3xTg Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  410. Calder PC. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: nutrition or pharmacology? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75(3):645–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  411. Calder PC. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6 Suppl):S1505–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  412. de Urquiza AM, Liu S, Sjoberg M, Zetterstrom RH, Griffiths W, Sjovall J, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid, a ligand for the retinoid X receptor in mouse brain. Science. 2000;290(5499):2140–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  413. Grimm MO, Mett J, Stahlmann CP, Haupenthal VJ, Blumel T, Stotzel H, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid increase the degradation of amyloid-beta by affecting insulin-degrading enzyme. Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;94(6):534–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  414. Freund-Levi Y, Eriksdotter-Jonhagen M, Cederholm T, Basun H, Faxen-Irving G, Garlind A, et al. Omega-3 fatty acid treatment in 174 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: OmegAD study: a randomized double-blind trial. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(10):1402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  415. Quinn JF, Raman R, Thomas RG, Yurko-Mauro K, Nelson EB, Van Dyck C, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010;304(17):1903–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  416. Strike SC, Carlisle A, Gibson EL, Dyall SC. A high Omega-3 fatty acid multinutrient supplement benefits cognition and mobility in older women: a Randomized, Double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(2):236–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  417. Shinto L, Quinn J, Montine T, Dodge HH, Woodward W, Baldauf-Wagner S, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial of omega-3 fatty acids and alpha lipoic acid in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;38(1):111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  418. Lee LK, Shahar S, Chin AV, Yusoff NA. Docosahexaenoic acid-concentrated fish oil supplementation in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a 12-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacology. 2013;225(3):605–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the support from all members of Xianlin Han laboratory. We thank the support provided by the Department of Medicine, and Sam and Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies in University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.

Funding

This study was partially supported by National Institute on Aging grants R01 AG085545 (X.H.), R01 AG061872 (X.H.), RF1 AG061729 (X.H.), T32 AG021890 (S.H.), P30 AG066546, P30 AG013319, and P30 AG044271, and UT Health SA intramural institutional research funds (X.H.), Methodist Hospital Foundation (X.H.), Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (X.H.), and William and Ella Owens Medical Research Foundation (X.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SH and XH were involved in the conceptualization and content design of the manuscript. SH and ZX wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SH, ZX, and XH contributed to editing of the text. XH directed and provided resources for the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianlin Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have reached consent for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, S., Xu, Z. & Han, X. Lipidome disruption in Alzheimer’s disease brain: detection, pathological mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Mol Neurodegeneration 20, 11 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13024-025-00803-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13024-025-00803-6

Keywords